Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:28:43.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Secular Failure: Sectarianism and Communalism in Shayara Bano v. Union of India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2021

Jeffrey A. Redding
Jeffrey A. Redding*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Proponents of secularism often describe their support for this form of governance in terms of the protections it provides against the excesses, dangers, and coercions of religious governance. In reality, however, the differences between secular and religious systems of governance are often overstated, with secularism’s promises being in conversation with secularism’s failures. This article explores one recent and important instance of such secular failure, namely the high-profile Indian case of Shayara Bano v. Union of India deciding the legal legitimacy of “triple talaq,” a common Indian Muslim divorce practice. During the litigation of this case, a prominent Indian Muslim organization ended up engaging in sectarian modes of argumentation, whereby aspersions were cast on the Muslim bona fides of certain persons and communities. Further, in the course of deciding Shayara Bano, a religiously diverse set of Indian Supreme Court justices found themselves disagreeing along communal lines about either the necessity or ability of the secular state to “reform” Muslim family law. In all this, sectarian and communitarian divisions in India were heightened, and the social peace and religious freedom promised by secularism were severely undermined.

Keywords

IndiasecularismIslamtalaqdivorce
Type
Religious Nationalism and Religious Freedom in Asia
Information
Asian Journal of Law and Society , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 56 - 71
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Asian Journal of Law and Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, Asad (2009) “Advocating a Secular Pakistan: The Munir Report of 1954,” in Metcalf, B.D., ed., Islam in South Asia in Practice, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 424–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, Indira (2018) “Need for Anand Marriage Act for Sikhs & Why It’s in the News Again,” The Quint, 21 January, https://www.thequint.com/explainers/explainer-anand-marriage-act-anand-karaj-sikh-hindu-marriage-act-delhi-govt (accessed 10 September 2019).Google Scholar
Basu, Srimati (2008) “Separate and Unequal: Muslim Women and Un-Uniform Family Law in India.” 10 International Feminist Journal of Politics 495–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC (2019) “Triple Talaq: India Criminalises Muslim ‘Instant Divorce,’” 30 July, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-49160818 (accessed 27 September 2019).Google Scholar
Bhargava, Rajeev (1998) “Introduction,” in Bhargava, R., ed., Secularism and Its Critics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25–7.Google Scholar
Faruqi, Ziya-ul-Hasan (1963) The Deoband School and the Demand for Pakistan, London: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Hindu, The (2019) “Triple ‘Talaq’ Bill Introduced in Lok Sabha amid Opposition Protest,” 21 June, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/fresh-triple-talaq-bill-introduced-in-lok-sabha-amid-opposition-protest/article28097311.ece (accessed 10 September 2019).Google Scholar
Jaffrelot, Christophe (2007) “Secularism,” in Jaffrelot, C., ed., Hindu Nationalism: A Reader, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 313–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Justin (2010) “‘Signs of Churning’: Muslim Personal Law and Public Contestation in Twenty-First Century India.” 44 Modern Asian Studies 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapur, Ratna (2017) “Triple Talaq Verdict: Wherein Lies the Much Hailed Victory?,” The Wire, 28 August, https://thewire.in/gender/triple-talaq-verdict-wherein-lies-the-much-hailed-victory (accessed 10 September 2019).Google Scholar
Mahapatra, Dhananjay (2012) “Can Hindu Law Cover Sikhs, Jains, Asks SC,” Times of India, 13 November, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Can-Hindu-law-cover-Sikhs-Jains-asks-SC/articleshow/17201306.cms (accessed 10 September 2019).Google Scholar
Mandal, Saptarshi (2018) “Out of Shah Bano’s Shadow: Muslim Women’s Rights and the Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Verdict.” 2 Indian Law Review 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Mithi (2009) India in the Shadows of Empire: A Legal and Political History (1774–1950), Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neo, Jaclyn L. (2017) “Secularism without Liberalism: Religious Freedom and Secularism in a Non-Liberal State.” 2017 Michigan State Law Review 333–70.Google Scholar
Redding, Jeffrey A. (2013) “Secularism, The Rule of Law, and ‘Shari‘a Courts’: An Ethnographic Examination of a Constitutional Controversy.” 57 Saint Louis University Law Journal 339–76.Google Scholar
Redding, Jeffrey A. (2016) “Shamim Ara and the Divorce Politics of a Secular and Modern India,” SHARIAsource, https://shariasourceblog.wordpress.com/2016/10/28/case-commentary-shamim-ara-and-the-divorce-politics-of-a-secular-and-modern-india/ (accessed 10 September 2019).Google Scholar
Schonthal, Benjamin (2016) Buddhism, Politics and the Limits of Law: The Pyrrhic Constitutionalism of Sri Lanka, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach (2007) The Politics of The Veil, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Martin (1981) Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharafi, Mitra (2014) Law and Identity in Colonial South Asia: Parsi Legal Culture, 1772–1947, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddiq, M. N. (1995) “Enforced Apostasy: Zaheeruddin v. State and the Official Persecution of the Ahmadiyya Community in Pakistan.” 14 Law & Inequality 275–338.Google Scholar
Siddique, Osama, & Hayat, Zahra (2008) “Unholy Speech and Holy Laws: Blasphemy Laws in Pakistan—Controversial Origins, Design Defects, and Free Speech Implications.” 17 Minnesota Journal of International Law 303–86.Google Scholar
Stephens, Julia (2018) Governing Islam: Law, Empire, and Secularism in South Asia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subramanian, Narendra (2014) Nation and Family: Personal Law, Cultural Pluralism, and Gendered Citizenship in India, Redwood: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wadud, Amina (1999) Qur’an and Woman: Rereading the Sacred Text from a Woman’s Perspective, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar