Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:16:06.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Produits financiers et determination de la prime glissante de traites non proportionnels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Charles Levi*
Affiliation:
Compagnie Transcontinentale de Reassurance, Paris, France
*
Compagnie Transcontinentale de Reassurance, 15 rue Louis le Grand, 75002 Paris, France.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Financial income play a big part for the calculation of the minimum premium and maximum premium of a sliding scale for non-proportional treaties. The aggregate loss for the XL is supposed to be a compound Poisson process. It is computed by Panjer's Algorithm. Some numerical results are shown for different values of the claims number and the interest rate.

Type
Workshop
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1988

References

Bibliographie

Benktander, Gunnar (1963), a note on the most dangerous and skewest class of distribution. ASTIN Bulletin 2 (1963) pp. 387390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benktander, Gunnar (1975), the Calculation of a fluctuation loading for an excess of loss cover. ASTIN Bulletin 8 (1975) pp. 272278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemeur, Hugo (1984) practical rating of variable accident excess-loss premiums. In Premium Calculation in Insurance Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
Gerathewolhl, Klauset al. (1980) Reinsurance Principles and Practice Vol 1 p. 319, Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft e.V, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Panjer, Harry H. (1981), recursive evaluation of a family of compound distributions. ASTIN Bulletin 12 (1981) pp. 2226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panjer, Harry H. et Lutek, B. W. (1983) Practical aspects of stop loss calculations. Insurance mathematics and Economics 2 (1983) pp. 159–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar