Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:42:49.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Favorable Estimators for Fitting Pareto Models: A Study Using Goodness-of-fit Measures with Actual Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2015

Vytaras Brazauskas  and
Robert Serfling
Vytaras Brazauskas
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Robert Serfling
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083-0688, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Several recent papers treated robust and efficient estimation of tail index parameters for (equivalent) Pareto and truncated exponential models, for large and small samples. New robust estimators of “generalized median” (GM) and “trimmed mean” (T) type were introduced and shown to provide more favorable trade-offs between efficiency and robustness than several well-established estimators, including those corresponding to methods of maximum likelihood, quantiles, and percentile matching. Here we investigate performance of the above mentioned estimators on real data and establish — via the use of goodness-of-fit measures — that favorable theoretical properties of the GM and T type estimators translate into an excellent practical performance. Further, we arrive at guidelines for Pareto model diagnostics, testing, and selection of particular robust estimators in practice. Model fits provided by the estimators are ranked and compared on the basis of Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramér-von Mises, and Anderson-Darling statistics.

Type
Workshop
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , November 2003 , pp. 365 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © ASTIN Bulletin 2003

Footnotes

1

Supported by a grant from the Actuarial Education and Research Fund.

2

Supported by grants from the Casualty Actuarial Society and Society of Actuaries, with administrative support from the Actuarial Education and Research Fund, and by NSF Grant DMS-0103698.

References

Arnold, B.C. (1983). Pareto Distributions. International Cooperative Publishing House. Fairland, Maryland.Google Scholar
Beirlant, J., Teugels, J.L. and Vynckier, P. (1996) Practical Analysis of Extreme Values. Leuven University Press, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
Brazauskas, V. and Serfling, R. (2000a) Robust and efficient estimation of the tail index of a single-parameter Pareto distribution. North American Actuarial Journal 4(4), 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazauskas, V. and Serfling, R. (2000b) Robust estimation of tail parameters for two-parameter Pareto and exponential models via generalized quantile statistics. Extremes 3(3), 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazauskas, V. and Serfling, R. (2001) Small sample performance of robust estimators of tail parameters for Pareto and exponential models. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 70(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Agostino, R.B. and Stephens, M.A. (1986) Goodness-of-Fit Techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
Derrig, R.A., Ostaszewski, K.M. and Rempala, G.A. (2000) Applications of resampling methods in actuarial practice. Proceedings ofthe Casualty Actuarial Society LXXXVII, 322–364.Google Scholar
Durbin, J. (1975) Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests when parameters are estimated with applications to tests of exponentiality and tests on spacings. Biometrika 62, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, R.V. and Klugman, S.A. (1984). Loss Distributions. Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimber, A.C. (1983a) Trimming in gamma samples. Applied Statistics 32, 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimber, A.C. (1983b) Comparison of some robust estimators of scale in gamma samples with known shape. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 18, 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klugman, S.A., Panjer, H.H. and Willmot, G.E. (1998) Loss Models: From Data to Decisions. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Koutrouvelis, I.A. (1981) Large-sample quantile estimation in Pareto laws. Communications in Statistics, Part A – Theory and Methods 10, 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrik, G. (1980) Estimating casualty insurance loss amount distributions. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society LXVII, 57–109.Google Scholar
Philbrick, S.W. (1985) A practical guide to the single parameter Pareto distribution. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society LXXII, 44–84.Google Scholar
Philbrick, S.W. and Jurschak, J. (1981) Discussion of “Estimating casualty insurance loss amount distributions.” Proceedings ofthe Casualty Actuarial Society LXVIII, 101–106.Google Scholar
Quandt, R.E. (1966) Old and new methods of estimation and the Pareto distribution. Metrika 10, 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichle, K.A. and Yonkunas, J.P. (1985) Discussion of “A practical guide to the single parameter Pareto distribution.” Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society LXXII, 85–123.Google Scholar
Rytgaard, M. (1990) Estimation in the Pareto distribution. ASTIN Bulletin 20(2), 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serfling, R. (1984) Generalized L-, M- and R-statistics. Annals of Statistics 12, 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serfling, R. (2000) “Robust and nonparametric estimation via generalized L-statistics: theory, applications, and perspectives,” In: Advances in Methodological and Applied Aspects of Probability and Statistics, Balakrishnan, N. (Ed.), pp. 197–217. Gordon & Breach.Google Scholar