Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:09:46.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioural and Cognitive Approaches to Social Skills Training with Young Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Richard Taffe  and
Ian D. Smith
Richard Taffe*
Affiliation:
Selective Schools Unit, NSW Department of School Education
Ian D. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
*
Correspondence concerning this paper should be addressed to Mr Richard Taffe, Selective Schools Unit, Department of School Education, PO Box 6000, Parramatta, NSW, 2124.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Establishing peer relationships is an important part of social development in children. Children who are social isolates or rejected by their peers may be at risk in their social relationships during adolescence and adulthood. Two main approaches to intervening in peer relationships have been employed over the past sixty years: the first emphasises the individual’s role as a member of a peer group, while the second focusses on improving social skill learning and performance. The research evidence is reviewed with respect to both these theoretical approaches, with the social skills training (SST) approach being generally more clearly supported. Problems with the generalisation of social skills learned in the training program to actual social situations and to improved peer relationships are seen as requiring an extension of the behavioural SST approach. A social cognitive strategy which coaches children in making self-efficacy judgements of their ability to perform a task successfully is claimed to be a useful adjunct to the SST program. Specific teaching/coaching points are included as a guide to teachers who wish to help children improve their social skills and peer relationships.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , 1994 , pp. 26 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alden, L.E. & Wallace, S.T. (1991). Social standards and social withdrawal. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15(1), 85–100.Google Scholar
Allen, E.K., Hart, B., Buell, J.S., Harris, F.R. & Wolfe, M.M. (1964). Effects of social reinforcement on isolate behaviour of a nursery school child. Child Development. 35, 511–518.Google ScholarPubMed
Asher, S.R. (1990). Recent advances in the study of peer rejection. In Asher, S.R. & Coie, J.D. (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp.3–14). New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asher, S.R., Hymel, S. & Renshaw, P. (1984). Loneliness in children. Child Development, 55, 1456–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, S.R. & Parker, J.G. (1989). Significance of peer relationship problems in childhood. In Schneider, B.H., Attili, G., Nadel, J. & Weissberg, R.P. (Eds.), Social competence in developmental perspective (pp.5–23). Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Asher, S.R. & Renshaw, P.D. (1981). Children without friends: Social knowledge and social-skill training. In Asher, S.R. & Gottman, J.M. (Eds.), The development of children ‘s friendships (pp.273–296). London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bagarozzi, D. (1985). Implications of social skills training for social and interpersonal competence. In L’Abate, L. & Milan, M.A. (Eds.), Handbook of social skills training and research (pp.604–617). New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behaviour change. Child Development, 48, 191–215.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1981). Self-referent thought: a developmental analysis of self-efficacy. In Flavell, J.H. & Ross, L. (Eds.), Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1991). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-reactive mechanisms. In Dienstbier, R.A. (Ed.) Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1990: Perspectives on motivation, Vol. 38, (pp.69–164). Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. & Adams, N.E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behaviour change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7(4), 287–310.Google Scholar
Bandura, A., Adams, N.E., Hardy, A.B. and Howells, G.N. (1980). Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4(1), 39–66.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. & Schunk, D.H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586–598.Google Scholar
Berndt, T.J. (1989). Contributions of peer relationships to children’s development. In Berndt, T.J. & Ladd, G.W. (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development (pp.407–416). New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bierman, K.L. (1986). Process of change during social skills training with préadolescents and its relation to treatment outcome. Child Development, 57, 230–240.Google Scholar
Bierman, K.L. & Furman, W. (1984). The effects of social skills training and peer involvement on the social adjustment of preadolescents. Child Development, 55, 151–162.Google Scholar
Bukowski, W.M. & Hoza, B. (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement and outcome. In Berndt, T.J. & Ladd, G.W. (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development, (pp. 15–45). New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Chittenden, G.F. (1942). An experimental study in measuring and modifying assertive behaviour in young children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 7 (1, Serial No. 31).Google Scholar
Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A. & Kupersmidt, J.B. (1990). Peer group behaviour and social status. In Asher, S.R. & Coie, J.D. (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17–59). New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corsaro, W.A. (1981). Friendship in the nursery school: Social organisation in a peer environment. In Asher, S.R. & Gottman, J.M. (Eds.), The development of children’s friendships (pp.207–241). London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dodge, K.A. & Feldman, E. (1990). Issues in social cognition and sociometrie status. In Asher, S.R. & Coie, J.D. (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp.119–155). New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
C. A., Erdley & Asher, S.R. (1993). To aggress or not to aggress: Social-cognitive mediators of children ‘s responses to ambiguous provocation. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Ellis, S., Rogoff, B. & Cramer, C.C. (1981). Age segregation in children’s social interactions. Developmental Psychology, 17, 339–407.Google Scholar
Fine, G.A. (1981). Friends, impression management, and preadolescent behaviour. In Asher, S.R. & Gottman, J.M. (Eds.), The development of children’s friendships (pp.29–52). London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Furman, W. (1982). Children’s friendships. In Field, T.M., Huston, A., Quay, H.C., Troll, L. & Finley, G.E. (Eds.), Review of human development (pp.327–339). New York, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Harper, L.V. & Huie, K.S. (1985). The effects of prior group experience, age, and familiarity on the quality of organisation of preschoolers’ social relationships. Child Development, 56, 704–717.Google Scholar
Hartup, W.W. (1983). Peer relations. In R.H., Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed.) (pp.103–196). New York, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hymel, S. (1986). Interpretations of peer behaviour: Affective bias in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 57, 431–445.Google Scholar
Hymel, S., Wagner, E. & Butler, L.J. (1990). Reputational bias: View from the peer group. In Asher, S.R. & Coie, J.D. (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp.156–186). New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, M.F. & Carlson, P.M. (1974). The use of symbolic modelling to promote social skills in preschool children with low levels of social responsiveness. Child Development, 45, 912–919.Google Scholar
Kerby, F.D. & Tolar, H.C. (1970). Modification of preschool isolate behaviour A case study. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 3, 309–314.Google Scholar
Koch, H.L. (1935). The modification of unsocialness in preschool children. Psychology Bulletin, 32, 700–701.Google Scholar
Kupersmidt, J.K., Coie, J.D. & Dodge, K.A. (1990). The role of poor peer relations in the development of disorder. In Asher, S.R. & Coie, J.D. (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp.274–305). New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, G.W. (1985). Documenting the effects of social skill training with children: Process and outcome assessment. In Schneider, B.H., Rubin, K.H. & Ledingham, J.D. (Eds.), Children’s peer relations: Issues in assessment and intervention (pp.243–269). New York, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Ladd, G.W. & Asher, S.R. (1985). Social skill training and children’s peer relations. In L’Abate, L. & Milan, M.A. (Eds.), Handbook of social skills training and research (pp.219–244). New York, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Ladd, G.W. & Mize, J. (1983). A cognitive-social learning model of social-skill training. Psychological Review, 90(2), 127–157.Google Scholar
Ladd, G.W., Price, J.M. & Hart, C.H. (1988). Predicting preschoolers’ peer status from their playground behaviours. Child Development, 59, 986–992.Google Scholar
Matson, J.L. & Ollendick, T.H. (1988). Enhancing children ‘s social skills: Assessment and training. New York, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Mize, J. & Ladd, G.W. (1990). Toward the development of successful social skills training for preschool children. In Asher, S.R. & Coie, J.D. (Eds). Peer rejection in childhood (pp.338–361). New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moreno, J.L. (1934). Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Washington, D.C., Nervous and Mental Diseases Publishing.Google Scholar
Morison, P. & Masten, A.S. (1991). Peer reputation in middle childhood as a predictor of adaptation in adolescence: A seven year follow-up. Child Development, 62, 991–1007.Google Scholar
Oden, S. & Asher, S.R. (1977). Coaching children in social skills for friendship making. Child Development, 48, 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putallaz, M. (1983). Predicting children’s sociometrie status from their behaviour. Child Development, 54, 1417–1426.Google Scholar
Renshaw, P.D. (1981). The roots of current peer interaction research: A historical analysis of the 1930s. In Asher, S.R. & Gottman, J.M. (Eds.), The development of children’s friendships (pp. 1–25). London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roff, M.F. (1961). Childhood social interactions and adult bad conduct. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 333–337.Google Scholar
Schneider, B.H. (1989). Between developmental wisdom and children’s social-skills training. In Schneider, B.H., Attili, G., Nadel, J., & Weissberg, R.P. (Eds.), Social competence in developmental perspective (pp.339–353). Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B.H. & Byrne, B.M. (1985). Children’s social skills training: A meta-analysis. In Schneider, B.H., Rubin, K.H. & Ledingham, J.D. (Eds.), Children ‘s peer relations: Issues in assessment and intervention (pp. 175–192). New York, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Schunk, D.H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children’s achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schunk, D.H. (1991). Learning theories: An educational perspective. New York, Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Shaffer, D.R. (1988). Social and personality development. (2nd ed.) Pacific Grove, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Wheeler, V. & Ladd, G.W. (1982). Assessment of children’s self-efficacy for social interactions with peers. Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 795–805.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B.J., Bandura, A. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676.Google Scholar