Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:56:53.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Education Towards Personal, Professional and Societal Change: Possibilities for Distance Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Malcolm Plant
Malcolm Plant*
Affiliation:
The Nottingham Trent University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper I describe the design of distance education texts that encourage the kinds of student-tutor dialogue which ‘industrial’ methods of course delivery may find hard to achieve, and how such texts enable students and their tutors to be critically reflective about the theory and practice of environmental education in different cultural contexts. Aspects of the following are discussed - the limitations of ‘new technologies’ in resolving issues faced by distance educators; the potential of open texts in distance education; ways of supporting students in necessary critical reflection; the Importance of social belonging for students, especially those of distance education courses in environmental education. The paper concludes with a series of suggestions for colleagues wishing to establish culturally sensitive, critically reflective distance education courses in environmental education.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 13 , 1997 , pp. 69 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

References

Adams, J. & McShane, T. 1992, The Myth of Wild Africa, W. W. Norton, London, UK.Google Scholar
Altrichter, H. 1989, ‘Action research in distance education: some observations and reflections’, in Evans, T. (ed.), Research in Distance Education, Deakin University Press, Geelong, Victoria.Google Scholar
Arger, G. 1987, ‘Promise and reality: a critical analysis of literature on distance education in the third world’. Journal of Distance Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Bak, N. 1995, ‘Green doesn't always mean go: possible tensions in the desirability and implementation of environmental education’. Environmental Education Research, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, T. 1993, Natural Relations: Ecology, Animal Rights and Social Justice, Verso, London, UK.Google Scholar
Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. 1986, Becoming Critical: Knowing Through Action Research, Deakin University Press, Geelong, Victoria /Falmer Press, Lewes, UK.Google Scholar
Cobb, E. 1977, The Ecology of Imagination in Childhood, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, UK.Google Scholar
Crump, A. 1991, Dictionary of Environment and Development: People, Places, Ideas and Organisations, Earthscan, London, UK.Google Scholar
Dent, R. 1996, A Tentative Basis for Considering Future Environmental Education Provision in Malawi, unpublished dissertation for MA in Environmental Education, The Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Eliot, G. 1880 (1985 reprint), The Mill on the Floss, Penguin, Harmondsworth, UK.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. (ed.) 1993, Reconstructing Teacher Education: Teacher Development, Falmer Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Evans, T. & Nation, D. 1989, Critical Reflections on Distance Education, Falmer Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984, The Constitution of Society, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Giroux, H. A. 1989, Schooling for Democracy: Critical Pedagogy in the Modern Age, Routledge, London, UK.Google Scholar
Giroux, H. A. & McClaren, P. 1989, ‘Teacher education and the politics of engagement’, Harvard Educational Review, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 213–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, R. 1990, ‘Research and distance education in third world cultural contexts’, in Evans, G. (ed.). Research in Distance Education, Deakin University Press, Geelong, Victoria.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1972, Knowledge and Human Interests, Heinemann, London, UK.Google Scholar
Harris, D. 1987, Openness and Closure in Distance Education, Falmer Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Harris, D. 1991, ‘Towards a critical educational technology in distance education’, in Evans, T. & King, B. (eds). Beyond the Text: Contemporary Writing on Distance Education, Deakin University Press, Geelong, Victoria.Google Scholar
Heylings, P. 1996, unpublished research proposal for MA in Environmental Education, The Nottingham Trent. University, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Huckle, J. & Sterling, S. 1996, Education for Sustainability, Earthscan, London, UK.Google Scholar
Janse van Rensburg, E. 1995, ‘Social transformation in response to the environmental crisis: the role of education and research’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 10, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Kemmis, S. 1986, ‘Mapping Utopia: towards a socially critical curriculum’, Interaction, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
Milton, K. 1996, Environmentalism and Cultural Theory, Routledge, London, UK.Google Scholar
Plant, M. 1996, Evaluation Report on the Potential for an MA in Environmental Education in East Africa, The Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Plant, M. & Firth, R. 1994, MA in Environmental Education Through Action Enquiry, Course Valldation Document, The Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Robottom, I. & Hart, P. 1994, ‘Behaviourist environmental education research: environmentalism as individualism’, Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roszak, T. 1993, The Voice of the Earth, Bantam Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Thorpe, M. 1993, Evaluating Open and Distance Learning, 2nd edn, Longman, Harlow, UK Google Scholar
Wexler, P. 1981, ‘Body and soul: sources of social change and strategies’, British Journal for Sociology of Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. A. 1995, ‘Ecological autobiography’, Environmental Education Research, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 305–314.Google Scholar