Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:06:11.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ROBUST STABILITY, STABILISATION AND H-INFINITY CONTROL FOR PREMIUM-RESERVE MODELS IN A MARKOVIAN REGIME SWITCHING DISCRETE-TIME FRAMEWORK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2016

Lin Yang ,
Athanasios A. Pantelous  and
Hirbod Assa
Lin Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK E-Mail: [email protected]
Athanasios A. Pantelous*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, Institute for Risk and Uncertainty, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Hirbod Assa
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, Institute for Risk and Uncertainty, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK E-Mail: [email protected]
*
E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The premium pricing process and the medium- and long-term stability of the reserve policy under conditions of uncertainty present very challenging issues in relation to the insurance world. Over the last two decades, applications of Markovian regime switching models to finance and macroeconomics have received strong attention from researchers, and particularly market practitioners. However, relatively little research has so far been carried out in relation to insurance. This paper attempts to consider how a linear Markovian regime switching system in discrete-time could be applied to model the medium- and long-term reserves and the premiums (abbreviated here as the P-R process) for an insurer. Some recently developed techniques from linear robust control theory are applied to explore the stability, stabilisation and robust H∞-control of a P-R system, and the potential effects of abrupt structural changes in the economic fundamentals, as well as the insurer's strategy over a finite time period. Sufficient linear matrix inequality conditions are derived for solving the proposed sub-problems. Finally, a numerical example is presented to illustrate the applicability of the theoretical results.

Keywords

Premium-reserve processH-infinity controlsystem stabilityMarkovian regime switching systemstime-varying delay
Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 747 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © Astin Bulletin 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balzer, L.A. and Benjamin, S. (1980) Dynamic response of insurance systems with delayed profit/loss sharing feedback to isolated unpredicted claims. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 107 (4), 513–528.Google Scholar
Balzer, L.A. and Benjamin, S. (1982) Control of insurance systems with delayed profit/loss sharing feedback and persisting unpredicted claims. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 109 (2), 285–316.Google Scholar
Borch, K. (1967) The theory of risk. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Ser. B), 29, 432–452.Google Scholar
Boukas, E.K. and Liu, Z.K. (2001) Robust H ∞ control of discrete-time Markovian jump linear systems with mode-dependent time-delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 46 (12), 1918–1924.Google Scholar
Bühlmann, H. (1970) Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cao, Y.Y. and Lams, J. (1999) Stochastic stabilizability and H ∞ control for discrete-time jump linear systems with time delay, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 336, 1263–1281.Google Scholar
Chen, A. and Delong, L. (2015) Optimal investment for a defined-contribution pension scheme under a regime switching model. ASTIN Bulletin, 45 (02), 397–419.Google Scholar
De Finetti, B. (1957) Su una impostazione alternativa della theoria collectiva del rischio. In Transactions of the 15th International Congress of Actuaries, vol. II, 433–443.Google Scholar
Fan, K., Shen, Y., Siu, T.K. and Wang, R. (2015) Pricing annuity guarantees under a double regime-switching model. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 62, 62–78.Google Scholar
Fleming, W. and Rishel, R. (1975) Deterministic and Stochastic Optimal Control. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Francis, B. and Khargonekar, P. (1995) Robust Control Theory. USA: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, M. (2013) Pension plan solvency and extreme market movements: A regime switching approach. Abstract of the leeds discussion. British Actuarial Journal, 18 (03), 681–694.Google Scholar
Gu, K., Kharitonov, V.L. and Chen, J. (2003) Stability of Time-Delay Systems. USA: Birkhäuser Publications.Google Scholar
Guidolin, M. (2011) Markov switching models in empirical finance. In Missing Data Methods: Time-Series Methods and Applications (ed. Drukker, D.M.) (Advances in Econometrics, Volume 27, Part 2), pp. 1–86. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J.D. (2014) Macroeconomic Regimes and Regime Shifts. Preprint. Department of Economics, San Diego, United States: University of California.Google Scholar
Hansen, L.P. and Sargent, T.J. (2007) Robustness. United States: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Helton, J.W. and Merino, O. (1998) Classical Control Using H-Infinity Methods: Theory, Optimization, and Design. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X., Cui, L.-A. and Ren, F. (2011) Conditional ruin probability with a Markov regime switching model. Nonlinear Maths for Uncertainty and its Application AISC, 100, 295–300.Google Scholar
Martin-Löf, A. (1983) Premium control in an insurance system, an approach using linear control theory. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1983 (1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Y.S., Park, P., Kwon, W.H. and Lee, Y.S. (2001) Delay-dependent robust stabilization of uncertain state-delayed systems. International Journal of Control, 74 (14), 1447–1455.Google Scholar
Pantelous, A.A. and Papageorgiou, A. (2013) On the robust stability of pricing models for non-life insurance products. European Actuarial Journal, 3 (2), 535–550.Google Scholar
Pantelous, A.A. and Yang, L. (2014) Robust LMI stability, stabilization and H∞ control for premium pricing models with uncertainties into a stochastic discrete-time framework. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 59, 133–143.Google Scholar
Pantelous, A.A. and Yang, L. (2015) Robust H-infinity control for a premium pricing model with a predefined portfolio strategy. ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Part B, 1 (2), 021006.Google Scholar
Rantala, J. (1986) Experience rating of ARIMA processes by the Kalman filter. ASTIN Bulletin, 16 (1), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rantala, J. (1988) Fluctuations in insurance business results: Some control-theoretical aspects. Transactions of the 23rd International Congress of Actuaries, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Rambeerich, N. and Pantelous, A.A. (2016) A high order finite element scheme for pricing options under regime switching jump diffusion processes. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 300, 83–96.Google Scholar
Shen, Y. and Siu, T.K. (2013) Longevity bond pricing under stochastic interest rate and mortality with regime-switching. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 52 (1), 114–123.Google Scholar
Shinners, S.M. (1964) Control System Design. Root Locus Method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Siu, C.C., Yam, S.C.P. and Yang, H. (2015) Valuing equity-linked death benefits in a regime-switching framework. ASTIN Bulletin, 45 (02), 355–395.Google Scholar
Vandebroek, M. and Dhaene, J. (1990) Optimal premium control in a non-life insurance business. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1990 (1–2), 3–13.Google Scholar
Xie, L., Fu, M. and De Souza, C.E. (1992) H ∞ control and quadratic stabilization of systems with parameter uncertainty via output feedback. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 37, 1253–1256.Google Scholar
Xu, S. Lam, J. and Chen, T. (2004) Robust H∞ control for uncertain discrete stochastic time-delay systems. Systems and Control Letters, 51 (3–4), 203–215.Google Scholar
Zimbidis, A.A. and Haberman, S. (2001) The combined effect of delay and feedback on the insurance pricing process: A control theory approach. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 28, 263–280.Google Scholar