Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:51:42.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Financial Data Analysis with Two Symmetric Distributions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Werner Hürlimann
Werner Hürlimann*
Affiliation:
Value and Risk Management, Winterthur Life and Pensions, Postfach 300, CH-8401 Winterthur
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The normal inverted gamma mixture or generalized Student t and the symmetric double Weibull, as well as their logarithmic counterparts, are proposed for modeling some loss distributions in non-life insurance and daily index return distributions in financial markets. For three specific data sets, the overall goodness-offit from these models, as measured simultaneously by the negative log-likelihood, chi-square and minimum distance statistics, is found to be superior to that of various “good” competitive models including the log-normal, the Burr, and the symmetric α-stable distribution. Furthermore, the study justifies on a statistical basis different important models of financial returns like the model of Black-Scholes (1973), the log-Laplace model of Hürlimann (1995), the normal mixture by Praetz (1972), the symmetric α-stable model by Mandelbrot (1963) and Fama (1965), and the recent double Weibull as limiting geometric-multiplication stable scheme in Mittnik and Rachev (1993). As an application, the prediction of one-year index returns from daily index returns is discussed.

Keywords

Claim size datafinancial market dataindex returnnormal inverted gamma mixturegeneralized Student tsymmetric double Weibullgoodness-offit
Type
Workshop
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , May 2001 , pp. 187 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 2001

References

REFERENCES

Beard, R.E., Pentikäinen, T. and Pesonen, E. (1984) Risk Theory. Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benktander, G. (1970) Schadenverteilung nach Grösse in der Nicht-Lebensversicherung. Bulletin of the Swiss Association of Actuaries, 263–84.Google Scholar
Benktander, G. and Segerdahl, C.-O. (1960) On the analytical representation of claim distribution with special reference to excess of loss reinsurance. Transactions of the International Congress of Actuaries, 626–46.Google Scholar
Bergström, H. (1952) On some expansions of stable distribution functions. Arkiv för Matematik 2, 375–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81, 637–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattberg, R.C. and Gonedes, N.J. (1974) A comparison of the stable and Student distributions as statistical models for stock prices. Journal of Business 47, 244–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriere, J. (1992) Limited expected value comparison tests. Statistics and Probability Letters 15, 321–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramér, H. (1946) Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Efron, B. (1982) Transformation theory: how normal is a family of distributions? (The 1981 Wald Memorial Lecture). The Annals of Statistics 10, 323–339.Google Scholar
Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C. and Mikosch, Th. (1997) Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance. Applications of Mathematics – Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability, vol. 33. Springer.Google Scholar
Fama, E. (1963) Mandelbrot and the stable Paretian hypothesis. J. of Business 36, 420–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. (1965) The behavior of stock market prices. Journal of Business 38, 34–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. and Roll, R. (1968) Some properties of symmetric stable distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63, 817–36.Google Scholar
Fama, E. and Roll, R. (1971) Parameter estimates for symmetric stable distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66, 331–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisz, M. (1973) Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und Mathematische Statistik. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.-U. (1979) An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory. Hübner Foundation. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Heilmann, W.-R. (1989) Decision theoretic foundations of credibility theory. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 8, 77–95.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. and Klugman, S. (1984) Loss Distributions. John Wiley. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hürlimann, W. (1993) Solvabilité et réassurance. Bulletin of the Swiss Association of Actuaries, 229–49.Google Scholar
Hürlimann, W. (1995a) Predictive stop-loss premiums and Student's t-distribution. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 16, 151–59.Google Scholar
Hürlimann, W. (1995b) Is there a rational evidence for an infinite variance asset pricing model? Proceedings of the 5th International AFIR Colloquium.Google Scholar
Hürlimann, W. (1997) Fonctions extrémales et gain financier. Elemente der Mathematik 52, 152–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hürlimann, W. (1998a) On the characterization of maximum likelihood estimators for location-scale families. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 27(2), 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hürlimann, W. (1998b) Extremal Moment Methods and Stochastic Orders. Application in Actuarial Science. Monograph manuscript (available from the author).Google Scholar
Hürlimann, W. (2000) Higher-degree stop-loss transforms and stochastic orders (I) Theory. Blätter der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Versicherungsmathematik XXIV(3), 449–63.Google Scholar
Johnson, N.L., Kotz, A. and Balakrishnan, N. (1995) Continuous Univariate Distributions. (2nd ed.). John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Klugman, S., Panjer, H. and Willmot, G. (1998) Loss Models. From Data to Decisions. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Kon, S.J. (1984) Models of stock returns – a comparison. Journal of Finance 39, 147–65.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. (1963) The variation of certain speculative prices. Journal of Business 36, 394–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittnik, S. and Rachev, S.T. (1993) Modeling asset returns with alternative stable distributions. Econometric Reviews 12(3), 261–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. (1978) Chi-square tests. In Hogg, R. (Ed.). Studies in Statistics, vol. 19. Mathematical Association of America, 453–63.Google Scholar
Moore, D. (1986) Tests of chi-squared type. In D'Agostino, R. and Stephens, M. (Eds.). Goodness-of-Fit Techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York, 63–95.Google Scholar
Müller, A. (1996) Ordering of risks: a comparative study via stop-loss transforms. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 17, 215–22.Google Scholar
Peters, E. (1994) Fractal Market Analysis. Wiley Finance Editions.Google Scholar
Praetz, P.D. (1972) The distribution of share price changes. Journal of Business 45, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, G. (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6, 461–64.Google Scholar
Tages-Anzeiger, (1999) CSFB: Günstiger Ausblick auf 2000. 10 6, 1999, p. 43.Google Scholar
Taylor, S.J. (1992) Modeling Financial Time Series (3rd reprint). John Wiley.Google Scholar