Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-77pjf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:11:52.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Accommodation to Substantive Equality: Muslim Personal Law, Secular Law, and the Indian Constitution 1985–2015

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Sagnik DUTTA
Sagnik DUTTA*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The adjudication of religious personal laws of minority communities in India has been a domain of contestation between competing claims of cultural autonomy, gender justice, and individual rights. The Supreme Court of India has time and again been confronted with the conflict between the secular law and legislation that protects group rights of minorities. While the existing literature has taken note of the attempts by the Indian state and the judiciary at legal-pluralist interventions to secure gender justice within the framework of personal laws based on religion, there has not been a sustained analysis of the discursive construction of constitutional law in dynamic interaction with the secular law and tenets of religion. This paper attempts to address this important gap in the scholarship using a discourse analysis of the judgments of the Supreme Court of India from 1985 until 2015 pertaining to post-divorce maintenance for Muslim women. I examine how the “rights” of Muslim women are framed in a realm of dynamic interaction between legislation premised on community identity, notions of constitutionalism, and personal laws based on religion to argue that the state adopts an interventionist role in a legal-pluralist paradigm; it further uses the specificity of community identity to foreground a vision of social justice.

Keywords

Muslim personal lawmaintenanceconstitution
Type
Law and Society in South Asia
Information
Asian Journal of Law and Society , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , May 2017 , pp. 191 - 227
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and KoGuan Law School, Shanghai Jiao Tong University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

University of Cambridge, Department of Politics and International Studies. I am grateful for useful comments and insights on the initial draft of this article from the two anonymous peer reviewers, Prof. Werner Menski and Prof. Matthew J. Nelson of the School of Oriental and African Studies, and my PhD supervisor, Prof. Iza Hussin of University of Cambridge. I am also grateful to my former colleagues at OP Jindal Global University, especially colleagues working at the library, for useful reading suggestions. I wish to thank my undergraduate students at the university, especially Tushar Srirana Irrinki, Purushartha Satish, and Manikya Das, for their enthusiasm about the project that motivated me to see it through to its completion. Correspondence to Sagnik Dutta, Corpus Christi College, University of Cambridge, Trumpington St, Cambridge, CB2 1RH, UK. E-mail address: [email protected].

References

Agnes, Flavia (2011a) Family Law: Volume 2: Marriage, Divorce, and Matrimonial Litigation, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Agnes, Flavia (2011b) Family Laws and Constitutional Claims, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Shabeer & Ahmed, Shabeer (2006) “Uniform Civil Code (Article 44 of the Constitution) A Dead Letter.” 67 The Indian Journal of Political Science 545–552.Google Scholar
Bajpai, Rochana (2010) “Cultural Rights of Minorities during Constitution-Making: A Re-Reading,” in G. Mahajan & S. Jodhka, eds., Religion, Community and Development, New Delhi: Routledge, 282–300.Google Scholar
Bajpai, Rochana (2012) “Liberalisms in India: A Sketch,” in B. Jackson & M. Stears, eds., Liberalism as Ideology: Essays in Honour of Michael Freeden, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxi, Upendra (2002) “The (Im)possibility of Constitutional Justice: Semiographic Notes on Indian Constitutionalism,” in Z. Hasan, E. Sridharan, & R. Sudarshan, eds., India’s Living Constitution, London: Permanent Black, 31–63.Google Scholar
Bernard, Russell H. (1988) Research Methods in Cultural Anthropology, London & Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bhat, M. Mohsin Alam (2009) “Constructing Secularism: Separating ‘Religion’ and ‘State’ under the Indian Constitution.” 11 Australian Journal of Asian Law 29–55.Google Scholar
Chandoke, Neera (2002) “Individual and Group Rights: A View from India,” in Z. Hasan, E. Sridharan, & R. Sudarshan, eds., India’s Living Constitution, London: Permanent Black, 207–241.Google Scholar
Coulson, Noel J. (1964) A History of Islamic Law, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Coulson, Noel J. (1978) “Law and Religion in Contemporary Islam.” 29 Hastings Law Journal 1447–1457.Google Scholar
Dhagamwar, Vasudha (1989) Towards the Uniform Civil Code, New Delhi: Indian Law Institute.Google Scholar
Dhagamwar, Vasudha (2003) “Invasion of Criminal Law by Religion, Custom, Family Law.” 28 Economic and Political Weekly 1483–1492.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1985) A Matter of Principle, Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Julia (2004) “Urban Governance and Emergent Forms of Legal Pluralism in Mumbai.” 50 Journal of Legal Pluralism and the Unofficial Law 29–60.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (2001) “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research,” in R. Wodah, & M. Meyer, eds., Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, New Delhi: Sage Publications, 121–138.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1981) “Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering and Indigenous Law.” 19 Journal of Legal Pluralism 1–47.Google Scholar
Griffiths, John (1986) “What Is Legal Pluralism?” 24 Journal of Legal Pluralism 1–55.Google Scholar
Hasan, Zoya (1998) “Gender Politics, Legal Reform, and the Muslim Community in India,” in Patricia Jeffery & Amrita Basu, eds., Appropriating Gender: Women’s Activism and Politicized Religion in South Asia, New York: Routledge, 71–88.Google Scholar
Hasan, Zoya (2014) “Religion, Feminist Politics and Muslim Women’s Rights in India,” in K. Kannabiran, ed., Women and Law: Critical Feminist Perspectives, New Delhi: Sage Publications, 264–273.Google Scholar
Hussin, Iza (2016) The Politics of Islamic Law: Local Elites, Colonial Authority and the Making of the Muslim State, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kishwar, Madhu (1994) “Codified Hindu Law: Myth and Reality.” 33 Economic and Political Weekly 2145–2161.Google Scholar
Kolff, D.H.A. (1992) “The Indian and the British Law Machines: Some Remarks on Law and Society in British India,” in W.J. Mommsen & J. de Moor, eds., European Expansion and Law, Oxford: Berg, 201–236.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will (1989) Liberalism, Community and Culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Tahir (1975) “On Securing a Uniform Civil Code,” in N. Khodie, ed., Readings in Uniform Civil Code, Bombay: Thacker & Co. Ltd, 173–190.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Tahir (1995) Uniform Civil Code: Fiction and Facts, New Delhi: India and Islam Research Council.Google Scholar
Menski, Werner (2003) Hindu Law: Beyond Tradition and Modernity, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Menski, Werner (2008) “The Uniform Civil Code Debate in Indian Law: New Developments and Changing Agenda.” 9 German Law Journal 211–250.Google Scholar
Menski, Werner (2011) “Shah Bano, Narendra Modi and Reality Checks about Global Understandings of Indian Law.” 1 Nirma University Law Journal (Ahmedabad) 7–26.Google Scholar
Menski, Werner (2012) “The Uniform Civil Code Debate in Indian Law: New Developments and Changing Agenda,” in M. McLauren, ed., The Many Faces of India: Law and Politics of the Subcontinent, New Delhi: Samskriti, 136–182.Google Scholar
Menski, Werner (2013) “Governance and Governability in South Asian Family Laws and in Asia,” in L. Holden, ed., Legal Pluralism and Governance in South Asia and in the Diasporas (Special Issue) .” 45 Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 42–57.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1988) “Legal Pluralism.” 22 Law and Society Review 869–896.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk (1972) “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Object of Study.” 7 Law and Society Review 719–746.Google Scholar
Parashar, Archana (2013) “Religious Personal Laws as Non-State Laws: Implications for Gender Justice.” 45 Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 5–23.Google Scholar
Pearl, David & Werner, Menski (1998) Muslim Family Law, London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Redding, Jeffrey A. (2014) “The Case of Ayesha, Muslim ‘Courts’, and the Rule of Law: Some Ethnographic Lessons for Legal Theory.” 48 Modern Asian Studies 940–985.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. (1998) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Ronojoy (2010) Articles of Faith: Religion, Secularism, and the Indian Supreme Court, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sezgin, Yuksel (2013) Human Rights under State-Enforced Religious Family Laws in Israel, Egypt and India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solanki, Gopika (2011) Adjudication in Religious Family Laws: Cultural Accommodation, Legal Pluralism, and Gender Equality in India, Cambridge, Delhi, & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Subramaniam, Narendra (2008) “Legal Change and Gender Inequality: Changes in Muslim Family Law in India.” 33 Law and Social Inquiry 631–672.Google Scholar
Subramaniam, Narendra (2014) Nation and Family: Personal Law, Cultural Pluralism, and Gendered Citizenship in India, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. (2008) “Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global.” 30 Sydney Law Review 375–411.Google Scholar
Vatuk, Sylvia (2008) “Islamic Feminism in India: Indian Muslim Women Activists and the Reform of Muslim Personal Law.” 42 Modern Asian Studies 489–518.Google Scholar
Williams, Rina Verma (2006) Postcolonial Politics and Personal Laws: Colonial Legacies and the Indian state, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar