Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:03:32.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NEIGHBOURING PREDICTION FOR MORTALITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2021

Chou-Wen Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Finance National Sun Yat-Sen UniversityKaohsiung, TaiwanRisk and Insurance Research Center College of Commerce, National Chengchi University Taipei, Taiwan E-Mail: [email protected]
Jinggong Zhang
Affiliation:
Nanyang Business School Nanyang Technological UniversitySingapore E-Mail: [email protected]
Wenjun Zhu*
Affiliation:
Nanyang Business School Nanyang Technological UniversitySingapore E-Mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We propose a new neighbouring prediction model for mortality forecasting. For each mortality rate at age x in year t, mx,t, we construct an image of neighbourhood mortality data around mx,t, that is, Ꜫmx,t (x1, x2, s), which includes mortality information for ages in [x-x1, x+x2], lagging k years (1 ≤ ks). Combined with the deep learning model – convolutional neural network, this framework is able to capture the intricate nonlinear structure in the mortality data: the neighbourhood effect, which can go beyond the directions of period, age, and cohort as in classic mortality models. By performing an extensive empirical analysis on all the 41 countries and regions in the Human Mortality Database, we find that the proposed models achieve superior forecasting performance. This framework can be further enhanced to capture the patterns and interactions between multiple populations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Actuarial Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We thank Mario V. Wüthrich (editor) and three anonymous referees for helpful comments. Wang acknowledges the support of MOST (107-2410-H-110-010-MY3). Zhang thanks the research funding support from the Nanyang Technological University Start-up Grant (04INS000509C300) and the Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 Grant (RG55/20). Zhu also thanks the research funding support from the Nanyang Technological University Start-Up Grant (04INS000384C300), Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 (RG143/19), and the Society of Actuaries Education Institution Grant.

References

Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., et al. (2016) Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI’16), pp. 265–283.Google Scholar
Blake, D., Cairns, A., Coughlan, G., Dowd, K. and MacMinn, R. (2013) The new life market. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 80(3), 501558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D., MacMinn, R., Tsai, J.C. and Wang, J. (2018) Longevity risk and capital markets: The 2017-18 update. Pension Institute Discussion Paper PI-1908.Google Scholar
Bottou, L. and Bousquet, O. (2008) The tradeoffs of large scale learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds. M. Jordan, Y. LeCun and S. Solla), pp. 161–168.Google Scholar
Cairns, A.J., Blake, D. and Dowd, K. (2006) A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty: Theory and calibration. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73(4), 687718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, A.J., Blake, D., Dowd, K., Coughlan, G.D., Epstein, D., Ong, A. and Balevich, I. (2009) A quantitative comparison of stochastic mortality models using data from England and Wales and the United States. North American Actuarial Journal, 13(1), 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H., MacMinn, R. and Sun, T. (2015) Multi-population mortality model: A factor copula approach. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 63, 135146.Google Scholar
Chollet, F. et al. (2018) Keras: The Python deep learning library. Astrophysics Source Code Library.Google Scholar
Dietterich, T.G. (2000) Ensemble methods in machine learning. International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems, pp. 115. Springer.Google Scholar
Dong, Y., Huang, F., Yu, H. and Haberman, S. (forthcoming) Multi-population mortality forecasting using tensor decomposition. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, pp. 334–356.Google Scholar
Dowd, K., Cairns, A.J.G., Blake, D., Coughlan, G.D. and Khalaf-Allah, M. (2011) A gravity model of mortality rates for two related populations. North American Actuarial Journal, 15(2), 334356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainaut, D. (2018) A neural-network analyzer for mortality forecast. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 48(2), 481508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J. and Franklin, J. (2005) The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference and prediction. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 27(2), 8385.Google Scholar
Jarner, S.F. and Kryger, E.M. (2011) Modelling adult mortality in small populations: The SAINT model. ASTIN Bulletin, 41(2), 377418.Google Scholar
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. and Hinton, G.E. (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1097–1105.Google Scholar
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. and Hinton, G. (2015) Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y. and Haffner, P. (1998) Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11), 22782324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, R.D. and Carter, L.R. (1992) Modeling and forecasting US mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(419), 659671.Google Scholar
Li, J.S.-H., Chan, W.-S. and Zhou, R. (2017) Semicoherent multipopulation mortality modeling: The impact on longevity risk securitization. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 84(3), 10251065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, N. and Lee, R. (2005) Coherent mortality forecasts for a group of population: An extension to the classical Lee-Carter approach. Demography, 42(3), 575594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perla, F., Richman, R., Scognamiglio, S. and Wuthrich, M.V. (2021) Time-series forecasting of mortality rates using deep learning. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Renshaw, A.E. and Haberman, S. (2006) A cohort-based extension to the Lee–Carter model for mortality reduction factors. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38(3), 556570.Google Scholar
Richman, R. (2018) AI in actuarial science. Available at SSRN 3218082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richman, R. and Wüthrich, M.V. (forthcoming) A neural network extension of the Lee–Carter model to multiple populations. Annals of Actuarial Science, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Wang, C.-W., Yang, S.S. and Huang, H.-C. (2015) Modeling multi-country mortality dependence and its application in pricing survivor index swaps—a dynamic copula approach. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 63, 3039.Google Scholar
Wang, H.-C., Yue, C.-S.J. and Chong, C.-T. (2018) Mortality models and longevity risk for small populations. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 78, 351359.Google Scholar
Zhou, R., Li, J.S.-H. and Tan, K.S. (2013) Pricing standardized mortality securitizations: A two-population model with transitory jump effects. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 80(3), 733774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y.-T. and Chellappa, R. (1988) Computation of optical flow using a neural network. IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 1998, pp. 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, W., Tan, K.S. and Wang, C.-W. (2017) Modeling multicountry longevity risk with mortality dependence: A Lévy subordinated hierarchical Archimedean copulas approach. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 84(S1), 477493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Wang et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Wang et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 927.6 KB