Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:19:03.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Educational Dimensions of Environmental School Initiatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Peter Posch
Peter Posch*
Affiliation:
University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the first part of the paper some features of the international 0ECD/CERI Project “Environment and School Initiatives” are described. The central idea of the project is to support teachers in educational activities that connect the promotion of dynamic qualities (such as initiative and self-confidence) with the promotion of environmental awareness. In the second part the project's philosophy and its educational implications are discussed: The main idea is that the increase in human-produced complexity has created a qualitatively new situation, in which local initiatives, long-term value-orientations and the wide-spread ability to reflect on one's own actions become a matter of survival. For the educational system this means a redefinition of its tasks to include reflective action on their environment by students and teachers and an appreciation of the value complexity of environmental problems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 6 , 1990 , pp. 79 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

Allerbeck, K. & Hoag, W. Jugend ohne Zukunft? 3rd ed., Piper, Munich, 1986.Google Scholar
Altrichter, H. & Posch, P. Lehrer erforschen ihren Unterricht – Einführung in die Methoden der Aktionsforschung, Klinkhardt, Had Heilbrunn, 1990.Google Scholar
Arranz, R.M. “Abgrund Mensch - Der Mensch im Fefüge der Natur unter dem Gesichtespunkt der Informatik”, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, 1987, Mimeo.Google Scholar
Becker, G.E. “Gonschorek G. Kultusminister schicken 55.000 Lehrer vorzeitig in Pension - Konsequenzen aus dem Heidelberger BURNOUT-Test (BOT)”, Pädagogik, 6, 1989, pp. 16–23.Google Scholar
Bundesministerium für Unterricht, Kunst und Sport. Umwelterziehung in den Schulen - Erlab 37 888/8-110 (14c)/85, Verordnungsblatt des BMUKS, Stück 5, 50, 1985.Google Scholar
CERI (Center for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD). Environment and School Initiatives - Proposal by the Austrian Authorities, OECD/CERI, Paris, 1986, Doc.Nr.CERI/CD (86)11.Google Scholar
Conti, L. ‘Environment and School Initiatives - The Environmental Perspective”, in OECD/CERI (eds.), Environmental Education and Citizens of the Future, OECD, Paris, in preparation.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. “Educational Theory and the Professional Learning of Teachers: An Overview”, Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(1), 1989, pp.81–101.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. “Environmental Education in Europe - Innovation, Marginalization, or Assimilation”, in OECD/CERI (eds.), Environmental Education and Citizens of the Future, OECD, Paris, in preparation.Google Scholar
Haas, K. “A Primary School's Initiatives”, Arge Umwelterziehung, Vienna, ESIP-Series, No.5.Google Scholar
Kvarda, W. “Learning in Project Instruction”, Arge Umwelterziehung, Vienna, ESIP-Series No.2.Google Scholar
Pfaffenwimmer, G. “Environmental Projects - Principals' Views”, Arge Umwelterziehung, Vienna, in preparation.Google Scholar
Pietschmann, J. Das Ende des naturwissenschaftlichen Zeitalters, Zsolnay, Wien, 1980.Google Scholar
Posch, P. “Dynamic Qualities and Environmental Sensitivity in Education”, Arge Umwelterziehung, Vienna, 1990, ESI-Series, No.9.Google Scholar
Robottom, I. “Environmental Education: Reconstructing the Curriculum for Environmental Responsibility”, New Education, XII(2), 1990.Google Scholar
Schindler, G. “The Conflict”, Arge Umwelterziehung, Vienna, ESIP-Series, No.6.Google Scholar
Schön, D. The Reflective Practitioner - How Professionals Think in Action, Temple Smith, London, 1983.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, K. “Emancipation Through Environmental Projects?” Arge Umwelterziehung, Vienna, 1990, ESIP-Series, No.4.Google Scholar
Taviss, I. “A Survey of Popular Attitudes Toward Technology”, Technology and Culture, 13, 1972.Google Scholar
Tenbruck, F. “Der Fortschritt der Wissenschaft als Trivialisierungsprozeb”, in Steer, N. & König, R. (eds.), Wissenschaftssoziologie Kölner Zts. f. Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 18, 1975, pp. 19–47.Google Scholar
Zimmerhackl, K. “Wiesen für Schmetterlinge und Hecken für Vögel - Grundzusammenlegung als ökologischer Konflikt”, Arge Umwelterziehung, Wien, 1990, USIP-Reihe, No.9.Google Scholar