Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:49:00.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In-School Sustainability Action: Climate Clever Energy Savers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2016

John Buchanan ,
Sandy Schuck  and
Peter Aubusson
John Buchanan*
Affiliation:
University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Sandy Schuck
Affiliation:
University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Peter Aubusson
Affiliation:
University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: John Buchanan, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo NSW 2007, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mandate for living sustainably is becoming increasingly urgent. This article reports on the Climate Clever Energy Savers (CCES) Program, a student-centred, problem- and project-based program in New South Wales, Australia, aimed at enabling school students to identify ways of reducing their schools’ electricity consumption and costs. As part of the program, students apply for Department of Education and Communities funds to address issues of electricity usage, such as building or appliance modifications, or education campaigns. In particular, this article focuses on the systemic approach used to assist teachers and students in meeting the aims of the CCES program, the Sustainability Action Process (SAP). To ascertain the contribution and value of such a framework in achieving project outcomes and associated learning and attitudinal change, we investigated teachers’ and some students’ uses and opinions of the SAP via surveys (n = 434), 16 interviews, and analysis of documents such as student work samples and lesson outlines. Our research indicates that the SAP has been a highly effective, enabling and engaging tool in helping students to identify ways and means of reducing electricity consumption and evaluating their effectiveness, as well as identifying allies and other sources of assistance in carrying out their projects.

Keywords

sustainability educationproblem-based learningproject learningstudent-centredsystems thinking
Type
Feature Articles
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , July 2016 , pp. 154 - 173
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2013). Cross-curriculum priorities. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/cross_curriculum_priorities.htmlGoogle Scholar
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014). Sustainability. Retrieved from http://mobile.australiancurriculum.edu.au/GeneralCapabilities/SustainabilityGoogle Scholar
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2015). Cross-curriculum priorities: Sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/cross_curriculum_priorities.htmlGoogle Scholar
Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (Eds.) (1997). Problem-based learning (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Brundiers, K., & Wiek, A. (2011). Educating students in real-world sustainability research: Vision and implementation. Innovative Higher Education, 36, 107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. (2012). Curriculum and education for sustainability: Finding its natural habitat? Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 28, 108–124.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J., Schuck, S., & Aubusson, P. (2013). Efficacy, agency and behavioural change: Evaluation of a local/global sustainability education program. The Social Educator, 30, 11–18.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J., Aubusson, P. & Schuck, S. (2014). A system-wide school-based program for sustainability: Climate Clever Energy Savers. In Thomas, K. & Muga, H. (Eds.), Cases on pedagogical innovations for sustainable development (pp. 245–269). IGI Global. Publisher's website: http://www.igi-global.com/chapter/a-system-wide-school-based-program-for-sustainability/103510Google Scholar
Buchanan, J., Schuck, S., & Aubusson, P. (2014). Future generations: Evaluation of the Climate Clever Energy Savers Program. Report prepared for the NSW Department of Education and Communities. Sydney, Australia: University of Technology Sydney. Retrieved from http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/env_ed/assets/pdf/cces_intro_chap1_2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bussey, M., Bjurstrom, A.E., Sannum, M., Avadhuta, S., Nadhomi-Mukisa, B., Ceruto, L, . . . Pineda, M.V. (2012). Weaving pedagogies of possibility. In Wals, A. & Corcoran, P. (Eds.), Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change (pp. 77–90). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheong, I. (2005). Educating pre-service teachers for a sustainable environment. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 97–110.Google Scholar
Craddock, D., O'Halloran, C., McPherson, K., Hean, S., & Hammick, M. (2013). A top-down approach impedes the use of theory? Interprofessional educational leaders’ approaches to curriculum development and the use of learning theory. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27, 65–72.Google Scholar
Cupitt, J., & Smith, S. (2012). Teaching for sustainability: Inquiry, values and action across the curriculum. South Yarra, Vic: Macmillan Education Australia.Google Scholar
Department of Environment and Heritage (2000). Environmental education for a sustainable future. Retrieved from www.environment.gov.au/education/publications/ee-review-schools/references.html.Google Scholar
Department of Environment and Heritage. (2005). Educating for a sustainable future: A national environmental education statement for Australian schools. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/8112406/Educating-for-SustainablefutureGoogle Scholar
Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA). (2010). Sustainability curriculum framework: A guide for curriculum developers and policy makers. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.Google Scholar
Dierking, L, Falk, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2012). Learning from neighboring fields: Conceptualizing outcomes of environmental education within the framework of free-choice learning experiences. In Stevenson, R., Brody, M., Dillon, J. & Wals, A. (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 359–366). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dimick, A. (2012). Student empowerment in an environmental science classroom: Toward a framework for social justice science education. Science Education, 96, 990–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, M., & Kitsantas, S. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem- and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 7, 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, J., Ryan, L., & Tilbury, D. (2007). Mainstreaming education for sustainable development in initial teacher education in Australia: A review of existing professional development models. Journal of Education for Teaching, 33, 225–239.Google Scholar
Fielding, K., & Head, B. (2012). Determinants of young Australians’ environmental actions: The role of responsibility attributions, locus of control, knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 18, 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, T. (2006). We are the weather makers: The story of global warming. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Fowler, F.J. (2013). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Griset, O.L. (2010). Meet us outside! Science Teacher, 77, 40–46.Google Scholar
Hacking, E., Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Barrett, R. (2012). Children as active researchers. In Stevenson, R., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Wals, A. (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 438–458). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hamilton, L. (2011). Education, politics and opinion about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change, 104, 231–242. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8Google Scholar
Heimlich, J., Mony, P., & Yocco, V. (2012). Belief to behavior: A vital link. In Stevenson, R., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Wals, A. (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 262–274). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Henderson, K., & Tilbury, D. (2004). Whole-school approaches to sustainability: An international review of sustainable school programs. Report prepared by the Australian Research Institute for Education for Sustainability (ARIES) for the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australian Government.Google Scholar
Hill, S. (2005). Social ecology as a framework for understanding and working with social capital and sustainability within rural communities. In Dale, A. & Onyx, J. (Eds.), Social capital & sustainable community development: A dynamic balance (pp. 48–68). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, S., Thomas, I., & Hegarty, K. (2012). Sustainability education: Theory and practice. In Stevenson, R., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Wals, A. (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 349–358). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huckle, J. (2012). Towards greater realism in learning for sustainability. In Wals, A. & Corcoran, P. (Eds.), Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change (pp. 35–48). Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Huckle, J. (1996). Education for sustainable citizenship: An emerging focus for education for sustainability. In Huckle, J. & Sterling, S. (Eds.), Education for sustainability (pp. 228–244). Abingdon, UK: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Hung, W. (2011). Theory to reality: A few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 529–552. doi: 10.1007/s11423-011-9198-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungerford, H.R., & Volk, T.L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 8–21.Google Scholar
Hunting, S., & Tilbury, D. (2006). Shifting towards sustainability: Six insights into successful organisational change for sustainability. Sydney, Australia: Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability (ARIES).Google Scholar
Katayama, J., & Gough, S. (2008). Developing sustainable development within the higher education curriculum: Observations from the HEFCE strategic review. Environmental Education Research, 14 (4), 413–422.Google Scholar
Kelsey, E., & Armstrong, C. (2012). Finding hope in a world of environmental catastrophe. In Wals, A. & Corcoran, P. (Eds.), Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change (pp. 187–201). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Lang, D., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffaucher, M., Martens, P., MollSwilling, M. Swilling, M., & Thomas, C. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7, Supplement 1, 25–43. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-xGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, K., & Kransy, M. (2012). Research on the long-term impacts of environmental education. In Stevenson, R., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Wals, A. (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 289–297). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Little, S., & Sauer, C. (1997). Organizational and institutional impediments to a problem-based approach. In Boud, D. & Feletti, G. (Eds.), Problem-based learning (2nd ed., pp. 81–88). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Maude, A. (2012). Defining and explaining sustainable development and sustainability: A review of curriculum guides and school texts. In Robertson, M. (Ed.), Schooling for sustainable development: A focus on Australia, New Zealand and the Oceanic region (pp. 49–63). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (Revised and expanded from Case study research in education). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Myers, B., Fisher, R., Pickering, S., & Garnett, S. (2013). Post-program evaluation of the sustainability of development program outcomes: A case study in Eastern Indonesia. Development in Practice, 24, 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T., & Cassell, J. (2012). Pedagogy for survival: An educational response to the ecological crisis. In Wals, A. & Corcoran, P. (Eds.), Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change (pp. 63–76). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowotny, H. (2005). The increase of complexity and its reduction: Emergent interfaces between the natural sciences, humanities and social sciences. Theory, Culture & Society, 22, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NSW DEC. (2014). Environmental education. Retrieved from http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/env_ed/teaching/Google Scholar
NSW DET. (2009). EOI: Climate Clever Energy Savers program evaluation. Unpublished tender document.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (2000). The ontogeny of information: Development systems and evolution (2nd ed.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, F., & Lyons, T. (2013, September). Educating for sustainability in virtual worlds: Does the virtual have value? Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association Conference, University of Cyprus, Nicosia. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/68280/1/68280.pdfGoogle Scholar
Reed, J. (2010). School improvement in transition: An emerging agenda for interesting times. In Kagawa, F. & Selby, D. (Eds.), Education and climate change: Living and learning in interesting times (pp. 141–160). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Savery, J. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. In Walker, A., Leary, H., Hmelo-Silver, C., & Ertmer, P. (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning (pp. 5–15). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, P. (1997). Persevering with problem-based learning. In Boud, D. & Feletti, G. (Eds.), Problem-based learning (2nd ed, pp. 58–63). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Smith, P., Collier, G., & Storey, H. (2011). As Aussie as Vegemite: Building the capacity of sustainability educators in Australia. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 27, 175–185.Google Scholar
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sterling, S. (2004). Thinking systemically. In Tilbury, D. & Wortman, D. (Eds.), Engaging people in sustainability. Cambridge, UK: IUCN Publications Services Unit.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R.B., & Evans, N. (2011). The distinctive characteristics of environmental education research in Australia: An historical and comparative analysis. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 27, 24–45.Google Scholar
Summers, M., Childs, A., & Corney, G. (2005). Education for sustainable development in initial teacher training: Issues for interdisciplinary collaboration. Environmental Education Research, 11, 624–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sund, L., & Öhman, K. (2014). On the need to repoliticise environmental and sustainability education: Rethinking the postpolitical consensus. Environmental Education Research, 20, 639–659.Google Scholar
Tilbury, D., & Wortman, D. (2004). Engaging people in sustainability. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Victorian Association for Environmental Education (2015). Environmental education. Retrieved from http://www.vaee.vic.edu.au/index.php/abstracts-a-workshops/433-roundtable-e23-sustainability-action-process-a-methodology-for-sustainability-learning-and-actionGoogle Scholar
Wiek, A., Ness, B., Schweizer-Ries, P., Brand, F., & Farioli, F. (2012). From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustainability Science, 7, Supplement 1, 5–24, doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0148-yGoogle Scholar
Wiek, A., Talwar, S., O'Shea, M., & Robinson, J. (2014). Toward a methodological scheme for capturing societal effects of participatory sustainability research. Research Evaluation, 23, 117–132.Google Scholar
Witchard, M., & Mulcahy, A. (2010). The CCES challenge. Presentation at the Office of Schools Conference. Retrieved from http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/env_ed/assets/pdf/CCES_folio.pdfGoogle Scholar
Yin, R. (2012). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Zint, M. (2012). Advancing environmental education program evaluation: Insights from a review of behavioural outcome evaluations. In Stevenson, R., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Wals, A. (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 298–309). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar