Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T13:21:13.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expected Utility Strategic Decision Models for General Insurers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Danny Samson
Danny Samson*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
*
Graduate School of Management, University of Melbourne, 3052 Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It has been argued in previous studies that the expected utility decision criterion provides useful insights for certain insurance problems, such as underwriting, reinsurance and portfolio optimization problems. In this study three new models are developed which extend and generalize previous results. The first model analyses modified stop-loss reinsurance. The second model analyses risk pooling where both inward and outward reinsurance occur. Expected utility calculations can be used to provide insight on the attractiveness of competing reinsurance and risk pooling options. The third model is for strategic planning, where risk/reward tradeoffs for all the insurer's business activities (underwriting, investment, reinsurance) can be considered in aggregate. The simpler models can often be solved analytically however the strategic planning model is relatively complex and uses Monte Carlo techniques to determine retained earnings distributions. The expected utility approach has been found to be powerful, flexible and comprehensive as a decision aiding mechanism. From a normative viewpoint, this approach accounts very well for all the important decision elements. Recent developments in decision support systems will allow these models to be made available to practitioners in user friendly forms.

Type
Astin Competition 1985: Prize-Winning Papers and Other Selected Papers
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 16 , Issue S1 , April 1986 , pp. S45 - S58
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1986

References

Borch, K. (1974) The Mathematical Theory of Insurance. Lexington Books: Lexington, Mass.Google Scholar
Buhlmann, H. (1971) Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory. Springer-Verlag: London.Google Scholar
Carter, R. (1979) Reinsurance. Kluwer: London.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. D. and Nye, D. J. (1981) Portfolio Optimization Models for Property Liability Insurance Companies: An Analysis and Some Extensions. Management Science 27 (4), 414–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, P. H. (1984) Utility Assessment Methods. Management Science 30 (11), 1283–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freifelder, L. (1979) Exponential Utility Theory Ratemaking: An Alternative Ratemaking Approach. Journal of Risk and Insurance 46 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, D. B. and Thomas, H. (1983) Risk Analysis and Its Applications. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. V. and Klugman, S. A. (1984) Loss Distributions. John Wiley: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, R. L. (1982) Decision Analysis: An Overview. Operations Research 30 (5), 803–838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, A. D. (1953) Safety First and the Holding of Assets. Econometrica 431–449.Google Scholar
Samson, D. A. and Thomas, H. (1983) Reinsurance Decision Making and Expected Utility. Journal of Risk and Insurance 50 (2), 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samson, D. A. and Thomas, H. (1985) Decision Analysis Models in Reinsurance. European Journal of Operational Research 19 (2), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samson, D. A. (1984) Utility Function Assessment using Unrelated Gambles. Working Paper, University of Illinois.Google Scholar