Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:08:21.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Ecology as Innovative Tertiary Environmental Education1, 2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Lesley White
Lesley White*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Western Sydney- Hawkesbury, New South Wales
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Social ecology as expressed by the Social Ecology Centre, (Faculty of Agriculture & Rural Development, University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury), is an emerging field of learning concerned with improving the quality of the interrelationships between people and between people and the environment. The essence of this improvement is powerfully depicted by Albert Einstein, with this plea for people to widen their sense of compassion and concern to all life:

A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’ a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest, a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature and its beauty.

Social ecology then is concerned with recognising and transcending this ‘optical delusion’ of which Einstein speaks.

In 1992 the Social Ecology Centre will be offering, through the introduction of the Bachelor of Applied Science (Social Ecology) [B. App. Sc. (Soc. Ecol.)] program, a substantively new and different approach to environmental education at a tertiary level. The establishment of the B.App.Sc. (Soc. Ecol.) will provide for the first time learning opportunities in social ecology at undergraduate level.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 8 , 1992 , pp. 59 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Footnotes

1

As a relatively new member of the staff of the Social Ecology Centre, I am writing about a course that has come into being through many years of work by the staff of the Centre, and in particular, through the vision, tenacity and energy of Graham Bird.

References

Albury, R., The Politics of Objectivity, Deakin University Press, Geelong, 1983.Google Scholar
Aust. Academy of Science, Biological Science: The Web of Life, Parts 1 and 2, Canberra, 1981.Google Scholar
Bateson, G., Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Ballantine, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
Bawden, R. and Macadam, R., “Towards a University for People Centred Development: A Case History of Reform”, Aust. J. Adult and Community Edu., 30-3, pp. 138–53, 1990.Google Scholar
Berger, P.L. and Luckman, T., The Social Construction of Reality, Double Day, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
Bookchin, M., The Modern Crisis, New Society Publishers, Philadelphia, 1986.Google Scholar
Brewer, R., Principles of Ecology, Saunders, 1979.Google Scholar
Casti, V.L., Paradigms Lost, Avon Science, N.Y., 1989.Google Scholar
Clark, M.E., Ariadnes Thread, MacMillan Press, London, 1989.Google Scholar
Fisher, F., Transdisciplinary Teaching: Overcoming the Inevitable Dislocation Applying Science Without Regard to its Social Context In Out of the Crucible Proceedings, 1214 12. 1990, C.H.A.S.T. Uni. of Sydney, 1990, p. 67.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.G., Truth and Method, (translated and edited by Barden, G. and Cumming, J.), Seabury Press, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
Gardner, , Art, Mind and Brain, Basic Books Inc. Pub., New York, 1982.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., Existence and Being, Vision Press, London, 1956.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., Discourse on Thinking, (translated by Anderson, V.M. and Freund, E.H.), Harper and Row, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., On Time and Being, (translated by Stambaugh, J.), Harper and Row, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
Kease, A., (Ed), Ecological Biogeography of Australia, Jurk, The Hague - Boston - London, 1981.Google Scholar
Langer, S., Philosophy in a New Key, Cambridge Univ., Mass., 1942, pp.236–237.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N.. Essays on Self Reference, Columbia Uni. Press, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Macquarie Dictionary, The Macquarie Library, 1982.Google Scholar
Moltmann, J., God in Creation, S.C.M. Press, 1985, p.11.Google Scholar
Maturana, H.R. & Varela, F.J., The Tree of Knowledge, Shambhala Pub. Mass., 1987, p.27.Google Scholar
Miller, G., Living in the Environment, Wadsworth, Cal. 1990.Google Scholar
Naess, A., The Shallow and the Deep, Long Range Ecology Movement, Inquiry 16, 1973, pp. 95–100.Google Scholar
Pirsig, R., Lila: An Inquiry Into Morals, Bartam Press, Sydney, 1991, p. 329.Google Scholar
Russell, D., & Ison, R., (‘The Research - Development Relationship in Rangelands: An Opportunity for Contextual Science’, Plenary Paper for Fourth Internat. Rangelands Congress, Montpellier, France, 04, 1991.Google Scholar
Stapleton, G., Human Ecology, Faber & Faber, London, 1964.Google Scholar
Von Glasfield, E., The Construction of Knowledge: Contributions to Conceptual Semantics, Intersystems, Salinas, CA, 1987.Google Scholar
White, L.J., ‘The Contemporary Meaning of Mt. Evelyns Original Garden: An Epistemological Study of the Notion of Originality’, Masters Thesis, Monash, University, 1989, p. 49.Google Scholar
Wilden, A., System and Structure: Essays in Communication and Exchange, (2nd ed), Tavistock, London, 1980.Google Scholar
Winograd, T. and Flores, F., Understanding Computers and Cognition, Addison-Wesley, Mass., 1987, p. 8.Google Scholar