Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:40:56.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sustainable Development in Learning, Leadership and the Law: A Review Essay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Noel Gough*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University
*
School of Outdoor Education and Environment, La Trobe University, PO Box 199, Bendigo, Victoria 3552, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This review essay offers a critique of the concepts of sustainability and sustainable development through an appraisal of three recent texts. These texts explore issues of sustainability and sustainable development in the context of three different (but interrelated) discourses-practices, namely, (lifelong) learning, (educational) leadership and (environmental) law. The texts reviewed are:

Halsey, Mark. (2006). Deleuze and Environmental Damage: Violence of the Text. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Hargreaves, Andy, & Fink, Dean. (2006). Sustainable Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Scott, William A. H., & Gough, Stephen R. (2004). Sustainable Development and Learning: Framing the Issues. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006 

References

Adisu, M. (2005). Sustainable development and learning: Framing the issues (Book Review). Education Review. Retrieved 27 10 2006 from http://edrev.asu.edu/reviews/rev422.htm Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia. (1992). National forest policy statement. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (Massumi, Brian, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (Burchell, G. & Tomlinson, H., Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (Spivak, Gayatri Chakrovorty, Trans.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gough, N. (2002). Ignorance in environmental education research. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1926.Google Scholar
Halsey, M. (2006). Deleuze and environmental damage: Violence of the text. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kriewaldt, J. (2005). Key issues in sustainable development and learning: A critical review (Book Review). Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 129130.Google Scholar
Porter, R., & Porter, K. (2003). Habermas and the pragmatics of communication: A Deleuze–Guattarian critique. Social Semiotics, 13(2), 129145.Google Scholar
Scott, W. A. H., & Gough, S. R. (2004a). Sustainable development and learning: Framing the issues. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
Scott, W. A. H., & Gough, S. R. (Eds.). (2004b). Key issues in sustainable development and learning: A critical review. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
Stables, A. (1996). Reading the environment as text: literary theory and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 2(2), 189195.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. (1993). Ignorance in educational research: or, how can you not know that? Educational Researcher, 22(5), 1523.Google Scholar
Whitson, J. A. Tony (2006). Est-ce qu'il n'ya pas de hors-curriculum. Paper presented at Curriculum as an International Conversation: The Second World Curriculum Studies Conference, Tampere, Finland, 21-24 05. Retrieved 18 May, 2006. from http://www.uta.fi/laitokset/okl/tokl/wcsc/WCSCAbstract.pdf Google Scholar