Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:45:34.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal Reinsurance Revisited – A Geometric Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2013

Ka Chun Cheung
Ka Chun Cheung*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, Tel.: +852-28591987, Fax: +852-28589041, E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we reexamine the two optimal reinsurance problems studied in Cai et al. (2008), in which the objectives are to find the optimal reinsurance contracts that minimize the value-at-risk (VaR) and the conditional tail expectation (CTE) of the total risk exposure under the expectation premium principle. We provide a simpler and more transparent approach to solve these problems by using intuitive geometric arguments. The usefulness of this approach is further demonstrated by solving the VaR-minimization problem when the expectation premium principle is replaced by Wang's premium principle.

Keywords

Value-at-riskconditional tail expectationreinsuranceexpectation premium principlecomonotonicityWang's premium principleincreasing convex function
Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , May 2010 , pp. 221 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, K.J. (1963) Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care. American Economic Review, 53, 941–973.Google Scholar
Balbás, A., Balbás, B. and Heras, A. (2008) Optimal reinsurance with general risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44, 374–384.Google Scholar
Borch, K. (1960) An attempt to determine the optimum amount of stop loss reinsurance. Transactions of the 16th International Congress of Actuaries, 597–610.Google Scholar
Bowers, N.L., Gerber, H.U., Hickman, J.C., Jones, D.A. and Nesbitt, C.J. (1997) Actuarial Mathematics, 2nd edition, Society of Actuaries, Schaumburg, III.Google Scholar
Cai, J. and Tan, K.S. (2007) Optimal retention for a stop-loss reinsurance under the VaR and CTE risk measures. ASTIN Bulletin, 37, 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, J., Tan, K.S., Weng, C. and Zhang, Y. (2008) Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CTE risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 43, 185–196.Google Scholar
Denneberg, D. (1994) Non-Additive Measure and Integral, Kluwer, Academic Publishers, Dor-drecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denuit, M., Dhaene, J., Goovaerts, M.J. and Kaas, R. (2005) Actuarial Theory for Dependent Risks: Measures, Orders and Models, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhaene, J., Vanduffel, S., Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R., Tang, Q. and Vyncke, D. (2006) Risk measures and comonotonicity: a review. Stochastic Models, 22, 573–606.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U. (1979) An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory, S.S. Huebner Foundation for Insurance Education, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Goovaerts, M.J., Van Heerwaarden, A.E. and Kaas, R. (1989) Optimal reinsurance in relation to ordering of risk. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 8, 11–17.Google Scholar
Guerra, M. and Centeno, M.L. (2008) Optimal reinsurance policy: The adjustment coefficient and the expected utility criteria. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 42, 529–539.Google Scholar
Kaluszka, M. (2001) Optimal reinsurance under mean-variance premium principles. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 28, 61–67.Google Scholar
Kaluszka, M. (2004a) An extension of Arrow's resulton optimality of a stop loss contract. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 35, 527–536.Google Scholar
Kaluszka, M. (2004b) Mean-variance optimal reinsurance arrangements. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 28–41.Google Scholar
Kaluszka, M. (2005) Optimal reinsurance under convex principles of premium calculation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 36, 375–398.Google Scholar
Mossin, J. (1968) Aspects of Rational Insurance Purchasing. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 553–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockafellar, R.T. (1970) Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. Google Scholar
Schmitter, H. (2001) Setting optimal reinsurance retentions, Swiss Re Publications, Zürich.Google Scholar
Smith, V.L. (1968) Optimal Insurance Coverage. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 68–77.Google Scholar
Verlaak, R. and Beirlant, J. (2003) Optimal reinsurance programs: an optimal combination of several reinsurance protections on a heterogeneous insurance portfolio. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 33, 381–403.Google Scholar
Wang, S. (1996) Premium calculation by transforming the layer premium density. ASTIN Bulletin, 26, 71–92.Google Scholar
Wang, S., Young, V.R. and Panjer, H.H. (1997) Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 21, 173–183.Google Scholar
Waters, H.R. (1983) Some mathematical aspects of reinsurance. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2, 17–26.Google Scholar
Yaari, M.E. (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55, 95–115.Google Scholar
Young, V.R. (1999) Optimal insurance under Wang's premium principle. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 25, 109–122.Google Scholar