Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:46:38.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recursive Formulas for Compound Phase Distributions – Univariate and Bivariate Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2013

Jiandong Ren*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1150 Richmond Street North, Western Science Centre, Room 262, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada. Tel: 001-(519) 661-2111 Ext. 88209, Fax: (519) 661-3813, E-Mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We first present a simple matrix-based recursive formula for calculating the distribution function of compound phase-type random variables. Then we extend the results to the case when the number of claims follows a bivariate matrix negative binomial (BMNB) distribution detailed herein. Further, extending the results in Hipp (2006), we provide speedy recursive formulas for both the univariate and the bivariate models when the claim sizes follow discrete phase-type distributions. Numerical examples are provided.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asmussen, S. (2000) Ruin Probabilities. World Scientific, Singapore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisele, K.T. (2006) Recursions for compound phase distributions. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38, 149156.Google Scholar
Eisele, K.T. (2008) Recursions for multivariate compound phase distributions. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 42, 6572.Google Scholar
Embrechts, P. and Frei, M. (2009) Panjer recursion versus FFT for compound distributions. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 69, 497508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselager, O. (1994) A recursive procedure for calculation of some compound distributions. Astin Bulletin, 24, 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselager, O. (1996) Recursions for certain bivariate counting distributions and their compound distributions. Astin Bulletin, 26, 3552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hipp, C. (2006) Speedy convolution algorithms and Panjer recursions for phase-type distributions. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38, 176188.Google Scholar
Klugman, S.A., Panjer, H.H., and Willmot, G.E. (2008) Loss Models: From Data to Decisions. Wiley, New Jersey, 3rd edn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocherlakota, S. and Kocherlakota, K. (1992) Bivariate Discrete Distributions. Dekker.Google Scholar
Latouche, G. and Ramaswami, V. (1999) Introduction to Matrix Analytic Methods in Stochastic Modeling. SIAM, Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuts, M.F. (1981) Matrix-Geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models: An Algorithmic Approach. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
Panjer, H. (1981) Recursive evaluation of a family of compound distributions. Astin Bulletin, 12, 2226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundt, B. (1992) On some extensions of Panjer's class of counting distributions. Astin Bulletin, 22, 6180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundt, B. (1999) On multivariate Panjer recursions. Astin Bulletin, 29, 2945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundt, B. and Vernic, R. (2009) Recursions for Convolutions and Compound Distributions with Insurance Applications. Springer Verlag: Berlin-Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Thorin, O. and Wikstad, N. (1973) Numerical evaluation of ruin probabilities. Astin Bulletin, 7, 137153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernic, R. (1999) Recursive evaluation of some bivariate compound distributions. Astin Bulletin, 29, 315325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmot, G. (1993) On recursive evaluation of mixed Poisson probabilities and related quantities. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, pp. 114133.Google Scholar
Wu, X. and Li, S. (2010) Recursive evaluation of compound phase-type distributions. Astin Bulletin, 40, 351368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar