Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:38:36.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rhetoric, Accountability, Advocacy: Postschool Transition of Students With Specific Learning Difficulties in Hong Kong*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2013

Kim Fong Poon-McBrayer
Kim Fong Poon-McBrayer*
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong
*
Correspondence: Kim Fong Poon-McBrayer, Department of Education Policy and Leadership, Hong Kong Institute of Education, 10 Lo Ping Road, Tai Po, N.T., Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The international literature reflects the significance of transition services for postschool outcomes of students with disabilities. In 2008, the Hong Kong Government introduced a policy to support students with disabilities, especially those with specific learning difficulties (SLD), to transition to postschool life in inclusive settings. This article focuses on the status of policy implementation in Hong Kong and its link to the higher education participation of students with SLD. Analyses are based on expectations of policymakers for school practices in transition services, parental experiences, and a discussion forum involving postsecondary students with SLD, advocacy groups, and university student affair personnel. Findings reveal a lack of expectation for implementation and school accountability from policymakers, an extremely low participation rate of students with SLD in higher education, a slow development of support systems in higher education, and the significant role played by an advocacy group on moving the higher education support forward in the absence of a policy mandate. By focusing on the close relationship between transition services and postsecondary outcomes, the use of legislation for disability policies to ensure the provision of transition services and the role of self and external advocacy to lobby for such legislation are recommended and discussed.

Keywords

learning disabilitiestransition servicespolicy rhetoricschool accountabilityadvocacy
Type
Articles
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 37 , Special Issue 1: Transitions for Students With Special Educational Needs , July 2013 , pp. 4 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This manuscript was accepted under the Guest Editorship of Chris Forlin.

References

Algozzine, B., Browder, D., Karvonen, M., Test, D.W., & Wood, W.M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 219–277. doi:10.3102/00346543071002219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanases, S.Z., & Martin, K.J. (2006). Learning to advocate for educational equity in a teacher credential program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 627–646. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1, 385–405. doi:10.1177/146879410100100307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Government ComLaw. (2005). Disability standards for education 2005. Retrieved from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2005L00767Google Scholar
Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee. (2006). AVCC guidelines relating to students with a disability. Canberra, Australia: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/page/policy—advocacy/equity/students-with-a-disability/Google Scholar
Blalock, G., & Patton, J.R. (1996). Transition and students with learning disabilities: Creating sound futures. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 7–16. doi:10.1177/002221949602900104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandt, S. (2011). From policy to practice in higher education: The experiences of disabled students in Norway. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 58, 107–120. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2011.570494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, L., Wildy, H., & Saggers, S. (2011). Challenges in implementing wellness approaches in childhood disability services: Views from the field. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 58, 137–153. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2011.570500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bringewatt, E.H., & Gershoff, E.T. (2010). Falling through the cracks: Gaps and barriers in the mental health system for America's disadvantaged children. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1291–1299. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.04.021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameto, R., Knokey, A., & Sanford, C. (2011). Participation in postsecondary education of young adults with learning disabilities: Findings from NLTS2. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17 (2), 45–54.Google Scholar
Cameto, R., Levine, P., & Wagner, M. (2004). Transition planning for students with disabilities: A special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2004_11/nlts2_report_2004_11_complete.pdfGoogle Scholar
Chan, D.W., Ho, C.S-H., Tsang, S-M., Lee, S-H., & Chung, K.K.H. (2007). Prevalence, gender ratio and gender differences in reading-related cognitive abilities among Chinese children with dyslexia in Hong Kong. Educational Studies, 33, 249–265. doi:10.1080/03055690601068535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, F.C.M. (2008). Time to take a new look at specific learning difficulties. Hong Kong Journal of Paediatrics, 13, 208–212.Google Scholar
Connor, D.J. (2012). Helping students with disabilities transition to college: 21 tips for students with LD and/or ADD/ADHD. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44 (5), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A.L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortiella, C., & National Center for Learning Disabilities I. Y. (2006). IDEA parent guide: A Comprehensive guide to your rights and responsibilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA 2004). New York, NY: National Center for Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
Dalke, C., & Schmitt, S. (1987). Meeting the transition needs of college-bound students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 176–180. doi:10.1177/002221948702000306CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA). (1992). Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/dda1992264/Google Scholar
Disability Discrimination Ordinance. (1995). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.hk/blis_pdf.nsf/6799165D2FEE3FA94825755E0033E532/D72F7A7DE6892EEE482575EF000ED92F?OpenDocument&bt=0Google Scholar
Education Bureau. (2012). Education Bureau circular No. 13/2012: Learning support grant for secondary schools. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/edu-system/special/support/wsa/secondary/circular_LSGSS_e_6.8.2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
Education Commission. (1990). Education Commission report No. 4; The curriculum and behavioural problems in schools. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/about-edb/publications-stat/major-reports/ecr4_e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Flynn, E. (2010). A socio-legal analysis of advocacy for people with disabilities: Competing concepts of ‘best interests’ and empowerment in legislation and policy on statutory advocacy services. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 32, 23–36. doi:10.1080/09649061003675840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forlin, C. (2010a). Developing and implementing quality inclusive education in Hong Kong: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 10, 177–184. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01162.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forlin, C. (2010b). Teacher education reform for enhancing teachers’ preparedness for inclusion [Editorial]. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14, 649–653. doi:10.1080/13603111003778353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M., Healey, M., Bradley, A., & Hall, T. (2004). Barriers to learning: A systematic study of the experience of disabled students in one university. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 303–318. doi:10.1080/03075070410001682592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, P.J. (2001). Professional advocacy: Widening the scope of accountability. Nursing Philosophy, 2, 151–162. doi:10.1046/j.1466-769X.2001.00048.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, T., & Mascia, J. (2005). Adult rehabilitation training programs and support services: A collaborative, person-centered approach [Editorial]. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 42 (3), vii–x.Google ScholarPubMed
Hadley, W.M. (2011). College students with disabilities: A student development perspective. New Directions for Higher Education, 2011 (154), 77–81. doi:10.1002/he.436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, M.R. (2004). Using the self-advocacy strategy to increase student participation in IEP conferences. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39, 295–300. doi:10.1177/10534512040390050601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong Kong Government. (1977). Integrating the disabled into the community: A unified effort. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManager/EN/Content_689/disabl_e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hong Kong Government. (1978). The development of senior secondary and tertiary education. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/about-edb/publications-stat/major-reports/secter_e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hong Kong Primary Education Research Association & Special Education Society of Hong Kong. (2006). Report on the study of integrated education in Hong Kong primary schools. Hong Kong: Author.Google Scholar
Hung, R.H.C. (2010, July). SLD in tertiary education in Hong Kong: A report. Paper presented in Hong Kong Child Neurology & Developmental Pediatrics Conference on Dyslexia, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Individuals with Disability Education Act (IDEA) Amendments of 1997, U.S.C. §1400 et seq. (1997).Google Scholar
Janiga, S.J., & Costenbader, V. (2002). The transition from high school to postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities: A survey of college service coordinators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 463–470. doi:10.1177/00222194020350050601CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jockey Club Learning Support Network Project Brief. (2006). Project overview: Specific learning difficulties factsheet. Retrieved from http://www.hkjc.com/english/news/images/SpLDFactsheet_e.docGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D.R., Bruininks, R.H., & Thurlow, M.L. (1987). Meeting the challenge of transition service planning through improved interagency cooperation. Exceptional Children, 53, 522–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katsiyannis, A., Zhang, D., Landmark, L., & Reber, A. (2009). Postsecondary education for individuals with disabilities: Legal and practice considerations. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 20, 35–45. doi:10.1177/1044207308324896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavale, K.A., Spaulding, L.S., & Beam, A.P. (2009). A time to define: Making the specific learning disability definition prescribe specific learning disability. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, P.D., & Field, S. (2003). Transition-focused education: Foundation for the future. Journal of Special Education, 37, 174–183. doi:10.1177/00224669030370030701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosine, N.R. (2007). Preparing students with learning disabilities for postsecondary education: What the research literature tells us about transition programs. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 20 (2), 93–104.Google Scholar
Kovacs Burns, K., & Gordon, G.L. (2010). Analyzing the impact of disability legislation in Canada and the United States. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 20, 205–218. doi:10.1177/1044207309344562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrabee, T.G., & Morehead, P. (2010). Broadening views of social justice and teacher leadership: Addressing LGB issues in teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 19 (2), 37–52.Google Scholar
Larson, K., Grudens-Schuck, N., & Allen, B.L. (2004). Can you call it a focus group? Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. Retrieved from http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM1969A.pdfGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Martin, E.W., Martin, R., & Terman, D.L. (1996). The legislative and litigation history of special education. The Future of Children, 6 (1), 25–39. doi:10.2307/1602492CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGukin, C., Shevlin, M., Bell, S., & Devecchi, C. (2011). Study of access and progression of students with special educational needs: Moving from compulsory education to further or higher education (Research Report). Dublin, Ireland: National Council for Special Education.Google Scholar
Merriman, S. (2007). TransMap: From theory into practice. The underlying principles in supporting disabled young people in transition to adulthood. London, UK: Council for Disabled Children and the Department for Children, Schools and Families.Google Scholar
Mishna, F., Muskat, B., Farnia, F., & Wiener, J. (2011). The effects of a school-based program on the reported self-advocacy knowledge of students with learning disabilities. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 57, 185–203.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2006). Introduction of special education. Retrieved from http://english.moe.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=11631&ctNode=508&=11Google Scholar
The National Archives. (2010). Equality Act 2010. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contentsGoogle Scholar
National Center on Secondary Education and Transition. (2007). IEP and transition planning. Retrieved from http://www.ncset.org/topics/ieptransition/default.asp?topic=28Google Scholar
Ng, P.T. (2008). Education policy rhetoric and reality gap: A reflection. International Journal of Educational Management, 22, 595–602. doi:10.1108/09513540810895471Google Scholar
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2001).Google Scholar
Pascall, G., & Hendey, N. (2004). Disability and transition to adulthood: The politics of parenting. Critical Social Policy, 24, 165–186. doi:10.1177/0261018304041949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Phillips, P. (1990). A self-advocacy plan for high school students with learning disabilities: A comparative case study analysis of students’, teachers’, and parents’ perceptions of program effects. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 466–471. doi:10.1177/002221949002300803CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polat, F., Kalambouka, A., Boyle, W.F, & Nelson, N. (2001). Post-16 transitions of students with special educational needs (Research Report RR315). London, UK: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
Poon-McBrayer, K.F. (2004). To integrate or not to integrate: Systemic dilemmas in Hong Kong. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 249–256. doi:10.1177/00224669040370040401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poon-McBrayer, K.F. (2005). Full inclusion of children with severe learning disabilities: Ideology and Reality. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 8, 19–26.Google Scholar
Poon-McBrayer, K.F. (2009). Toward a holistic reform: Supporting students with disabilities after 3+3. Hong Kong Special Education Forum, 11, 1–11.Google Scholar
Poon-McBrayer, K.F. (2011). Inclusion without boundaries: Lessons from practices of three special-general schools. Saarbrücken, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Poon-McBrayer, K.F. (2012). Bridging policy–practice gap: Protecting rights of youth with learning disabilities in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1909–1914. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaddock, A.J. (2003). People with disabilities in the era of the “triple bottom line”. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 28, 90–93. doi:10.1080/1366825031000086948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Switzer, J.V. (2003). Disabled rights: American disability policy and the fight for equality. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtmlGoogle Scholar
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2009). Tenth meeting of the Working Group on Education for All (EFA): Concept paper on marginalization. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/EFAWG2009/conceptpaper_marginalization.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNESCO Bangkok. (2011). Barriers to inclusive education. Retrieved from http://www.unescobkk.org/education/inclusive-education/what-is-inclusive-education/barriers-to-inclusive-education/Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Building the legacy: IDEA 2004. Retrieved from http://idea.ed.gov/Google Scholar
Wagner, M., Newman, L., D'Amico, R., Jay, E. D., Butler-Nalin, P., Marder, C., & Cox, R. (1991). Youth with disabilities: How are they doing? The first comprehensive report from the national longitudinal transition study of special education students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Palmer, S.B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.Google Scholar
Wehmeyer, M., & Schwartz, M. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar