Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:21:00.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examining the Influence of Error Climate on Aviation Maintenance Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2014

Megan Elizabeth Hodges  and
Dianne Gardner
Megan Elizabeth Hodges
Affiliation:
Royal New Zealand Air Force, Ohakea, New Zealand
Dianne Gardner*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand
*
address for correspondence: Dr Dianne Gardner, School of Psychology, Massey University, Private Bag 102 904, North Shore Mail Centre, Auckland, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Error climate refers to shared perceptions of organisational practices regarding errors. Error management climate (EMC), which acknowledges the inevitability of error, and error avoidance climate (EAC), characterised by fear of error and reluctance to discuss error, were explored in relation to supervision, stress, fatigue, psychological ill-health and violations. Errors are of particular concern in the aviation industry, particularly aviation maintenance. The focus of the present study was on perceptions of error climate among Technical Trade personnel in the Royal New Zealand Air Force. Participants were 189 personnel below the rank of Flight Sergeant, all in practical maintenance roles. Perceptions of EMC were associated with better perceived supervision and psychological health, and less EAC, fewer violations and errors. Perceptions of EAC were associated with more violations and errors, and worse psychological health and perceived supervision. Two types of violations were identified. Situational violations were predicted by routine violations, errors, stress and seniority. Routine violations were predicted by situational violations, errors and fatigue. Violations partially mediated the effect of error climate on errors. These findings suggest that error climate is an important organisational factor in safety and aviation maintenance.

Keywords

aviationerror managementerror climate
Type
Articles
Information
The Australasian Journal of Organisational Psychology , Volume 7 , 2014 , e1
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alper, S.J., & Karsh, B-T. (2009). A systematic review of safety violations in industry. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 739–754.Google Scholar
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.Google Scholar
Christian, M.S., Bradley, J.C., Wallace, J.C., & Burke, M.J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1103–1127.Google Scholar
Cigularov, K.P., Chen, P.Y., & Rosecrance, J. (2010). The effects of error management climate and safety communication on safety: A multi-level study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 1498–1506.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. (2006). The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 315–327.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., & Wright, T.A. (2001). When a ‘happy’ worker is really a ‘productive’ worker: A review and further refinement of the happy-productive worker thesis. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53 (3), 182–199.Google Scholar
Edmondson, A.C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organisational influences on the detection and correction of human error. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 32, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, M.A., Mazor, K.M., Baril, J., Alper, E., DeMarco, D., & Pugnaire, M. (2006). Learning from mistakes: Factors that influence how students and residents learn from medical errors. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 419–423.Google Scholar
Fogarty, G. (2004). The role of organizational and individual differences variables in aircraft maintenance performance. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 4, 73–90.Google Scholar
Fogarty, G. (2005). Psychological strain mediates the impact of safety climate on maintenance errors. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 5, 53–63.Google Scholar
Fogarty, G.J., & Buikstra, E. (2008). A test of direct and indirect pathways linking safety climate, psychological health, and unsafe behaviours. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 8, 199–210.Google Scholar
Frese, M., & Altmann, A. (1989). The treatment of errors in learning and training. In Bainbridge, L. & Quintanilla, A. Ruiz (Eds.), Developing skills with information technology (pp. 65–86). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D.P. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haddon-Cave, C. (2009). The Nimrod Review: An independent review into the broader issues surrounding the loss of the RAF Nimrod MR2 Aircraft XV230 in Afghanistan in 2006. London: The stationery office. Retrieved November 18, 2011, from http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/hc0809/hc10/1025/1025.pdfGoogle Scholar
Heimbeck, D., Frese, M., Sonnentag, S., & Keith, N. (2003). Integrating errors into the training process: The function of error management instructions and the role of goal orientation. Personnel Psychology, 56, 333–361.Google Scholar
Helmreich, R.L. (2000). On error management: Lessons from aviation. British Medical Journal, 320, 781–785.Google Scholar
Hobbs, A., & Williamson, A. (2002). Unsafe acts and unsafe outcomes in aircraft maintenance. Ergonomics, 45, 866–882.Google Scholar
Hobbs, A., & Williamson, A. (2003). Associations between errors and contributing factors in aircraft maintenance. Human Factors, 45, 186–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, D.A., & Mark, B. (2006). An investigation of the relationship between safety climate and medication errors as well as other nurse and patient outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 59, 847–869.Google Scholar
Hughes, L.C., Chang, Y., & Mark, B.A. (2009). Quality and strength of patient safety climate on medical-surgical units. Healthcare Management Review, January-March, 19–27.Google Scholar
Keyes, C.L.M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C.D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (6), 1007–1022.Google Scholar
Lawton, R. (1998). Not working to rule: Understanding procedural violations at work. Safety Science, 28, 77–95.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R.S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
May, J.F., & Baldwin, C.L. (2009). Driver fatigue: The importance of identifying causal factors of fatigue when considering detection and countermeasure technologies. Transportation Research, 12, 218–224.Google Scholar
McDonald, N., Corrigan, S., Cromie, S., & Daly, C. (2000). Safety management systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance organisations. Safety Science, 34, 151–176.Google Scholar
Naikar, N., & Saunders, A. (2003). Crossing the boundaries of safe operation: An approach for training technical skills in error management. Cognitive Technology Work, 5, 171–180.Google Scholar
Neal, A., & Griffin, M.A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 946–953.Google Scholar
Oliver, A., Cheyne, A., Tomas, J.M., & Cox, S. (2002). The effects of organizational and individual factors on occupational accidents. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, B., & Kanki, B.G. (2008). Best practices in shift turnovers: Implications for reducing aviation maintenance turnover errors as revealed in ASRS reports. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 18, 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reason, J., & Hobbs, A. (2003). Managing maintenance error: A practical guide. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Rybowiak, V., Garst, H., Frese, M., Batinic, B. (1999). Error orientation questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 527–547.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simard, M., & Marchand, A. (1997). Workgroups’ propensity to comply with safety rules: The influence of micro-macro organisational factors. Ergonomics, 40, 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, D., & Coplen, M. (2000). Fatigue and alertness in the United States railroad industry part I: The nature of the problem. Transportation Research, 3, 211–220.Google Scholar
Van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: A two study replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1228–1240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Dyck, C. (2008). The tragic 1996 Everest expedition: A tale of error culture. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 22–34.Google Scholar
Wiegmann, D.A., & Shappell, S.A. (2001). Human error perspectives in aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11, 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohar, D. (2008). Safety climate and beyond: A multi-level multi-climate framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 616–628.Google Scholar