Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:48:00.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Howling About Trophic Cascades

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2012

David Kowalewski
David Kowalewski*
Affiliation:
Alfred University, USA
*
Address for correspondence: David Kowalewski, Alfred University, Alfred, NY, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following evolutionary theory and an agriculture model, ecosystem research has stressed bottom-up dynamics, implying that top wild predators are epiphenomenal effects of more basic causes. As such, they are assumed expendable. A more modern co-evolutionary and wilderness approach — trophic cascades — instead suggests that top predators, whose effects flow down to fundamental biological processes, are co-equal causes of ecosystem health. Their survival, then, should be supported. This article, based on extensive research including the author's participation in a major field project, provides informational resources for teaching trophic cascades, using wolves as a case study. As charismatic, iconic, thriving but still endangered, well-studied, and terrestrial carnivores, wolves are ideal for enlightening students about what otherwise might be dry abstractions about crucial ecosystem processes. The article ends with student exercises and broader lessons for environmental education.

Keywords

trophic cascadesgray wolvesendangered speciesco-evolutionecosystem dynamics
Type
Feature Articles
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , July 2012 , pp. 17 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arjo, W., Pletscher, D., & Ream, R. (2002). Spatio-temporal co-occurrence of cougars, wolves, and their prey during winter. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 2001–2012.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, R., Anderson, D., & Packer, J. (2010). Exploring the impact of integrated fieldwork, reflective and metacognitive experiences on student environmental learning outcomes. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 26, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, W., Whitman, J., & Gardner, C. (1987). Ecology of an exploited wolf population in South-Central Alaska. Wildlife Monographs, 98, 3–54.Google Scholar
Bangs, E. (1991). Return of a predator: A wolf survey in Montana. Western Wildlands, Spring, 7–13.Google Scholar
Bell, A., Russell, C., & Plotkin, R. (1998). Environmental learning and the study of extinction. Journal of Environmental Education, 29 (2), 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. (1999). Anthropogenic extinction of top carnivores and interspecific animal behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 266, 2261–2267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, J., Stacey, P.B., Bellis, L., & Johnson, M.P. (2001). A mammalian predator-prey imbalance. Ecological Applications, 11, 967–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beschta, R.L. (2005). Reduced cottonwood recruitment following extirpation of wolves in Yellowstone's Northern Range. Ecology, 86, 391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beschta, R.L., & Ripple, W. (2007). Wolves, elk, and aspen in the winter range of Jasper National Park, Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37, 1873–1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beschta, R.L., & Ripple, W. (2009). Large predators and trophic cascades in terrestrial ecosystems of the western United States. Biological Conservation, 142 (11), 2401–2414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beschta, R.L., & Ripple, W. (2012). The role of large predators in maintaining riparian plant communities and river morphology. Geomorphology 157–158(1 July), 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Smith, R. (2003). Ecological literacy: The ‘missing paradigm’ in environmental education (part one). Environmental Education Research, 9 (4), 497–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, C. (2008). Trophic cascades involving humans, wolves, elk, and aspen in the Crown of the Continent Ecosystem. Oregon State University, PhD dissertation proposal.Google Scholar
Estes, J.A., Terborgh, J., Brashares, J.S., Power, M.E., Berger, J., Bond, W.J., . . . Wardle, D.A. (2011). Trophic downgrading of planet earth. Science, 333, 301–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, G., & Theberge, J. (1996). Response by wolves to prey variation in Central Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 74, 1511–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin, D., Beyer, H., Boyce, M., Smith, D., Duchesne, T., & Mao, J. (2005). Wolves influence elk movements: Behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology, 86, 1320–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritts, S., & Mech, L. (1981). Dynamics, movements, and feeding ecology of a newly protected wolf population in Northwestern Minnesota. Wildlife Monographs, 80, 3–79.Google Scholar
Fuller, T. (1989). Population dynamics of wolves in North-Central Minnesota. Wildlife Monographs, 105, 3–41.Google Scholar
Grinnell, G. (2005). Blackfeet Indian stories. Helena, MT: Riverbend.Google Scholar
