Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:12:04.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parents Teaching Location Prepositions to their Intellectually Handicapped Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Roger J. Rees
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using prompting and reinforcement procedures, two intellectually handicapped children in a parent oriented language teaching programme were taught to respond correctly to categories of locational prepositional requests. Training sessions for parents and daily parent teaching sessions for the children alternated with weekly probe sessions. During home teaching a child was taught to respond to one request and then, during probing, the child was tested for generalization of this teaching to untrained requests. Responses to probed requests were never prompted. The results show that, as requests from one category were taught, so the children’s responses to the untrained requests became increasingly correct. One child was able to satisfactorily discriminate among two and then three different categories of prepositional requests. The other child did not reach this stage, largely because his mother felt that the discrimination tasks were too difficult. However, there was evidence in training that this child could cope with more difficult tasks, and the success of the other child does appear to indicate that the teaching method employed was successful in teaching generalized receptive discrimination among locational prepositional categories.

Type
Articles
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , November 1979 , pp. 7 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attneave, F. How do you know? American Psychologist, 1974, 29: 493–499.Google Scholar
Baer, D.M. and Guess, D. Receptive training of adjectival inflections in mental retardates. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 1971, 4: 129–139.Google Scholar
Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M. and Risley, T.R. some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1: 91–97.Google Scholar
Baker, M.H. When the Down’s syndrome baby is yours. RN, July, 1977, 67–70.Google Scholar
Bettison, S. Simple behaviour modification techniques as aids in teaching parents of autistic children child rearing principles. Australian Journal of Mental Retardation, 1974, 3 (3): 64–69.Google Scholar
Bidder, R.J., Bryant, G. and Gray, O.P. Benefits to Down’s syndrome children through training their mothers. Archives of Diseases in Childhood, 1975, 50: 383–386.Google Scholar
Bricker, W.A. and Bricker, D.D. An early language training strategy. In Schiefelbusch, R.L. and Lloyd, L.L. (Eds), Language perspectives, retardation and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Fries, C.C. The Structure of English. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1952.Google Scholar
Frisch, S.A. and Schumaker, J.B. Training generalized receptive prepositions in retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974, 7 (4): 611–621.Google Scholar
Gray, B. and Ryan, B. A language program for the non-language child. Champaign, Illinois: Research Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Green, A.C.H. and Soutter, G.B. The family and the young handicapped child: the importance of the right start. Medical Journal of Australia, 1977, 1: 254–257.Google Scholar
Guess, D. A functional analysis of receptive language and productive speech: acquisition of the plural morpheme. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969, 2: 55–64.Google Scholar
Heifetz, L.J. Behavioural training for parents of retarded children: alternative formats based on instructional manuals. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1977, 82: 194–203.Google Scholar
Hirshoren, A. Special education and the schools. In Suran, B.G. and Rizzo, J.V. (Eds), Special children: an integrative approach. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1979.Google Scholar
Keller, F.S. and Ribes-Inesta, E. (Eds), Behavior modification applications to education. London, New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Luria, A.R. The directive function of speech in development and dissolution. In Bar-Adon, A. and Leopold, W. (Eds), Child Language. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1971.Google Scholar
MacDonald, J.D., Blott, J.P., Gordon, K., Spiegel, B. and Hartmann, M. An experimental parent-assisted treatment program for pre-school language delayed children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1974, 29(4): 394–415.Google Scholar
Mittler, P. Language development in the mentally handicapped: an overview. In Andrews, R.J. (Ed), Language performance of exceptional children. nFred and Eleanor Schonell Educational Research Centre, University of Queensland, 1975.Google Scholar
Myklebust, H.R. Childhood aphasia: identification, diagnosis, remediation. In Travis, L.E. (Ed), Handbook of speech pathology and audiology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1971.Google Scholar
Rees, R.J. Parents as language therapists for intellectually handicapped children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 1976, 1(4): 30–41.Google Scholar
Rees, R.J. Parents as language therapists for intellectually handicapped children: preliminary research report. National Advisory Council for the Handicapped, Department of Social Security, Canberra: 1978.Google Scholar
Rees, R.J. and Pickering, K.L. Parents as language therapists for intellectually handicapped children: a language manual. Canberra: Canberra College of Advanced Education, December, 1975.Google Scholar
Reynell, J.K. Reynell Developmental Language Scales, London: National Foundation for Educational Research, 1969.Google Scholar
Sailor, W. and Taman, T. Stimulus factors in the training of prepositional usage in three autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972, 5: 183–190.Google Scholar
Sandow, S. and Clarke, A.D.B. Home intervention with parents of severely subnormal pre-school children: an interim report. Child Care, Health and Development, 1978, 4: 29–39.Google Scholar
Scholes, R.J. Syntactic and lexical components of sentence comprehension. In Caramazza, A. and Zurif, E.B. (Eds), Language acquisition and language breakdown: parallels and divergencies. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Trace, M.W., Cuvo, A.J. and Criswell, J.L. Teaching coin equivalence to the mentally retarded. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977, 10: 85–92.Google Scholar
Wright, J., Clayton, J. and Edgar, C.L. Behaviour modification with low-level mental retardates. Psychological Record, 1970, 20: 465–471.Google Scholar