Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:33:53.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can Teachers’ Self-Reported Efficacy, Concerns, and Attitudes Toward Inclusion Scores Predict Their Actual Inclusive Classroom Practices?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2015

Umesh Sharma  and
Laura Sokal
Umesh Sharma*
Affiliation:
Monash University, Australia
Laura Sokal
Affiliation:
University of Winnipeg, Canada
*
Correspondence: Umesh Sharma, Faculty of Education, Building 6, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Vic. 3800, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research was undertaken to determine if significant relationships exist between teachers’ self-reported attitudes, concerns, and efficacy to teach in inclusive classrooms and their actual classroom behaviour in Winnipeg, Canada. Five teachers completed 3 scales measuring their attitudes to inclusion, their level of concerns about teaching in inclusive classrooms, and their level of efficacy for teaching in inclusive classrooms. They were observed using a newly developed scale to measure their inclusive teaching practices. Each teacher was observed from 3 to 5 hours on different occasions. Data were analysed using 1-tailed Spearman correlations. Results indicated that teachers who were highly inclusive in their classroom practices tended to have significantly lower degrees of concerns and positive attitudes to inclusion. Implications of the research for policymakers, future researchers, and teacher educators are discussed.

Keywords

inclusionefficacyconcernsattitudesteaching practices
Type
Original Articles
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , July 2016 , pp. 21 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This manuscript was accepted under the Editorship of Michael Arthur-Kelly.

References

Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 95–135. doi:10.1086/508733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmmed, M., Sharma, U., & Deppeler, J. (2012). Variables affecting teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education in Bangladesh. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12, 132–140. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01226.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alquraini, T. A. (2012). Factors related to teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusive education of students with severe intellectual disabilities in Riyadh, Saudi. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12, 170–182. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2012.01248.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avramidis, E., & Kalyva, E. (2007). The influence of teaching experience and professional development on Greek teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22, 367–389. doi:10.1080/08856250701649989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17, 129–147. doi:10.1080/08856250210129056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, J. (2004). The validation of scale to measure school principals’ attitudes toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in regular schools. Australian Psychologist, 39, 76–87. doi:10.1080/00050060410001660371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, C., Topping, K., & Jindal-Snape, D. (2013). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion in high schools. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19, 527–542. doi:10.1080/13540602.2013.827361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, K., & Woolfson, L. (2008). What teacher factors influence their attributions for children's difficulties in learning? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 527–544. doi:10.1348/000709907X268570CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cologon, K. (2012). Confidence in their own ability: Postgraduate early childhood students examining their attitudes towards inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16, 1155–1173. doi:10.1080/13603116.2010.548106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, B. G. (2002). Inclusive attitudes, strengths, and weaknesses of pre-service general educators enrolled in a curriculum infusion teacher preparation program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25, 262–277. doi:10.1177/088840640202500306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
de Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15, 331–353. doi:10.1080/13603110903030089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dueck, J. R. (2003). Issues of inclusion: The relationship between teacher attitudes towards inclusion and teacher practice (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Lethbridge, Canada.Google Scholar
Emam, M. M., & Mohamed, A. H. H. (2011). Preschool and primary school teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education in Egypt: The role of experience and self-efficacy. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 976–985. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.331Google Scholar
Engstrand, R. Z., & Roll-Pettersson, L. (2014). Inclusion of preschool children with autism in Sweden: Attitudes and perceived efficacy of preschool teachers. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 14, 170–179. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2012.01252.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forlin, C., & Chambers, D. (2011). Teacher preparation for inclusive education: Increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 17–32. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2010.540850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forlin, C., & Cooper, P. (2013). Student behaviour and emotional challenges for teachers and parents in Hong Kong. British Journal of Special Education, 40, 58–64. doi:10.1111/1467-8578.12022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forlin, C., Sharma, U., & Loreman, T. (2014). Predictors of improved teaching efficacy following basic training for inclusion in Hong Kong. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18, 718–730. doi:10.1080/13603116.2013.819941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 798–812. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horne, P. E., & Timmons, V. (2009). Making it work: Teachers’ perspectives on inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13, 273–286. doi:10.1080/13603110701433964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, J. L., White, G., & Roberts, L. (2008). Principals’ attitudes regarding inclusion of children with autism in Pennsylvania public schools. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1462–1473. doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0522-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, A. X., & Wheeler, J. J. (2007). Including children with autism in general education in China. Childhood Education, 83, 356–360. doi:10.1080/00094056.2007.10522950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, N., & Symes, W. (2013). Inclusive education for pupils with autistic spectrum disorders in secondary mainstream schools: Teacher attitudes, experience and knowledge. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17, 32–46. doi:10.1080/13603116.2011.580462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Y.-S., & Evans, D. (2013). Attitudes towards inclusion: Gaps between belief and practice. International Journal of Special Education, 26 (1), 136–146.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., Schwartz, E., & McGhie-Richmond, D. (2009). Preparing teachers for inclusive classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 535–542. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J., & Porath, M. (2011). Teaching to diversity: Creating compassionate learning communities for diverse elementary school communities. International Journal of Special Education, 26 (2), 29–41.Google Scholar
Killoran, I., Woronko, D., & Zaretsky, H. (2014). Exploring preservice teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18, 427–442. doi:10.1080/13603116.2013.784367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutrouba, K., Vamvakari, M., & Steliou, M. (2006). Factors correlated with teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of students with special educational needs in Cyprus. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21, 381–394. doi:10.1080/08856250600956162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinen, O.-P., Savolainen, H., Engelbrecht, P., Xu, J., Nel, M., Nel, N., & Tlade, D. (2013). Exploring teacher self-efficacy for inclusive practices in three diverse countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 34–44. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinen, O.-P., Savolainen, H., & Xu, J. (2012). Beijing in-service teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes towards inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 526–534. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, M.-H., Dimitrov, D. M., Das, A., & Gichuru, M. (2014). The teacher efficacy for inclusive practices (TEIP) scale: Dimensionality and factor structure. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/1471-3802.12047Google Scholar
Rakap, S., & Kaczmarek, L. (2010). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion in Turkey. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25, 59–75. doi:10.1080/08856250903450848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., Rowen, B., & Cheong, Y. F. (1992). Contextual effects on the self-perceived efficacy of high school teachers. Sociology of Education, 65, 150–167. doi:10.2307/2112680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Research Ethics Panel. (2014). Tri-Council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Retrieved March 15, 2015, from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2-2014/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdfGoogle Scholar
Roll-Pettersson, L. (2008). Teacher's perceived efficacy and the inclusion of a pupil with dyslexia or mild mental retardation: Findings from Sweden. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 174–185.Google Scholar
Ross, J. A., Cousins, J. B., & Gadalla, T. (1996). Within-teacher predictors of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 385–400. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(95)00046-MCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross-Hill, R. (2009). Teacher attitude towards inclusion practices and special needs students. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 9, 188–198. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2009.01135.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruijs, N. M., & Peetsma, T. T. D. (2009). Effects of inclusion on students with and without special educational needs reviewed. Educational Research Review, 4, 67–79. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2009.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savolainen, H., Engelbrecht, P., Nel, M., & Malinen, O.-P. (2012). Understanding teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy in inclusive education: Implications for pre-service and in-service teacher education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27, 51–68. doi:10.1080/08856257.2011.613603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, U., & Chow, E. W. S. (2008). The attitudes of Hong Kong primary school principals toward integrated education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9, 380–391. doi:10.1007/BF03026725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, U., & Desai, I. (2002). Measuring concerns about integrated education in India. Asia and Pacific Journal on Disability, 5 (1), 2–14.Google Scholar
Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12, 12–21. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, U., & Sokal, L. (2013). The impact of a teacher education course on pre-service teachers’ beliefs about inclusion: An international comparison. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/1471-3802.12043Google Scholar
Silverman, J. C. (2007). Epistemological beliefs and attitudes toward inclusion in pre-service teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30 (1), 42–51. doi:10.1177/088840640703000105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. G. (2000). Secondary teachers’ perceptions toward inclusion of students with severe disabilities. NASSP Bulletin, 84 (613), 54–60. doi:10.1177/019263650008461309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, L., & Sharma, U. (2014). Canadian in-service teachers’ concerns, efficacy, and attitudes about inclusive teaching. Exceptionality Education International, 23 (1), 59–71. Retrieved from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei/vol23/iss1/5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soodak, L. C., Podell, D. M., & Lehman, L. R. (1998). Teacher, student, and school attributes as predictors of teachers’ responses to inclusion. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 480–497. doi:10.1177/002246699803100405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, P. J., & Jordan, A. (1998). Canadian teachers’ and principals’ beliefs about inclusive education as predictors of effective teaching in heterogeneous classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 98, 221–238. doi:10.1086/461892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unianu, E. M. (2012). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 900–904. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.252Google Scholar
Weisel, A., & Dror, O. (2006). School climate, sense of efficacy and Israeli teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion of students with special needs. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1, 157–174. doi:10.1177/1746197906064677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheim, C., & Leyser, Y. (2002). Efficacy beliefs, background variables, and differentiated instruction in Israeli prospective teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 54–63. doi:10.1080/00220670209598791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarkoni, T. (2009). Big correlations in little studies: Inflated fMRI correlations reflect low statistical power—Commentary on Vul et al. (2009). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 294–298. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01127.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed