Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:41:13.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mathematical Models in Insurance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Karl Borch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper contains little which can be considered as new. It gives a survey of results which have been presented over the last 10-15 years. At one time these results seemed very promising, but in retrospect it is doubtful if they have fulfilled the expectations they raised. In this situation it may be useful to retrace one's steps and see if problems can be reformulated or if new approaches can be found.

Mathematical models have been used in insurance for a long time. One of the first was the Gompertz mortality law; a more recent model, which has been intensively studied is the Compound Poisson Distribution in Lundberg's risk theory.

When a model is introduced, one usually proceeds by stages. The first step is to see if the model appears acceptable on a priori reasons. If it does, the second step is to examine the implications of the model, to see if any of these are in obvious contradiction with observations. If the result of this examination is satisfactory, the third step is usually a statistical analysis to find out how well the model approximates the situation in real life, which one wants to analyse. If the model passes this second examination, the next and final step may be to estimate the parameters of the model, and use it in practice, i.e. to make decisions in the real world.

The advantage of working with a model is that it gives an overall purpose to the collection and analysis of data. A good model should tell us which data we need, and why.

Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , March 1974 , pp. 192 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1974

References

[1]Borch, K.: “The Safety Loading of Reinsurance Premiums”, Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift, 1960, pp 163–184.Google Scholar
[2]Borch, K.: “General Equilibrium in the Economics of Uncertainty” in Borch, & Mossin, (Eds) Risk and Uncertainty, MacMillan, London 1968, pp 247–264.Google Scholar
[3]Borch, K.: “The Rescue of an Insurance Company after Ruin”, The ASTIN Bulletin, Vol V (1969), pp 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Burmeister, E. and Dobell, A. R.: Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth, Collier-MacMillan, London 1970.Google Scholar
[5]Finetti, B. de: “Su una impostazione alternativa della teoria collettiva del rischio”, Transactions of the XV International Congress of Actuaries, 1957 Vol II, pp 433–443.Google Scholar
[6]Gerber, H. U.: “Entscheidungskriterien für den zusammengesetzten Poisson-Process”, Bulletin de l'Association des Actuaires suisses, 1969, 1969, pp 1–47.Google Scholar
[7]Hakansson, N.: “Optimal Investment and Consumption Strategies under Risk for a Class of Utility Functions”, Econometrica, 1970, pp 587–607.Google Scholar
[8]Morill, J.: “One-Person Games of Economic Survival”, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 1966, pp 49–69.Google Scholar