Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:31:09.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Framework Thinking, Subject Thinking and “Taiwan-ness” in Environmental Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2012

Mei-Chun Michelle Yueh  and
Miles Barker
Mei-Chun Michelle Yueh*
Affiliation:
University of Waikato
Miles Barker
Affiliation:
University of Waikato
*
†Address for correspondence: Mei-Chun Michelle Yueh, Sz-Yu Junior High School, Taichung, Taiwan. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the 1998 Taiwanese national curriculum revision, environmental education was one of six new “Important Issues”. To some early observers, the generic “framework” sections of this 1998 curriculum (Aims, Goals, Core Competences) resonated well with the integrative and transdisciplinary nature of environmental education. This synergy held out promise for the successful introduction of environmental education to Taiwan, despite it not being one of the seven new Learning Areas (or subjects). However, this study suggests that a pervasive nation-wide exam-driven, subject-dominated educational climate resulted in a somewhat truncated “Taiwan-ness” in the environmental education that emerged. In three Junior High Schools preparing for curriculum implementation, there was little early focus on, either the national curriculum's framework aspects or the intended integrative nature of environmental education. Rather, by 2004 curriculum integration had become offcially non-compulsory, and environmental education was conceived as a minor priority, to be wedged where possible into spaces within the traditional subjects.

Keywords

curriculumsubjectlearning areasubject thinkingframework thinking
Type
Feature Articles
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 27 , Issue 1: Special Issue: The “ness” of Environmental Education , 2011 , pp. 134 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Government Department of the Environment (2010). Sustainability curriculum framework: A guide for curriculum developers and policy makers. Canberra: Department of the Environment.Google Scholar
Baker, R. (1999). Teachers' views: ‘Science in the New Zealand Curriculum’ and related matters. New Zealand Science Teacher, 91, 3–16.Google Scholar
Barker, M. (2008). Towards transformation: ‘The New Zealand Curriculum’, environmental education for sustainability, and teacher development. Invited address, national education for sustainability hui, Long Bay, Auckland, 5th March.Google Scholar
Barker, M. (2009). Science teaching and the NZ curriculum. New Zealand Science Teacher, 120, 29–33.Google Scholar
Bassey, M. (1981). Pedagogic research: On the relative merits of search for generalisation and study of single events. Oxford Review of Education, 7(1), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beane, J. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Bolstad, R., & Baker, R. with Barker, M. & Keown, P. (2003). An evaluation of environmental education in New Zealand schools, volume 2: A review of national and international research literature on environmental practices. A review commissioned by the Ministry of Education, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Chang, T. C. (1999). The study of infusion teaching for environmental education in the Grade 1–9 Curriculum. Paper presented at the National Environmental Education Conference, Taipei, Taiwan. (Text in Chinese.)Google Scholar
Chen, P. J. (1999). The contemporary environmental education and the compulsory education Grade 1–9 Curriculum. Paper presented at the National Environmental Education Conference, Taipei, Taiwan. (Text in Chinese.)Google Scholar
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). London: Routledge.Google ScholarPubMed
Cowie, B., Hipkins, R., Boyd, S., Bull, A., Keown, P., McGee, C., Cooper, B., Ferrier-Kerr, J., Hume, A., McKim, A., Moreland, J., Morrison, M., Bolstad, R., Taylor, M., Yates, R., Spiller, L. (2009). Curriculum implementation studies: Final Report, Part 1. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/curriculum/57760/1Google Scholar
Eames, C., Barker, M., Wilson-Hill, F. & Law, B. (2010). Investigating the relationship between whole-school approaches to education for sustainability and student learning: A summary. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Fensham, P. (1976). A report on the Belgrade Workshop on environmental education. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.Google Scholar
Fien, J., Heck, D., & Ferreira, J. (eds.) (1997). Learning for a sustainable environment: A professional development guide for teachers. Bangkok: UNESCO Principal Regional Offce for Asia and the Pacifc.Google Scholar
Hart, P. (2003). Teachers' thinking in environmental education. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hart, P. & Nolan, K. (1999). A critical analysis of research in environmental education. Studies in Science Education, 34, 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J. L. (2010). A study on teacher education of knowledge and competences in context of globalization for standard-based of teacher quality. Abstracts: International Conference on the Key Competencies and Educational Innovation in a Global Era, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 149–150.Google Scholar
Huckle, J., & Sterling, S. (1996). Education for sustainability. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Littledyke, M., Taylor, N., & Eames, C. (2009). Education for sustainability in the primary curriculum. South Yarra: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Loveless, M., & Barker, M. (2000). “Those pages we just turn over …”: The ‘nature of science’ in Science in the New Zealand Curriculum. New Zealand Science Teacher, 93, 28–32.Google Scholar
Malone, K. (2006). Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? Paper presented at the New Zealand Association of Environmental Education (NZAEE) Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
McKeown, R. (2002). Education for sustainable development tool kit. Knoxville, TN: Centre for geography and Environmental Education, University of Tennessee.Google Scholar
Mutch, C. (2005). Doing educational research: A practitioner's guide to getting started. Wellington: NZCER Press.Google Scholar
New Zealand Ministry of Education (1999). Guidelines for environmental education in New Zealand Schools. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
Orr, D. (1994). Earth in mind: On education, environment and the human prospect. Washington: Prospect Island Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. A. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st century: Theory, practice, progress and promise. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, K. (2010). Teaching and learning about controversial science issues. New Zealand Science Teacher, 125, 30–33.Google Scholar
Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change. Bristol: Green Books.Google Scholar
Tilbury, D. (1995). Environmental education for sustainability: Defning the new focus of environmental education in the 1990s. Environmental Education Research, 1(2), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNESCO (1975). The Belgrade Charter: A framework for environmental education. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0001/000177/017772eb.pdfGoogle Scholar
WWF (1990). Exploring my world. Surry: World Wildlife Fund.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed. Vol. 5). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Yueh, M. M. (2007). Introducing a new subject: The case of environmental education in Taiwanese junior high schools. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar