Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:29:23.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap: Implementing the Research-to-Practice Model

Part of: AJSIE Special Education Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2018

Christine Grima-Farrell
Christine Grima-Farrell*
Affiliation:
UNSW Sydney, Australia
*
Correspondence: Christine Grima-Farrell, School of Education, UNSW Arts & Social Sciences, Room 133, John Goodsell Building, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years, researchers have worked closely with parents, teachers, other school staff, and external stakeholders to increase knowledge on ways to effectively teach children and adolescents with disabilities in mainstream school settings. State, national, and global directives have encouraged the implementation of research-based practices and contributed to advocacy efforts for students with and without disabilities. In a longitudinal comparative case study, Grima-Farrell (2017) responded to these movements by striving to enhance teacher knowledge on how to effectively implement and sustain the use of validated teaching approaches to maximise the student engagement and success of all students. This paper specifically reports on the school-based efforts of 6 experienced teachers as they strive to implement research-based practices to respond to the diverse needs of their students. Results are presented using the research-to-practice model (Grima-Farrell, 2017) as a conceptual framework for guiding instructional decision-making through the implementation and sustained use of validated educational research approaches.

Keywords

research-to-practiceschool-based interventionsschool–university partnershipsprofessional developmentteacher education
Type
Special Education Perspectives
Information
Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education , Volume 42 , Special Issue 1: Preparing Special and Inclusive Educators for Their New Roles in the 21st Century , July 2018 , pp. 82 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*This manuscript was accepted under the Editorship of David Paterson.

References

Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth. (2013). Inclusive education for students with disability: A review of the best evidence in relation to theory and practice. Retrieved from http://www.aracy.org.au/publications-resources/command/download_file/id/246/filename/Inclusive_education_for_students_with_disability_-_A_review_of_the_best_evidence_in_relation_to_theory_and_practice.pdfGoogle Scholar
Black-Hawkins, K., & Florian, L. (2012). Classroom teachers’ craft knowledge of their inclusive practice. Teachers and Teaching, 18, 567–584. doi:10.1080/13540602.2012.709732Google Scholar
Bridgeland, J., & Orszag, P. (2013). Can government play moneyball? The Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/07/can-government-play-moneyball/309389/Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.568CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, M., Stephenson, J., & Strnadová, I. (2011). Reported prevalence by Australian special educators of evidence-based instructional practices. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 35, 47–60. doi:10.1375/ajse.35.1.47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia. (2005). Disability standards for education 2005 plus guidance notes. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/disability_standards_for_education_2005_plus_guidance_notes.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cook, B. G., & Schirmer, B. R. (2003). What is special about special education? Overview and analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 200–205. doi:10.1177/00224669030370031001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Prepping our teachers for teaching as a profession. Education Digest, 71 (4), 22–27.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 120–138. doi:10.1177/0022487105283796Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (2011). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. Moorabbin, Australia: Hawker Brownlow Education.Google Scholar
Earles-Vollrath, T. L. (2012). Research to practice: Closing the gap. Intervention in School and Clinic, 47, 135–138. doi:10.1177/1053451211423818Google Scholar
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114–95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2015–2016).Google Scholar
Foreman, P., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2014). Inclusion in action (4th ed.). South Melbourne, Australia: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Forlin, C. (2007). A collaborative, collegial and more cohesive approach to supporting educational reform for inclusion in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8, 276–287. doi:10.1007/BF03029262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forlin, C. (Ed.). (2010). Teacher education for inclusion: Changing paradigms and innovative approaches. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forlin, C., Kawai, N., & Higuchi, S. (2015). Educational reform in Japan towards inclusion: Are we training teachers for success? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19, 314–331. doi:10.1080/13603116.2014.930519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, A. (2014). Is this inclusion? Lessons from a very ‘special’ unit. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18, 379–391. doi:10.1080/13603116.2013.777130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grima-Farrell, C. (2014). Curriculum-Based Measurement of Oral Reading fluency (CBM-R): An objective orientated evaluation study. Support for Learning, 29, 370–393. doi:10.1111/1467-9604.12067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grima-Farrell, C. (2017). What matters in a research to practice cycle? Teachers as researchers. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2087-2Google Scholar
Grima-Farrell, C. R., Bain, A., & McDonagh, S. H. (2011). Bridging the research-to-practice gap: A review of the literature focusing on inclusive education. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 35, 117–136. doi:10.1375/ajse.35.2.117Google Scholar
Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hord, S. M., Rutherford, W. L., Huling-Austin, L., & Hall, G. E. (1987). Taking charge of change. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. (2004). Pub. L. No. 108–466, 20 U.S.C. §1400, H.R. 1350.Google Scholar
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2010). How teacher education can make a difference. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36, 407–423. doi:10.1080/02607476.2010.513854Google Scholar
Kurniawati, F., De Boer, A. A., Minnaert, A. E. M. G., & Mangunsong, F. (2014). Characteristics of primary teacher training programmes on inclusion: A literature focus. Educational Research, 56, 310–326. doi:10.1080/00131881.2014.934555Google Scholar
Madelaine, A., & Wheldall, K. (2004). Curriculum-based measurement of reading: Recent advances. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 51, 57–82. doi:10.1080/1034912042000182201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, B. K., Eckert, T. L., Begeny, J. C., Lewandowski, L. J., DiGennaro, F. D., Montarello, S. A., . . . Fiese, B. H. (2007). Effects of a fluency-building program on the reading performance of low-achieving second and third grade students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 38–53. doi:10.1007/s10864-006-9022-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
McGrath, H., & Noble, T. (2010). Supporting positive pupil relationships: Research to practice. Educational & Child Psychology, 27, 79–90.Google Scholar
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C.A. § 6301 et seq.Google Scholar
Olswang, L. B., & Prelock, P. A. (2015). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Implementation science. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, S1818–S1826. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0305Google Scholar
Schulz, R. (2010). Inquiry-orientated teacher education. In P. Peterson, L., Baker, E., & McGaw, B. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 604–609). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795–819. doi:10.1002/pits.20113Google Scholar
UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar