Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:21:52.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Opportunities for choice in day programs for adults with severe intellectual disabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Anthony J. Shaddock ,
David Zilber ,
Sally Guggenheimer ,
Leanne Dowse ,
Meredith Bennett  and
Frances Browne
Anthony J. Shaddock*
Affiliation:
University of Canberra
David Zilber
Affiliation:
University of Canberra
Sally Guggenheimer
Affiliation:
University of Canberra
Leanne Dowse
Affiliation:
University of Canberra
Meredith Bennett
Affiliation:
University of Canberra
Frances Browne
Affiliation:
University of Canberra
*
Correspondence may be addressed to Associate Professor Shaddock, University of Canberra, PO Box 1, Belconnen 2616, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines choice-making in work and community access programs by people perceived to have a severe intellectual disability. The results indicate that the quality and quantity of choice-making are restricted in these settings. The impact of factors such as type of work setting, gender, perceived attractiveness and level of ability are investigated. The implications of this study for research, personnel preparation and workplace interactions are explored.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 48 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bannerman, D., Sheldon, J., Sherman, J. and Harchik, A. (1990). Balancing the Right to Habilitation with the Right to Personal Liberties: The Rights of People with Developmental Disabilities to Eat Too Many Doughnuts and Take a Nap. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 23 (1) 79–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellamy, T., Rhodes, L. Bourbeau, P. and Mank, D. (1988). Disability Services Program. Menial Retardation Services in Sheltered Workshops and Day Activity Programs: Consumer Outcomes and Policy Alternatives. Department of Community Services and Health.Google Scholar
Bennett, M., Shaddock, A., and Guggenheimer, S. (1992). The Complexities of Providing Choice in a Community Group Home for People with Severe Intellectual Disabilities. Paper presented at the International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency Congress, Gold Coast, Australia.Google Scholar
Burnett, P. (1991). Decision-Making Style and Self-Concept. Australian Psychologist 26(1) 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirrin, F. and Rowland, C. (1985). Communicative Assessment of Nonverbal Youths with Severe/Profound Mental Retardation. Mental Retardation 23 (2) 52–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Dalton, B. and Bedrosian, J. (1989). Communicative Performance of Adolescents with Severe Developmental Disabilities. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities. 13 (2) 83–98.Google Scholar
Disability Services Act (1986). Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Disability Services Program, (1988). Supported Employment Services Department of Community Services and Health.Google Scholar
Dunlap, G. (1990). Choice-Making as a Management Strategy. AAMR News and Notes 3(6) p3.Google Scholar
Guess, D., Benson, A. and Siegel-Causey, E. (1985). Concepts and Issues Related to Choice-Making and Autonomy Among Persons With Severe Disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10(2) 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, J., Bronicki, G. and Guess, D. (1987). Opportunities to Express Preferences and Make Choices Among Students with Severe Disabilities in Classroom Settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 12(1) 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishi, G., Teelucksingh, B., Zollers, N., Park-Lee, S. and Meyer, L. (1988). Daily Decision-Making in Community Residences: A Social Comparison of Adults With and Without Mental Retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation 92(5) 430–435.Google ScholarPubMed
Leder, G. and Samson, S. (1989). Educating Girls: Practice and Research. Sydney, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
MacDonald, J. and Gillette, Y. (1986). Communicating with Persons with Severe Handicaps: Roles of Parents and Professionals. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 11(4) 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. and Snyder-McLean, L. (1987). Form and Function of Communicative Behaviour Among Persons with Severe Developmental Disabilities. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities. 13(2) 83–98.Google Scholar
Owens, R. and Rogerson, B. (1988). in Calculator, S. and Bedrosian, J., (eds) Communication Assessment and Intervention for Adults with Mental Retardation. London, Taylor and Francis, pp189–238.Google Scholar
C., Peck (1985). Increasing Opportunities for Social Control by Children with Autism and Severe Handicaps: Effects on Student Behaviour and Perceived Classroom Climate. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. 10(4) 183–193.Google Scholar
Shaddock, A.J., Bennett, M., Dowse, L., Guggenheimer, S., Stancliffe, R. and Zilber, D. (1992a) Communication and Interactions in Day Programs for Adults with Severe Intellectual Disabilities: Styles of Initiation and Responding. Paper presented at the International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency Congress, Gold Coast, Australia.Google Scholar
Shaddock, A.J., Bennett, M., Dowse, L., Guggenheimer, S., Stancliffe, R. and Zilber, D. (1992b) Day to Day Choice by People with a Severe Intellectual Disability in Different Home Settings Paper presented at the International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency Congress, Gold Coast, Australia.Google Scholar
Shevin, M. and Klein, N. (1984). The Importance of Choice-Making Skills For Students with Severe Disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. 9(3) 159–166.Google Scholar
Siegel-Causey, E. and Guess, D. (1989). Enhancing Nonsymbolic Communication Interactions Among Learners with Severe Disabilities. Baltimore, Paul H. Brooks.Google Scholar
Stancliffe, R. (1991). Choice-making by Adults in Supported Community Accommodation: Hobson’s Choice? Interaction, 5 (4) 23–33.Google Scholar
Veach, D. (1977). Choice with Responsibility. Young Children 32, 22–25.Google Scholar
West, D. and Parent, W. (1992). Consumer Choice and Empowerment in Supported Employment Services: Issues and Strategies. Journal for the Association of the Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17(1) 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, S. (1989). Quality of Life and People with a Very Profound Handicap. British Journal of Mental Subnormality. 35 (1) No 68.Google Scholar
Whyte, J. Deem, R., Kant, L. and Cruickshank, M. (eds) (1985). Girl Friendly Schoolmg London, Methuen.Google Scholar