Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:17:01.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Book Discussion: Response to Comments by Anna High

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2022

Anna High
Anna High*
Affiliation:
University of Otago, Otago
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Discussion
Information
Asian Journal of Law and Society , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , October 2022 , pp. 526 - 530
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Asian Journal of Law and Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, Kirsten (2019) “The ‘Problem’ of Undesigned Relationality: Ethnographic Fieldwork, Dual Roles and Research Ethics.” 20 Ethnography 8–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielo, James S. (2015) Anthropology of Religion: The Basics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gay y Blasco, Paloma, & Liria de la Cruz Hernández (2012) “Friendship, Anthropology.” 37 Anthropology and Humanism 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greitens, Sheena Chestnut, & Truex, Rory (2020) “Repressive Experiences among China Scholars: New Evidence from Survey Data.” 242 The China Quarterly 349–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
High, Anna (2020) Non-Governmental Orphan Relief in China: Law, Policy, and Practice, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kay Ann (2016) China’s Hidden Children, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Shani M. (2009) “Challenging MonoHumanism: An Argument for Changing the Way We Think About Intercountry Adoption.” 30 Michigan Journal of International Law 413–70.Google Scholar
Kloeden, Anna Jane (2014) “Pondering the Politicization of Intercountry Adoption: Russia’s Ban on American ‘Forever Families’.” 22 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 497–560.Google Scholar
Liang, Xiaochen (2020) “Orphan Relief in China—Anna High, Non-Governmental Orphan Relief in China: Law, Policy, and Practice (New York: Routledge, 2020) pp 174. Hardcover: $53.99.” 7 Asian Journal of Law and Society 583–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Young Sun (2019) “Non-Governmental Orphan Relief in China (By Anna High, Routledge, 2020).” 16 Otago Law Review 241–6.Google Scholar
Qian, Linliang (2014) “Consuming ‘the Unfortunate’: The Violence of Philanthropy in a Contemporary Chinese State-Run Orphanage.” 38 Dialectical Anthropology 247–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Bob (2011) “Ethical Moments: Future Directions for Ethical Review and Ethnography.” 17 Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 377–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triseliotis, John (1993) “Inter-Country Adoption: In Whose Best Interest?,” in Humphrey, M. & Humphrey, H., eds., Inter-Country Adoption: Practical Experiences, London: Routledge, 119–37.Google Scholar
Wang, Leslie K. (2016) Outsourced Children: Orphanage Care and Adoption in Globalizing China, Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar