Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T17:53:31.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Legal Education in China: Reforms and Requirements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2016

Weidong JI*
Affiliation:
KoGuan Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

This article argues that two types of pressure, specifically pressure from international competition and pressure resulting from the low employment rate of law graduates, are the major motivations for the new wave of legal education reforms in China. The direction of the reforms is from a single model into more diversified models. However, there is tension between “the universities’ pursuit of academic freedom and featured education” and “the government’s focal investment associated with deliberation and calculation.” In recent years, Chinese legal education reform has placed more and more emphasis on practical skills training, and Chinese law schools are now required to open legal practice courses that must make up no less than 15% of the curricula. The author thinks this developmental trend is correct, but points to a potential problem: the costs of practical skills training, historically borne by mostly courts, procuratorates, and law firms, are now being transferred to law schools. Therefore, reform of the legal education sector in China should be adopted together with reforms in the tuition and fees system, as well as the bar exam, so that planned changes can be applied outside of the academic sector.

Type
Legal Education in East Asia
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and KoGuan Law School, Shanghai Jiao Tong University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Chair Professor and Dean of the KoGuan Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. I would like to thank Dr Fei Xiuyan for the draft of translation and Dr Zhang Zheng for valuable help. Correspondence to Weidong Ji, KoGuan Law School, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1954 Huashan Road, Shanghai 200030, China. E-mail address: [email protected].

References

“Breakthrough in the Death Place—the Report of Employment for Law School Graduate in 2009” (2009) Issues of the Rule of Law [Fang Yuan Fa Zhi], 23 June, 3–9.Google Scholar
Feng, Yujun (2013) “On the Experience and Reference from the Reform of Foreign Legal Education.” China University Teaching [Zhong Guo Da Xue Jiao Xue] 692696.Google Scholar
He, Meihuan (2006) “The Ideal Legal Education.” 3 Tsinghua Law Review [Qing Hua Fa Xue] 110140.Google Scholar
Ji, Weidong (2015) “The Ideal and Path of Legal Education Reform in China,” in C. Gane & R.H. Huang, eds., Legal Education in the Global Context: Opportunities and Challenges, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 269274.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education and the Central Political and Legal Committee of the CCP (2011) “Several Opinions Regarding the Implementation of the Education and Cultivation Plan for Eminent Legal Talents,” Jiao Gao 10, Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, online <http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s3875/201204/134451.html> (last accessed 7 May 2016).+(last+accessed+7+May+2016).>Google Scholar
National Education Commission, the National Planning Commission and the Ministry of Finance (1996) “The Interim Method for Tuition and Fee Management of the Colleges,” Jiao Cai 101, Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, online <http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_621/201001/81884.html> (last accessed 7 May 2016).+(last+accessed+7+May+2016).>Google Scholar
Sebert, John A. (2002) “The Cost and Financing of Legal Education.” 52 Journal of Legal Education 516527.Google Scholar
“Shanghai: The Pioneer of the Staff Number Reform” (2015) Democracy and Legal Institution [Min Zhu yu Fa Zhi] 31, 15–18.Google Scholar