Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:45:41.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bonus-malus Systems with Varying Deductibles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2015

Sandra Pitrebois ,
Jean-François Walhin  and
Michel Denuit
Sandra Pitrebois
Affiliation:
Secura Belgian Re, Avenue des Nerviens, 9-31 boîte 6, B-1040 Bruxelles, Belgium
Jean-François Walhin
Affiliation:
Secura Belgian Re, Avenue des Nerviens, 9-31 boîte 6, B-1040 Bruxelles, Belgium
Michel Denuit
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences Actuarielles, Université Catholique de Louvain, Rue des Wallons, 6 B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Bonus-malus systems typically lead to high maluses when claims at fault are reported. Such penalties are often difficult to implement in practice. It is shown in this paper that this drawback may be avoided by combining a posteriori premium corrections with a deductible varying according to the level occupied in the scale.

Keywords

Bonus-Malus systemdifferentiated bonus scale deductiblesMarkov chains
Type
Workshop
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , May 2005 , pp. 261 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © ASTIN Bulletin 2005

References

Holtan, J. (1994) Bonus made easy. ASTIN Bulletin, 24, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaire, J. (1977) La soif du bonus. ASTIN Bulletin, 9, 181–190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaire, J. (1995) Bonus-Malus Systems in Automobile Insurance. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaire, J. and Hongmin, Z. (1994a) High deductibles instead of Bonus-Malus. Can it work? ASTIN Bulletin, 24, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaire, J. and Hongmin, Z. (1994b) A comparative analysis of 30 Bonus-Malus systems. ASTIN Bulletin, 24, 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norberg, R. (1976) A credibility theory for automobile bonus system. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitrebois, S., Denuit, M., and Walhin, J.-F. (2003a) Fitting the Belgian Bonus-Malus system. Belgian Actuarial Bulletin, 3, 58–62.Google Scholar
Pitrebois, S., Denuit, M. and Walhin, J.-F. (2003b) Setting a BMS in the presence of other rating factors: Taylor’s work revisited. ASTIN Bulletin, 33, 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolski, T., Schmidli, H., Schmidt, V. and Teugels, J. (1999). Stochastic Processes for Insurance and Finance. John Wiley & Sons, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. (1997). Setting a Bonus-Malus scale in the presence of other rating factors. ASTIN Bulletin, 27, 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walhin, J.-F. and Paris, J. (2000) The true claim amount and frequency distributions within a bonus-malus system, ASTIN Bulletin, 30, 391–403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walhin, J.-F. and Paris, J. (2001) The practical replacement of a bonus-malus system, ASTIN Bulletin, 31, 317–335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar