Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:19:47.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coloured Lenses and Reading: A Review of Research into Reading Achievement, Reading Strategies and Causal Mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

G.L. Robinson
G.L. Robinson*
Affiliation:
Special Education Centre, University of Newcastle
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr G.L. Robinson, Special Education Centre, University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper reviews investigations on the use of coloured filters in relation to possible causal mechanisms, effects on reading achievement and effects on eye movement. Studies of causes suggest a retinal - sensory after-imaging problem, possibly related to the magnocellular visual neurological pathway. Studies of reading achievement suggest this disability may be one causal factor in reading problems but improvement will be influenced by prior word attack skill and willingness to be involved in reading. Investigation of reading strategies suggest that the claimed reductions in print distortions could allow more reading fluency and enable attention to be directed to meaning rather than word identification, which in turn facilitates access to text context as a supplement to word recognition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , 1994 , pp. 3 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, L., & Attwood, M. (1987). Poor readers: what do they really see on the page ? A study of a major cause of dyslexia. Los Angeles CA: Los Angeles County Office of Education.Google Scholar
Andrews, S. (1989). Psycholinguistics and reading ascquisition. New South Wales Journal of Special Education. 10, 15–21.Google Scholar
Blaskey, P., Scheiman, M., Parisi, M., Ciner, E.B., Gallaway, M. & Selznick, R.(1990). The Effectiveness of Men filters for improved reading performance: A pilot study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23 (10), 604–612.Google Scholar
Bond, G.L., Tinker, M.A., & Wasson, B.B. (1979). Reading difficulties: Their diagnosis and correction. (4th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs N.J: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bouma, H., & Legein, Ch.P. (1977). Foveal and parafoveal recognition of letters and words by dyslexies and by average readers. Neuropsychologica, 15, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouma, H., & Legein, Ch.P. (1980). Dyslexia: A specific recoding deficit? An analysis of response latencies for letters and words in dyslexies and average readers. Neuropsychologica, 18, 285–298.Google Scholar
Brarman, J.R., & Williams, M.C. (1988). Developmental versus sensory defeat effects on perceptual processing in the reading disabled. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 437–444.Google Scholar
Breitmeyer, B.G. (1989). A visually based deficit in specific reading disability. The Irish Journal of Psychology 10, 534–541.Google Scholar
Breznitz, Z. (1987). Increasing first graders reading accuracy and comprehension by accelerating their reading rates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 236–242.Google Scholar
Bruck, M. (1988). The word recognition and spelling of dyslexic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(1), 51–68.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. (1990). Long term evaluation of the effect of Men tinted lenses on academic and related skills. Unpublished M.Ed. Thesis. University of Canberra, Belconnen A.C.T.Google Scholar
Canino, F.J. (1981). Learned helplessness theory: Implications for research in learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 15, 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, L.K.S., & Robinson, G.L.W. (1989). The effects of comprehension monitoring instruction for reading disabled students with and without tinted lenses. Australian Journal of Special Education, 13(1), 4–13.Google Scholar
Chan, L.K.S., & Robinson, G.L.W. (1990). The effects of poor reader’s responsiveness to metacognition instruction in comprehension. Department of Education, University of Newcastle, Australia.Google Scholar
Clay, M.M., & Imlach, R.H. (1971). Juncture, pitch and stress as reading behaviour variables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 10, 133–139.Google Scholar
Cotton, M.M., & Evans, K.M.(1990). An evaluation of Irlen Lenses as a treatment for specific reading disorders. Australian Journal of Psychology. 42(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar
Eames, T.H. (1957). The relationship of the central visual field to the speed of visual perception. American Journal of Opthalmology, 43, 279–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, D.F., & Shebliske, W.L. (1985). There is more that meets the eye than the eyemind assumption. In R.Croner, , McConkie, G.W., & Menz., C. (Eds.). Eye Movements and Human Information processing. (pp 149–157). B.V. (North Holland): Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Foss, D.J., & Hakes, D.T. (1978). Psycholinguistics. Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Fricker, S. (1989). Do Irlen coloured glasses improve stereopsis and reading ability in children who have reading difficulties caused by visual perceptual distortion when they look at black print on white paper, and does their colour vision differ from the normal population? Unpublished Diploma of Community Child Health Thesis, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
Gole, G.A., Dibden, S.N., Pearson, C.R., Pidgeon, K.J., Hannell, G., Fitzgerald, B.A., Kortman, J.Y., & McGlinchey, N.D., (1989). Tinted lenses and dyslexies: A controlled study. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Opthalmology, 17, 137–141.Google Scholar
Griffin, D.C., Walton, N.H., & Ives, V. (1974). Saccades as related to reading disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(5), 310–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannell, G., Gole, G.A., Dibden, S.M., Rooney, F., Pidgeon, K.J., & McGlinchey, N.D. (1989). Reading improvement with tinted lenses: A report of two cases. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 72, 170–176.Google Scholar
Holland, K.C., Tyrrell, R., & Wilkins, A. (1991 July). The effect of Irlen coloured lenses on saccadic eye movements and reading. Paper presented at the Coloured Spectacles and Reading Difficulties Seminar, London.Google Scholar
Irlen, H. (1983, August). Successful treatment of Learning Disabilities. Paper presented at the 91st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim California.Google Scholar
Irlen, H. (1987). Irlen Differential Perceptual Schedule. Long Beach, California: Perceptual Development Corporation.Google Scholar
Irlen, H. & Lass, M.J. (1989). Improving reading problems due to symptoms of Scotopic Sensitivity Syndrome using Irlen lenses and overlays. Education, 30(10), 1–5.Google Scholar
Jennings, G.D.J., & Underwood, G. (1984). The influence of parafoveal information on a simple reading task. In Gale, A.G. & Johnson, F. (Eds.). Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp179–185). B.V. (North Holland): Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–447.Google Scholar
Juel, C. Griffith, P., & Gough, P. (1986). Acquisitions of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in 1st and 2nd grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.Google Scholar
Kirby, J.R. & Williams, N.H. (1991). Learning problems: A cognitive approach. Toronto, Canada: Kagan & Woo.Google Scholar
Kreuttner, P., & Strum, I. (1990). The Men Approach: An intervention for students with low reading achievement and symptoms of Scotopic Sensitivity Syndrome. New York City Schools, New York.Google Scholar
Kyd, L.J.C., Sutherland, G.F.M., & McGettrick, P.M. (1992). A preliminary appraisal of the Irlen screening process for Scotopic Sensitivity Syndrome and the effect of Irlen coloured overlays on reading. The British Orthoptic Journal, 49, 25–30.Google Scholar
La Berge, D., & Samuels, S. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.Google Scholar
Lea, A.R., & Hailey, D.M. (1990). Tinted lenses in the treatment of the reading disabled. Canberra, A.C.T: Australian Institute of Health.Google Scholar
Lehmkuhle, S., Garzia, R.P., Turner, L., Hash, T., & Baro, L.A. (1993). A defective visual pathway in children with reading disability. New England Journal of Medicine. 328 (14), 989–996.Google Scholar
Liberman, I.Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1985). Phonology and the problem of learning to read and write. RASE, 6, 8–17.Google Scholar
Licht, B.G. (1983). Cognitive-motivational factors that contribute to the achievement of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 483–490.Google Scholar
Livingstone, M.S., & Hubel, D.H. (1987). Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement and depth. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3416–3468.Google Scholar
Livingstone, M.S., Rosen, G.D., Drislane, F.W., & Galaburda, A.M. (1991). Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 88, 7943–7947.Google Scholar
Lovegrove, W. (1984). Dyslexia & the vision factor. Education News, 79(1), 15–18.Google Scholar
Lovegrove, W.J., Garzia, R.P., & Nicholson, S.B. (1990). Experimental evidence for a transient system deficit in specific reading disability. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 61, 137–146.Google Scholar
Lovegrove, W. Martin, F., & Slaghuis, W.A. (1986). Theoretical and experimental case for a visual deficit in specific reading disability. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 225–267.Google Scholar
Lovett, M.W. (1986). Sentential structure and the perceptual spans of two samples of disabled readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15(2), 153–175.Google Scholar
Lovett, M.W. (1987). A developmental approach to reading disability: Accuracy and speed criteria of normal and deficient reading skill. Child Development, 58, 234–60.Google Scholar
Lunzer, E., & Gardiner, K. (Eds.). (1979). The effective use of reading. London: Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar
Martin, F., MacKenzie, B., Lovegrove, W., & McNicol, D. (1993). Irlen lenses and the treatment of specific reading disability. An evaluation of outcomes and processes. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 141–150.Google Scholar
McIntyre, C.W., Murray, M.E., Cronin, C.M., & Blackwell, S.L. (1978). Span of apprehension in learning disabled boys. Journal of Learning Disabilities. II(8), 468–475.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A., Yale, S. & Wilkins, A. (in press) Open trial of subjective precision tinting: A follow-up of 55 patients. Ophthalmological and Physiological Optics.Google Scholar
Mazer, S.R., Mclntyre, C.W., Murray, M.E., Till, R.E., & Blackwell, S.L. (1983). Visual persistance and information pick up in learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16(4), 221–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meares, O. (1980). Figure/ground, brightness, contrast & reading disabilities. Visible Language, 14, 13–29.Google Scholar
Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (1988). On becoming a skilled reader. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
O’Connor, P.D., Sofo, F. Kendall, L. & Olsen, G. (1990). Reading disabilities and the effects of coloured filters. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(10), 597–603, 620.Google Scholar
Paris, S.G., & Oka, E.R. (1986). Self-regulated learning among exceptional children. Exceptional Children, 53, 103– 108.Google Scholar
Pavlides, C.A. (1985). Eye movements in dyslexia: Their diagnostic significance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18(1), 42–50.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Riding, R.J., & Pugh, J.C. (1977). Iconic memory and reading performance in nine year old children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 132–137.Google Scholar
Robinson, G.L. (1990). An evaluation of the Men lenses as a treatment for specific reading disorders-commentary on M.M. Cotton and K.M. Evans. Australian Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 13–15.Google Scholar
Robinson, G.L., & Conway, R.N.F. (1990). The effects of Irlen colored lenses on specific reading skills and perception of ability: A twelve month validity study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(10), 588–597.Google Scholar
Robinson, G.L., & Conway, R.N.F. (In Press). Irlen filters and reading strategies: The effect of coloured filters on reading achievement, specific reading strategies and perception of ability. Perceptual and Motor Skills.Google Scholar
Robinson, G.L., & Miles, J. (1987). The use of coloured overlays to improve visual processing: A preliminary survey. The Exceptional Child, 34, 65–70.Google Scholar
Rourke, B.P. (1989). Nonverbal learning disabilities: The syndrome and the model. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Saint-John, L.M., & White, M.A. (1988). The effect of coloured transparencies on the reading performance of reading disabled children. Australian Journal of Psychology, 40, 403–411.Google Scholar
Sakitt, B. (1976). Iconic memory. Psychological Review, 83, 257–276.Google Scholar
Simons, H.D., & Grisham, J.D. (1987). Binocular anomalies and reading problems. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 58, 578–587.Google Scholar
Solman, R.T., Cho, H., & Dain, S.J. (1992). Colour mediated grouping effects in good and disabled readers. Ophthalmological and Physiological Optics, 11(A), 320–327.Google Scholar
Solman, R.T., Dain, S.J., & Keech, S.L. (1991). Color-mediated contrast sensitivity in disabled readers. Optometry and Vision Science, 68(5), 331–337.Google Scholar
Spache, G.D. (1976). Investigating the issues of reading disabilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Stanley, G. (1990). Rose coloured spectacles: A cure for dyslexia? Australian Psychologist, 25(2), 65–76.Google Scholar
Stanley, G. & Hall, R. (1973). Short term visual processing in dyslexies. Child Development, 44, 841–844.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K.E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K.E. (1981). The relationship between word decoding speed, general name retrieval ability and reading progress in first grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 6, 809–815.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, I., & Fowler, S. (1985). Effect of monocular occlusion on visuomotor perception and reading in dyslexic children. The Lancet, July, 13, 68–73.Google Scholar
Stokes, L.D., & Stokes, M.C. (1990). A follow-up of user’s satisfaction with Irlen filters. Irlen International Newsletter, 5(1), 3–5.Google Scholar
Stolzenberg, M.E., Ritty, J.M., Cohen, A., & Liebegmann, S. (1989). Effects of ocular functioning and time upon reading proficiency. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 60, 122–126.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J.K. (1980). Conceptual and educational implications of the use of efficient task strategies by learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 364–371.Google Scholar
Wagner, R.K. (1988). Causal relationships between the development of phonological processing abilities and the acquisition of reading skills: A meta-analysis. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34(3), 261–279.Google Scholar
Whiting, P. (1985). How difficult can reading be? New insight into reading problems. Journal of the English Teachers Association, 49, 49–55.Google Scholar
Whiting, P., & Robinson, G.L. (1988). Using Irlen coloured lenses for reading: A clinical study. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 5, 7–10.Google Scholar
Wilkins, A., & Neary, G. (1991). Some visual, optometric and perceptual effects of coloured glasses. Ophthalmological and Physiological Optics, 11, 163–171.Google Scholar
Wilkins, A., & Wilkinson, P. (1991). A tint to reduce eye strain from fluorescent lighting: Preliminary observations. Ophthalmological and Physiological Optics, 11, 172–175.Google Scholar
Williams, M.C., & Bologna, N.B. (1985). Perceptual grouping in good and poor readers. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 367–374.Google Scholar
Williams, M.C., Brannan, J.R., & Latrigue, E.K. (1987). Visual search in good and poor readers. Clinical Vision Sciences, 1, 367–371.Google Scholar
Williams, M.C., Lecluyse, K., & Rock Faucheux, A. (1992). Effective interventions for reading disability. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 63(6), 411–417.Google Scholar
Winter, S. (1987), Irlen lenses: An appraisal. Australian Educational & Developmental Psychologist, 5, 7–10.Google Scholar
Wong, B.Y.L. (1986). Metacognition and special education: A review of a view. The Journal of Special Education, 20, 9–29.Google Scholar