Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:28:34.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NEYMAN-PEARSON PERSPECTIVE ON OPTIMAL REINSURANCE WITH CONSTRAINTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2017

Ambrose Lo
Ambrose Lo*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, The University of Iowa, 241 Schaeffer Hall, Iowa City, IA 52242-1409, USA, Tel.: (319) 335-1915
*
E-Mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The formulation of optimal reinsurance policies that take various practical constraints into account is a problem commonly encountered by practitioners. In the context of a distortion-risk-measure-based optimal reinsurance model without moral hazard, this article introduces and employs a variation of the Neyman–Pearson Lemma in statistical hypothesis testing theory to solve a wide class of constrained optimal reinsurance problems analytically and expeditiously. Such a Neyman–Pearson approach identifies the unit-valued derivative of each ceded loss function as the test function of an appropriate hypothesis test and transforms the problem of designing optimal reinsurance contracts to one that resembles the search of optimal test functions achieved by the classical Neyman–Pearson Lemma. As an illustration of the versatility and superiority of the proposed Neyman–Pearson formulation, we provide complete and transparent solutions of several specific constrained optimal reinsurance problems, many of which were only partially solved in the literature by substantially more difficult means and under extraneous technical assumptions. Examples of such problems include the construction of the optimal reinsurance treaties in the presence of premium budget constraints, counterparty risk constraints and the optimal insurer–reinsurer symbiotic reinsurance treaty considered recently in Cai et al. (2016).

Keywords

Distortion1-LipschitzValue-at-Riskreciprocal reinsurancesigned measure
Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , May 2017 , pp. 467 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © Astin Bulletin 2017 

References

Arrow, K. (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. American Economic Review, 53, 941–973.Google Scholar
Balbás, A., Balbás, B., Balbás, R. and Heras, A. (2015) Optimal reinsurance under risk and uncertainty. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 60, 61–74.Google Scholar
Basak, S. and Shapiro, A. (2001) Value-at-risk-based risk management: Optimal policies and asset prices. Review of Financial Studies, 14, 371–405.Google Scholar
Belles-Sampera, J., Guillen, M. and Santolino, M. (2016) What attitudes to risk underlie distortion risk measure choices? Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 68, 101–109.Google Scholar
Borch, K. (1960) An attempt to determine the optimum amount of stop loss reinsurance. Transactions of the 16th International Congress of Actuaries, 1, 597–610.Google Scholar
Cai, J., Fang, Y., Li, Z. and Willmot, G.E. (2013) Optimal reciprocal reinsurance treaties under the joint survival probability and the joint profitable probability. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 80, 145–168.Google Scholar
Cai, J., Lemieux, C. and Liu, F. (2016) Optimal reinsurance from the perspectives of both an insurer and a reinsurer. ASTIN Bulletin, 46, 815–849.Google Scholar
Cai, J. and Tan, K.S. (2007) Optimal retention for a stop-loss reinsurance under the VaR and CTE risk measure. ASTIN Bulletin, 37, 93–112.Google Scholar
Cai, J., Tan, K.S., Weng, C. and Zhang, Y. (2008) Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CTE risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 43, 185–196.Google Scholar
Cheung, K.C. (2010) Optimal reinsurance revisited - a geometric approach. ASTIN Bulletin, 40, 221–239.Google Scholar
Cheung, K.C., Liu, F. and Yam, S.C.P. (2012) Average Value-at-Risk minimizing reinsurance under Wang's premium principle with constraints. ASTIN Bulletin, 42, 575–600.Google Scholar
Cheung, K.C. and Lo, A. (2017) Characterizations of optimal reinsurance treaties: A cost-benefit approach. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2017, 1–28.Google Scholar
Chi, Y. and Tan, K.S. (2011) Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CVaR risk measures: A simplified approach. ASTIN Bulletin, 41, 487–509.Google Scholar
Cui, W., Yang, J. and Wu, L. (2013) Optimal reinsurance minimizing the distortion risk measure under general reinsurance premium principles. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53, 74–85.Google Scholar
Cummins, J.D. and Mahul, O. (2004) The demand for insurance with an upper limit on coverage. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 71, 253–264.Google Scholar
Dhaene, J., Vanduffel, S., Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R., Tang, Q. and Vyncke, D. (2006) Risk measures and comonotonicity: A review. Stochastic Models, 22, 573–606.Google Scholar
Dowd, K. and Blake, D. (2006) After VaR: The theory, estimation and insurance applications of quantile-based risk measures. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73, 193–229.Google Scholar
Francis, R.L. and Wright, G.P. (1969) Some duality relationships for the generalized neyman-pearson problem. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 4, 394–412.Google Scholar
Lehmann, E.L. and Romano, J.P. (2005) Testing Statistical Hypotheses, 3rd edition. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Lo, A. (2016) A unifying approach to risk-measure-based optimal reinsurance problems with practical constraints. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal (in press), DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2016.1193558.Google Scholar
Lu, Z., Meng, L., Wang, Y. and Shen, Q. (2016) Optimal reinsurance under VaR and TVaR risk measures in the presence of reinsurer's risk limit. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 68, 92–100.Google Scholar
Rao, M.M. (2014) Stochastic Processes – Inference Theory, 2nd edition. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Shao, J. (2003) Mathematical Statistics, 2nd edition. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Tan, K.S., Weng, C. and Zhang, Y. (2011) Optimality of general reinsurance contracts under CTE risk measure. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 49, 175–187.Google Scholar
Wagner, D.H. (1969) Nonlinear functional versions of the Neyman-Pearson Lemma. SIAM Review, 11, 52–65.Google Scholar
Zheng, Y. and Cui, W. (2014) Optimal reinsurance with premium constraint under distortion risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 59, 109–120.Google Scholar
Zhuang, S.C., Weng, C., Tan, K.S. and Assa, H. (2016) Marginal Indemnification Function formulation for optimal reinsurance. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 67, 65–76.Google Scholar