Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:32:10.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Personal Approach to Teaching about Climate Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Manfred Lenzen
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney
Christopher Dey
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney
Joy Murray
Affiliation:
NSW Department of Education and Training
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The problem of climate change is complex, global, and long-term, and therefore difficult to grapple with for politicians, scientists, teachers, and students alike. Teachers in particular face the problem of presenting climate change in a way that is not abstract and distant. To engage the intellect as well as emotions, students need to feel personally involved. One way to achieve this personal involvement is to link climate change to students' individual lives. Such a relationship can be created using a personal greenhouse gas budget, comprising ail emissions caused by a student over one year. A personal greenhouse gas calculator was developed at the School of Physics, University of Sydney, in the form of a computer spreadsheet, and applied in university teaching. This calculator does not only address emissions from energy use, but also those emissions embodied in goods and services. Embodied emissions are often ignored when climate change is related to lifestyles, As its normative part, the calculator states a benchmark of 3.5 t CO2 per person per year, based on the principle of global equity and sustainability. First experiences show that most students agree with that benchmark, and accept responsibility for embodied emissions. However, their own emissions results exceed by far the equitable and sustainable budget. This experience triggers various feelings, ranging from surprise and motivation, to guilt, denial, self-defence, cynicism, anger, and frustration. In contrast to a model where teaching is seen as transmission of information, this personal and provocative approach creates an emotional response, which affects memory, which in turn holds out the promise of long-term change.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

References

Agarwal, A. & Narain, S. 1991, Global Warming in an Unequal World, Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Australian Academy of Science 1995, Environmental Science Teachers Guide, Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics 1995, 1993-94 Household Expenditure Survey—Detailed Expenditure Items, ABS Catalogue No. 6535.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics 1997, Environmental Issues: People's Views and Practices 1996, ABS Catalogue No. 4602,0, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Beekman, V. 1997, Government Intervention in Non-Sustainable Lifestyles, Environmental Justice, Papers from the Melbourne Conference, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Bennulf, M. 1997, Social Justice, Political Convictions, Social Norms, and Personal Environmental Behaviour, Environmental Justice, Papers from the Melbourne Conference, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
BHP Steel 2001, CHAPPY—Determine the Environmental Impacts of your Family, Internet site http://www.chappy.au.com, BHP Billiton Minerals Technology–Newcastle Laboratories.Google Scholar
Brown, P. M. & Cameron, L. D. 2000, ‘What can be done to reduce overconsumption?’, Ecological Economics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 2741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, J., Wang, Y.-D., Lee, H. & Kim, J.-d. 1998, ‘An equity-and sustainability-based policy response to global climate change’, Energy Policy, vol., 26, no. 4, pp. 335343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabb, A. 2000, ‘Earth's survival answers in the wind’, The Adelaide Advertiser, 8 04, pp. 16.Google Scholar
De Young, R. 1996, ‘Some psychological aspects of reduced consumption behaviour’, Environment and Behavior, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 358409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, S. E. 1993, ‘Individual environmental responsibility and its role in public environmentalism’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 17431758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environment Australia 1997a, Global Warming—Cool it!, Environment Australia, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Environment Australia 1997b, Methane Capture and Use, Environment Australia, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Environment Protection Authority Victoria 1992a, Home Greenhouse Saver, EPA Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Environment Protection Authority Victoria 1992b, Work Greenhouse Saver, EPA Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Environment Protection Authority Victoria 1994, School Greenhouse Saver, EPA Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Environment Protection Authority Victoria 2001, Australian Greenhouse Calculator, Internet site http://www.publish.csiro.au/greenhouse/calcuiator/, EPA Victoria.Google Scholar
Gysi, C. & Reist, A. 1990, ‘Hors-sol Kulturen—eine ökologische Bilanz’, Landwirtschaft Schweiz, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 447459.Google Scholar
Hamilton, C. & Turton, H. 1999, ‘Population policy and environmental degradation: Sources and trends in greenhouse gas emissions’, People and Place, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 4262.Google Scholar