Hairston, N., Smith, F., & Slobodkin, L. (1960). Community structure, population control, and competition. American Naturalist, 94, 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebblewhite, M., White, C., Nietvelt, C., McKenzie, J., Hurd, T., Fryxell, J., Bayley, S., & Paquet, P. (2005). Human activity mediates a trophic cascade caused by wolves. Ecology, 86, 2135–2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingerman, S. (1997). A fall to grace. Santa Fe, NM: Moon Tree Rising.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, D. (2002). Teaching deep ecology: A student assessment. Journal of Environmental Education, 33 (4), 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalewski, D. (2009). Anatomy of a wolf den site: A field report. Electronic Green Journal. Retrieved from http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclalib/egj/vol1/iss28/art1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalewski, D., & Hoover, D. (1995). The future world-system? A dynamic model. World Futures, 44, 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunkel, K., & Pletscher, D. (2001). Winter hunting patterns and success of wolves in Glacier National Park, Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management, 65, 520–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laundre, J., Hernandez, L., & Altendorf, K. (2001). Wolves, elk, and bison: Re-establishing the ‘landscape of fear’ in Yellowstone National Park. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79, 1401–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mladenoff, P., Haiaght, R., Sickley, T., & Wydeven, A. (1997). Causes and implications of species restoration in altered ecosystems. BioScience, 47, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, W. (1966). Community structure, population control, and competition — A critique. American Naturalist, 100, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Geographic. (2010). Wolf wars. Special issue (March).Google Scholar
National Resources Defense Council. (2009). Protecting wolves in the American West. New York: Author.Google Scholar
Nelson, M., & Mech, L. (1992). Relationship between snow depth and gray wolf predation on white-tailed deer. Journal of Wildlife Management, 56, 471–474.Google Scholar
Pace, M., Cole, J., Carpenter, S., & Kitchell, J. (1999). Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 483–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, R. (1999). Wolf-moose interactions on Isle Royale. Ecological Applications, 9, 10–16.Google Scholar
Polis, G. (1994). Food webs, trophic cascades, and commuity structure. Australian Journal of Ecology, 19, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potvin, F., & Jolicoeur, H. (1988). Wolf diet and prey selectivity during two periods for deer in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 66, 1274–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7 (3), 207–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripple, W., & Beschta, R. (2003). Wolf reintroduction, predation risk, and cottonwood recovery in Yellowstone National Park. Forest Ecology and Management, 184, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripple, W., & Beschta, R. (2004). Wolves and the ecology of fear: Can predation risk structure ecosystems? BioScience, 54, 755–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripple, W., & Beschta, R. (2005). Linking wolves and plants: Aldo Leopold on trophic cascades. BioScience, 55, 613–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripple, W., & Beschta, R. (2007). Restoring Yellowstone's aspen with wolves. Biological Conservation, 138, 514–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripple, W., & Beschta, R. (2009). Trophic cascades involving cougar, mule deer, and black oaks in Yosemite National Park. Biological Conservation, 141 (6), 1249–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripple, W., & Larsen, E. (2000). Historic aspen recruitment, elk, and wolves in northern Yellowstone Park. Biological Conservation, 95, 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripple, W., Larsen, E., Renkin, R., & Smith, D. (2001). Trophic cascades among wolves, elk, and aspen on Yellowstone National Park's Northern Range. Biological Conservation, 102, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robelia, B., & Murphy, T. (2012). What do people know about environmental issues? Environmental Education Research, 18 (3), 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, E. (2010). This land is our land? This land is your land: The decolonizing journeys of white outdoor environmental educators. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 15, 103–119.Google Scholar
Sanera, M. 1998. Environmental education: Promise and performance. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 3, 9–26.Google Scholar
Schultz, J. (2010). My life as an Indian. New York: Skyhorse.Google Scholar
Smith, D., Peterson, R., & Houston, D. (2003). Yellowstone after wolves. BioScience, 53, 330–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terborgh, J., & Estes, J. (2010). Trophic cascades. Washington, DC: Island.Google Scholar
Tsevreni, I. (2011). Towards an environmental education without scientific knowledge: An attempt to create an action model based on children's experiences, emotions, and perceptions about their environment. Environmental Education Research, 17 (1), 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar