Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:42:04.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Language Proposal to Maximize Communication for an Echolalic Responding Adult

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Tony Spinks
Tony Spinks*
Affiliation:
The Woden School, Australian Capital Territory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The theme of the 11th National Conference of the Australian Association of Special Education was Responding to Expectations. Responding to expectations requires anticipation of correct educational directions and proper teaching strategies to accommodate such directions. All decisions that result from responding to expectations are fundamentally controversial and should be challenged. Through the process of challenge, expectations change, and this has been the case in the development of teaching strategies to improve communication for those who have a limited response repertoire.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , May 1987 , pp. 28 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrera, R. D. & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1983). An alternating treatment comparison of oral and total communication training programmes with echolalic autistic children. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis. 16, 379–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. & Bellugi, U. (1963). Three processes in the child’s acquisition of syntax. In Lenneberg, E. (Ed.) New Directions in the Study of Language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Brown, L., Branston, M.B., Hamre-Nietupski, S., Pumpian, I., Certo, N. & Greunewald, L. (1979). A strategy for developing chronological age appropriate and functional curricular content for severely disabled adolescents and young adults. Journal of Special Education, 13 (1), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlop, M.H. (1983). The effects of echolalia on the acquisition and generalisation of receptive labelling in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 16, 111–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H.B. & Sherman, J.A. (1975). Teaching generative use of sentence answers to three forms of questions. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 8, 321–330.Google ScholarPubMed
Coleman, S. & Stedman, J. (1974). Use of a peer model in language training in an echolalic child. Journal of Behavioural Therapeutic Experiments in Psychiatry, 5, 275–279.Google Scholar
Culatta, B. & Horn, D. (1982). A programme for achieving generalisation of grammatical rules to spontaneous discourse. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 32, 3–10.Google Scholar
Donnellan, A.M., Mirenda, P.L., Mesaros, R.A. & Fassbender, L.L. (1984). Analyzing the communicative functions of aberrant behaviour. Journal for the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9 (3), 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchan, J. F. (1985). Autistic behaviour: Deviant or different. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 13 (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englemann, S.E. & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and application. New York, NY: Irvington.Google Scholar
Fay, W.H. (1969). On the basis of autistic echolalia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 2, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koegel, R.L., Loraas, O.I. & Schreibman, L.A. (1974). Behaviour modifications approach to the treatment of autistic children. Journal of Autism & Childhood Schizophrenia, 4, 111–129.Google Scholar
Lamberts, F. & Burns, M. (1979). Observations of elicited language imitation with the severely retarded. Journal of Speech and Language, 22, (1).Google ScholarPubMed
Lovaas, O.I. (1977). The autistic child: Language development through behaviour modification.NY: Irvington Press.Google Scholar
Lovaas, O.I. & Schreibman, L. (1971). Stimulus overselectivity of autistic children in a two stimulus situation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 9, 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovaas, O.I., Koegel, R., Simmons, J. & Long, J. (1973). Some generalisation and follow up measures on autistic children in behaviour therapy. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 6, 131–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prizant, B.M. & Duchan, J.F. (1981). The function of immediate ccholalia in autistic children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 8, 241–249.Google Scholar
Prizant, B.M. (1983). Language acquisition and communicative behaviour in autism: Towards an understanding of the ‘Whole’ of it. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 296–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prizant, B.M. & Wetherby, A.M. (1985). Intentional communicative behaviour of children with autism: Theoretical and practical issues. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 13 (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreibman, L. & Carr, G. (1978). Elimination of echolalic responding to questions through the training of a generalised response. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 11, 453–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serapiglia, T. & Kaplan, H. (1983). Diagnosing basic skills: A handbook for deciding what to teach. Columbus OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
Shapiro, T. & Lucy, P. (1978). Echoing in autistic children: A chronometric study of semantic processing. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 19, 373–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spinks, A.T. & Dockrill, C.F. (1985). Power plays. Sydney: Methuen.Google Scholar