Harrison, C. M., Burgess, J. & Filius, P. 1996, ‘Rationalizing environmental responsibilities’, Global Environmental Change, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 215234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heil, M.T. & Wodon, Q.T. 1997, ‘Inequity in C02 emissions between poor and rich countries’, Journal of Environment and Development, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 426441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinchliffe, S. 1996, ‘Helping the earth begins at home’, Global Environmental Change, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 5362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstetter, P. 1992, Persönliche Energie- und CO2-Bilanz, Questionnaire and commentary, Greenpeace Schweiz and Verkehrs-Club der Schweiz, Zürich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Griggs, D. J. & Maskell, K. (eds) 1997, Stabilization of Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases: Physical, Biological and Socio-Economic Implications, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Hyder, T. O. 1992, ‘Climate Negotiations: The North/South Perspective’, in: Mintzer, I. M., Confronting Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 323336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1995, Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers, Technical Summary of the Working Group I Report Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.Google Scholar
Kandlikar, M. & Sagar, A. 1999, ‘Climate change research and analysis in India: An integrated assessment of a South-North divide’, Global Environmental Change, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 119138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempton, W. 1993, ‘Will public environmental concern lead to action on global warming?’, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, vol. 18, pp. 217245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenzen, M. 1997, International Equity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Environmental Justice, Papers from the Melbourne Conference, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Lenzen, M. 1999a, ‘Greenhouse gas analysis of solar-thermal electricity generation’, Solar Energy, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 353368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenzen, M. 1999b, ‘Total energy and greenhouse gas requirements for Australian transport’, Transportation Research Part D, vol. 4, pp. 265290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenzen, M. 2001, ‘The importance of goods and services consumption in household greenhouse gas emissions calculators’, Ambio, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 439442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenzen, M. & Murray, J. 2001a, ‘The role of equity and lifestyles in education about climate change: Experiences from a large-scale teacher development program’, Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 6, pp. 3251.Google Scholar
Lenzen, M. & Murray, J. 2001b, ‘A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia’, Ecological Economics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 229255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenzen, M. & Smith, S. 2000, ‘Teaching responsibility for climate change: Three neglected issues’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 15/16, pp. 6978.Google Scholar
Lund, H. 1998, ‘Environmental accounts for households: A method for improving public awareness and participation’, Local Environment, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 4354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, R. M. & Probert, S. D. 2000, ‘Enhancing the designs and impacts of guides for achieving reduced energy-consumptions’, Applied Energy, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mélanie, J., Phillips, B. & Tormey, B, 1994, ‘An international comparison of factors affecting carbon dioxide emissions’, Australian Commodities, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 468483.Google Scholar
Parikh, J. 1996, ‘Consumption Patterns: The Driving Force of Environmental Stress’, in May, P. H. & da Motta, R. Serôa, Pricing the Planet, Columbia University Press, New York. USA, pp. 3948.Google Scholar
Parikh, J. K. & Painuly, J. P. 1994, ‘Population, consumption patterns and climate change: a socioeconomic perspective from the south’, Ambio, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 434437.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 2000, Energy—The Changing Climate, Report Cm 4749, Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, London, UK.Google Scholar
Schipper, L. 1998, ‘Life-styles and the environment: The case of energy’, IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 314.Google Scholar
Schlumpf, C., Behringer, J., Dürrenberger, G. & Pahl-Wostl, C. 1999, ‘The personal CO., calculator: A modeling tool for Participatory Integrated Assessment methods’, Environmental Modeling and Assessment, vol. 4, pp. 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senate Environment Communications Information Technology and the Arts References Committee 2000, Submissions to Inquiry into Australia's Response to Global Warming, Vol. 6, Submission 124, Australian Senate, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Simmons, C. & Chambers, N. 1998, ‘Footprinting UK households: How big is your ecological garden?’, Local Environment, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 355362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, D., Lindsay, A., Marinopoulos, J., Treloar, A. & Wescott, G. 1994, ‘Household carbon dioxide production in relation to the greenhouse effect’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 40, pp. 197211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sustainable Solutions Pty Ltd 1996, The Australian Home Greenhouse Scorecard, Computer Software, EDSOFT, Blackburn, Vic, Australia.Google Scholar
Tomalty, R. 2000, ‘Household greenhouse gas emissions questionnaire’, Alternatives Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 3637.Google Scholar
Trainer, F. E. 1997, ‘Can renewable energy sources sustain affluent society?’, Energy Policy, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 10091026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis 1996, Statistical Yearbook—Annuaire Statistique, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Watson, R. T., Zinyowera, M. C. & Moss, R. H. (eds) 1996, Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Worsley, A. & Skrzypiec, G. 1998, ‘Environmental attitudes of senior secondary students in South Australia’, Global Environmental Change, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 209225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. 2000, ‘Web-based opportunities for renewable energy education’, Proceedings of the Solar Conference, no. Conf 25, pp. 785791.Google Scholar