Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:25:40.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blood Curse and Belonging in Thailand: Law, Buddhism, and Legal Consciousness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2016

David M. ENGEL
David M. ENGEL*
Affiliation:
SUNY Buffalo Law School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article takes up Talal Asad’s suggestion that studies of law and religion should reject the modern/non-modern binary and instead consider the “fragmented cultures” and “hybrid selves” associated with constantly changing social circumstances. The article begins with a seemingly bizarre incident that occurred during Thai street protests in March 2010. Tens of thousands of rural demonstrators splashed their own blood on Bangkok’s public buildings to curse the ruling government and its legal and political institutions. An explanation of the demonstrators’ controversial actions is found in their reaction against efforts of the central Thai ruling elite over the past century to modernize Thai law, rationalize its religious administration, and eliminate rival systems in outlying regions. These efforts, in turn, are placed in the context of a centuries-old tradition of law, kingship, and religious purification through which Thai rulers centralized their power and demonstrated their legitimacy. The street protests in 2010 represented a failed attempt by rural workers simultaneously to claim their place in the Thai nation and to challenge its hegemony, to assert their rights under modern law, and to invoke pre-modern legal norms and identities.

Keywords

BuddhismThailandlawreligionblood cursemodernismred shirts
Type
Buddhism and Law
Information
Asian Journal of Law and Society , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , May 2016 , pp. 71 - 83
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and KoGuan Law School, Shanghai Jiao Tong University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

SUNY Distinguished Service Professor at the SUNY Buffalo Law School. Correspondence to David M. Engel, SUNY Buffalo Law School, Buffalo, NY 14260, US. E-mail address: [email protected].

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, Saowanee T., & McCargo, Duncan (2014) “Diglossia and Identity in Northeast Thailand: Linguistic, Social, and Political Hierarchy.” 18 Journal of Sociolinguistics 60–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, Talal (2003) Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bangkok Post (2015) “Myanmar Buddhist Radicalism Fuels Thai Push for State Religion,” 4 November, online <http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/general/754452/myanmar-buddhist-radicalism-fuels-thai-push-for-state-religion> (last accessed 21 December 2015).+(last+accessed+21+December+2015).>Google Scholar
Cohen, Erik (2012) “Contesting Discourses of Blood in the ‘Red Shirts’ Protests in Bangkok.” 43 Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 216–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, David M. (2011) ‘“The Spirits Were Always Watching’: Buddhism, Secular Law, and Social Change in Thailand,” in Sullivan, et al., eds., After Secular Law, Stanford: Stanford Law Books, 242–260.Google Scholar
Engel, David M., & Engel, Jaruwan S. (2010) Tort, Custom, and Karma: Globalization and Legal Consciousness in Thailand, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter (1992) The Mythology of Modern Law, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1983) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Harding, Andrew, & Leyland, Peter (2011) The Constitutional System of Thailand: A Contextual Analysis, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Jory, Patrick (2002) “The Vessantara Jataka, Barami, and the Bodhisatta-Kings: The Origin and Spread of a Thai Concept of Power.” 16 Crossroads 36–78.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. (1977) The Golden Peninsula: Culture and Adaptation in Mainland Southeast Asia, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Morris, Rosalind C. (2000) In the Place of Origins: Modernity and Its Mediums in Northern Thailand, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Panikkar, Raimundo (1982) “Is the Notion of Human Rights a Western Concept?” 120 Diogenes 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajah, Ananda (2005) “Political Assassination by Other Means: Public Protest, Sorcery and Morality in Thailand.” 36 Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramitanon, Shalardchai (2002) Phi jao nai [Spirits of the Nobility], 2nd edn, Chiangmai: Ming Müang Press.Google Scholar
Streckfuss, David (2011) Truth on Trial in Thailand: Defamation, Treason, and Lèse-Majesté, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers, Yelle, Robert A.& Taussig-Rubbo, Mateo, eds. (2011) After Secular Law, Stanford: Stanford Law Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tambiah, S.J. (1976) World Conqueror and World Renouncer: A Study of Buddhism and Polity in Thailand Against A Historical Background, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuktanan, Salisa (2012) “Ritualizing Identity-Based Political Movement: Challenging Thailand’s Political Legitimacy through Blood-Sacrificing Rituals.” 2 Michigan Journal of Asian Studies 89–110.Google Scholar