Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 August 2014
To some extent, this paper provides theoretical back-up for Taylor's (1980b) see-saw method of analysis of outstanding claims.
Section 3 deals with the payments per claim finalized (PPCF) method. This assumes PPCF to be a function of development year only.
Section 4 carries out a theoretical investigation of the validity of this assumption. It is found that the assumption is not justified in general; that PPCF can (and usually will) be sensitive to changes in speed of finalization of claims; and that this sensitivity will depend on the convexity properties of PPCF as a function of development year. The analysis is made on the basis of the so-called hypothesis of invariant order.
Section 5 develops the see-saw method from this theoretical basis, although Section 7 is at pains to point to situations in which that method remains applicable despite violation of the hypothesis of invariant order.
Section 6 provides a numerical example.