Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:38:55.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RISK REDISTRIBUTION GAMES WITH DUAL UTILITIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2016

Tim J. Boonen
Tim J. Boonen*
Affiliation:
Amsterdam School of Economics, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, 1018 WB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies optimal risk redistribution between firms, such as institutional investors, banks or insurance companies. We consider the case where every firm uses dual utility (also called a distortion risk measure) to evaluate risk. We characterize optimal risk redistributions via four properties that need to be satisfied jointly. The characterized risk redistribution is unique under three conditions. Whereas we characterize risk redistributions by means of properties, we can also use some results to study competitive equilibria.We characterize uniqueness of the competitive equilibrium in markets with dual utilities. Finally, we identify two conditions that are jointly necessary and sufficient for the case that there exists a trade that is welfare-improving for all firms.

Keywords

Dual utilitymarket gamesrisk sharingcompetitive equilibriano-trade
Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 303 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © Astin Bulletin 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acerbi, C. (2002) Spectral measures of risk: A coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 1505–1518.Google Scholar
Acerbi, C. and Tasche, D. (2002) On the coherence of expected shortfall. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 1487–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. and Heath, D. (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9, 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asimit, A.V., Badescu, A.M. and Tsanakas, A. (2013) Optimal risk transfers in insurance groups. European Actuarial Journal, 3, 159–190.Google Scholar
Aubin, J. (1979) Mathematical Methods of Game and Economic Theory. Amsterdam, North-Holland, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Aubin, J. (1981) Cooperative fuzzy games. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6, 1–13.Google Scholar
Aumann, R. (1964) Markets with a continuum of traders. Econometrica, 32, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. and Shapley, L. (1974) Values of Non-Atomatic Games. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2012) Consultative document: Fundamental review of the trading book. Basel, Switzerland. Available at: http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs219.pdf (last reviewed on November 9th, 2016).Google Scholar
Bergstrom, T.C. and Varian, H.R. (1985) When do market games have transferable utility? Journal of Economic Theory, 35, 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billera, L.J. and Heath, D. (1982) Allocation of shared costs: A set of axioms yielding a unique procedure. Mathematics of Operations Research, 7, 32–39.Google Scholar
Boonen, T.J. (2015) Competitive equilibria with distortion risk measures. ASTIN Bulletin, 45, 703–728.Google Scholar
Boonen, T.J., Tan, K.S. and Zhuang, S.C. (2016) The role of a representative reinsurer in optimal reinsurance. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 70, 196–204.Google Scholar
Borch, K. (1962) Equilibrium in a reinsurance market. Econometrica, 30, 424–444.Google Scholar
Bühlmann, H. and Jewell, W.S. (1979) Optimal risk exchanges. ASTIN Bulletin, 10, 243–262.Google Scholar
Chateauneuf, A., Kast, R. and Lapied, A. (1996) Choquet pricing for financial markets with frictions. Mathematical Finance, 6, 323–330.Google Scholar
Chen, J.M. (2014) Measuring market risk under the Basel accords: VaR, stressed VaR, and expected shortfall. Aestimatio, The IEB International Journal of Finance, 8, 184–201.Google Scholar
Chew, S.H., Karni, E. and Safra, Z. (1987) Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities. Journal of Economic Theory, 42, 370–381.Google Scholar
Chi, Y. (2012) Reinsurance arrangements minimizing the risk-adjusted value of an insurer's liability. ASTIN Bulletin, 42, 529–557.Google Scholar
Chi, Y. and Tan, K.S. (2011) Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CVaR risk measures: A simplified approach. ASTIN Bulletin, 41, 487–509.Google Scholar
Chi, Y. and Weng, C. (2013) Optimal reinsurance subject to Vajda condition. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53, 179–189.Google Scholar
Csóka, P., Herings, P.J.J. and Kóczy, L. (2009) Stable allocations of risk. Games and Economic Behavior, 67, 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csóka, P. and Pintér, M. (2016) On the impossibility of fair risk allocation. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics, 16, 143–158.Google Scholar
Dana, R.-A. and Le Van, C. (2010) Overlapping sets of priors and the existence of efficient allocations and equilibria for risk measures. Mathematical Finance, 20, 327–339.Google Scholar
De Castro, L.I. and Chateauneuf, A. (2011) Ambiguity aversion and trade. Economic Theory, 48, 243–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Giorgi, E. and Post, T. (2008) Second-order stochastic dominance, reward-risk portfolio selection, and the CAPM. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43, 525–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denault, M. (2001) Coherent allocation of risk capital. Journal of Risk, 4, 1–34.Google Scholar
Denneberg, D. (1994) Non-Additive Measure and Integral. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eling, M., Gatzert, N. and Schmeiser, H. (2008) The swiss solvency test and its market implications. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 33, 418–439.Google Scholar
Gerber, H. and Pafumi, G. (1998) Utility functions: From risk theory to finance. North American Actuarial Journal, 2, 74–91.Google Scholar
Gillies, D. (1953) Some Theorems on n-person Games. Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Goovaerts, M.J. and Laeven, R. (2008) Actuarial risk measures for financial derivative pricing. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 42, 540–547.Google Scholar
Jouini, E., Schachermayer, W. and Touzi, N. (2008) Optimal risk sharing for law invariant monetary utility functions. Mathematical Finance, 18, 269–292.Google Scholar
Kalkbrener, M. (2005) An axiomatic approach to capital allocation. Mathematical Finance, 15, 425–437.Google Scholar
Kasuoka, S. (2001) On law invariant coherent risk measures. Advances in Mathematical Economics, 3, 83–95.Google Scholar
Ludkovski, M. and Young, V.R. (2009) Optimal risk sharing under distorted probabilities. Mathematics and Financial Economics, 2, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, J. (1988) The Shapley value in the non differentiable case. International Journal of Game Theory, 17, 1–65.Google Scholar
Mirman, L. and Tauman, I. (1982) Demand compatible equitable cost sharing prices. Mathematics of Operations Research, 7, 40–56.Google Scholar
Myers, S.C. and Read, J.A. (2001) Capital allocation for insurance companies. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 68, 545–580.Google Scholar
Peleg, B. (1989) An axiomatization of the core of market games. Mathematics of Operations Research, 14, 448–456.Google Scholar
Quiggin, J. (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 323–343.Google Scholar
Quiggin, J. (1991) Comparative statics for rank-dependent expected utility theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 339–350.Google Scholar
Quiggin, J. (1992) Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank Dependent Model. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Schmeidler, D. (1969) The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 17, 1163–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, L. (1953) A value for n-person games. In Contributions to the Theory of Games, pp. 307–317. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shapley, L. and Shubik, M. (1969) On market games. Journal of Economic Theory, 1, 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasche, D. (1999) Risk contributions and performance measurement. Preprint, TU Munich.Google Scholar
Tijs, S. (1981) Bounds for the core and the τ-value. In Game Theory and Mathematical Economics, pp. 123–132. Amsterdam, North-Holland, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Tsanakas, A. (2009) To split or not to split: Capital allocation with convex risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44, 268–277.Google Scholar
Tsanakas, A. and Barnett, C. (2003) Risk capital allocation and cooperative pricing of insurance liabilities. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 33, 239–254.Google Scholar
Wang, R. (2016) Regulatory arbitrage of risk measures. Quantitative Finance, 16, 337–347.Google Scholar
Wang, S.S. (1995) Insurance pricing and increased limits ratemaking by proportional hazards transforms. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 17, 43–54.Google Scholar
Wang, S.S. (1996) Premium calculation by transforming the layer premium density. ASTIN Bulletin, 26, 71–92.Google Scholar
Wang, S.S. (2000) A class of distortion operators for pricing financial and insurance risks. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 67, 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S.S., Young, V.R. and Panjer, H.H. (1997) Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 21, 173–183.Google Scholar
Yaari, M.E. (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55, 95–115.Google Scholar
Zhou, R., Li, J.S.-H. and Tan, K.S. (2015) Economic pricing of mortality-linked securities: A tâtonnement approach. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 82, 65–96.Google Scholar