Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:39:13.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk Theory with the Gamma Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

François Dufresne ,
Hans U. Gerber  and
Elias S. W. Shiu
François Dufresne*
Affiliation:
Laval University, University of Lausanne and University of Manitoba
Hans U. Gerber*
Affiliation:
Laval University, University of Lausanne and University of Manitoba
Elias S. W. Shiu*
Affiliation:
Laval University, University of Lausanne and University of Manitoba
*
École d'Actuariat, Université Laval, Québec G1K 7P4, Canada.
École des H.E.C., Université de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Department of Actuarial and Management Sciences, Faculty of Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T2N2, Canada.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aggregate claims process is modelled by a process with independent, stationary and nonnegative increments. Such a process is either compound Poisson or else a process with an infinite number of claims in each time interval, for example a gamma process. It is shown how classical risk theory, and in particular ruin theory, can be adapted to this model. A detailed analysis is given for the gamma process, for which tabulated values of the probability of ruin are provided.

Keywords

Aggregate claimscompound Poisson processgamma processinfinite divisibilityrisk theoryruin probabilitysimulationstable distributionsinverse Gaussian distribution
Type
Articles
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , November 1991 , pp. 177 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1991

References

Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A. (1964) Handbook of Mathematical Functions. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. Reprinted by Dover, New York.Google Scholar
Bowers, N.J. Jr., Gerber, H.U., Hickman, J.C., Jones, D.A. and Nesbitt, C.J. (1986) Actuarial Mathematics. Society of Actuaries, Itasca, Illinois.Google Scholar
De Groot, M.H. (1975) Probability and Statistics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Dufresne, F. and Gerber, H.U. (1988) The surplus immediately before and at ruin, and the amount of the claim causing ruin. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 7, 193–199.Google Scholar
Dufresne, F. and Gerber, H.U. (1989) Three methods to calculate the probability of ruin. ASTIN Bulletin 19, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, W. (1971) An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Vol. 2 (2nd edn). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Folks, J. L. and Chhikara, R. S. (1978) The Inverse Gaussian Distribution and Its Statistical Application — A Review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 40, 263–275; Discussion 275-289.Google Scholar
Gendron, M. and Crepeau, H. (1989) On the Computation of the Aggregate Claim Distribution When Individual Claims Are Inverse Gaussian. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 8, 251–258.Google Scholar
Panjer, H.H. and Willmot, G.E. (1984) Models for the distribution of aggregate claims in risk theory. Transactions of the Society of Actuaries 36, 399–477.Google Scholar
Seal, H. L. (1969) The Stochastic Theory of a Risk Business. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Willmot, G. E. (1987) The Poisson-Inverse Gaussian Distribution as an Alternative to the Negative Binomial. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmot, G. E. (1988) Further use of Shiu's approach to the evaluation of ultimate ruin probabilities. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 7, 275–281.Google Scholar
Willmot, G. E. (1990) A Queueing Theoretic Approach to the Analysis of the Claims Payment Process. Transactions of the Society of Actuaries 42.Google Scholar