Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:27:31.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bonus Made Easy1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Jon Holtan
Jon Holtan*
Affiliation:
University of Oslo& Samvirke Insurance Company Ltd.
*
Samvirke Insurance Company Ltd., P.O. Box 778 Sentrum, N-0106 Oslo, Norway.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The paper introduces an alternative approach to the traditional experience rating theory in automobile insurance. The approach is based on a simple theory of how high deductibles financed by loans maintain the risk differentiation in an automobile insurance arrangement. Thus the approach differs totally from the usual bonus-malus classes as well as from the credibility based experience rating ideas. The paper is of a theoretical nature and leads up to a mathematical description of how the approach may be optimalized within the framework of a risk model.

Keywords

Bonus-malus systemsoptimal deductibles financed by loans
Type
Workshop
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , May 1994 , pp. 61 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1994

Footnotes

1

An earlier version of this work has been presented at the ASTIN Colloquium, Stockholm 1991.

References

REFERENCES

Bühlmann, H. (1970) Mathematical methods in risk theory. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U. (1990) Life Insurance Mathematics. Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, J. (1963) A theorem on compound Poisson processes with time-dependent change variables. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidsskrift 46, 95–130.Google Scholar
Lemaire, J. (1985) Automobile Insurance: Actuarial Models. Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaire, J. (1991) Negative binomial or Poisson-Inverse Gaussian?Paper presented at the ASTIN Colloquium in Stockholm 1991.Google Scholar
Norberg, R. (1975) Credibility Premium Plans which Make Allowance for Bonus Hunger. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundt, B. (1989) Bonus hunger and Credibility estimators with geometric weights. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 8, 119–126.Google Scholar