No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2019
The classic method of teaching comparative law produces students who depend only on course materials. They may gain knowledge of different aspects of the laws and legal systems of various other countries, but find it difficult to conduct research and write on comparative law independently. This paper discusses comparative law teaching methods by examining the experience of teaching comparative criminal law in the Master's Programme in Law at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia. Although it was once sufficient for students to understand comparative law and some aspects of criminal law, the course's learning outcomes have since changed: students are also expected to have the ability to conduct research and write on comparative law upon completing the course. For this shift to take root, several changes are necessary: first, students must become more active in their learning and do more than just receive knowledge passively from course materials provided by their lecturers; second, students should seek out more reference materials beyond the syllabus and learn to use libraries and online databases more effectively; and third, students must improve their mastery of English and other languages, if possible.
SH, MH (Universitas Indonesia), PhD (University of Malaya); Professor of Criminal Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia.
1. The forerunner of UI was founded in 1849 during the colonial era, but the modern university was established by the Indonesian state in 1950, five years after independence. The Faculty of Law was originally established in 1924 by the Dutch colonial authorities as the Rechtshogeschool (School of Law), and it is (together with Medicine, Pharmacy, and Letters) one of the oldest faculties at the university. See generally Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, ‘Sejarah dan Perkembangan [History and Development]’ (Universitas Indonesia) <http://law.ui.ac.id/v3/sejarah-dan-perkembangan/> accessed 16 February 2019.
2. David, René and Brierley, John EC, Major Legal Systems in the World Today: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law (3rd edn, Stevens 1985) 7Google Scholar.
3. These include Professor Bagir Manan (former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and Professor at Padjadjaran University), Professor Aidul Fitriciada (former Head of the Judicial Commission of the Republic of Indonesia and Professor at Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta), Professor Valerine JL Kriekhoff (former Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and Professor at UI), Professor Farida Patittingi (Dean of Hasanuddin University Faculty of Law), Professor Johni Najwan (Rector of Jambi University), Professor Susi Dwi Harijanti (Head of ADPHI and Professor at Padjadjaran University), and Professor Ratno Lukito (Professor at Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University).
4. ‘Indonesian Comparative Law Review’ (University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta) <http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/iclr> accessed 16 February 2019.
5. Suherman, Ade Maman, Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum: Civil Law, Common Law, Hukum Islam [Introduction to Comparative Legal Systems: Civil Law, Common Law, Islamic Law] (Rajagrafindo Persada 2004) 90–96Google Scholar.
6. ibid 8.
7. ibid 29.
8. ibid 62.
9. ibid 77.
10. Atmasasmita, Romli, Perbandingan Hukum Pidana [Comparative Criminal Law] (Mandar Maju 2000) 55Google Scholar.
11. ibid.
12. Arief, Barda Nawawi, Perbandingan Hukum Pidana [Comparative Criminal Law] (Rajagrafindo Persada 2010) 106–108Google Scholar.
13. Hamzah, Andi, Perbandingan Hukum Pidana di Beberapa Negara [Comparative Criminal Law in Several Countries] (2nd edn, Sinar Grafika 1995) 6–9Google Scholar.
14. David and Brierley (n 2) 6.
15. ibid 8.
16. ibid.
17. ibid 16–17.
18. de Cruz, Peter, A Modern Approach to Comparative Law (Kluwer 1993) 14–15Google Scholar.
19. David and Brierley (n 2) 16–17.
20. ibid.
21. de Cruz (n 18) 15.
22. Zweigert, K and Kötz, H, An Introduction to Comparative Law (Weir, Tony tr, 3rd edn, OUP 1998) 15Google Scholar.
23. ibid.
24. Hug, Walther, ‘The History of Comparative Law’ (1932) 45 Harvard Law Review 1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
25. David and Brierley (n 2).
26. de Cruz (n 18).
27. Zweigert and Kötz (n 22).
28. de Cruz (n 18) 14–15.
29. Merryman, John Henry, The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America (Stanford University Press 1969) 2Google Scholar.
30. Merryman, John Henry, ‘Comparative Law and Social Change: On the Origins, Style, Decline & Revival of the Law and Development Movement’ (1977) 25 American Journal of Comparative Law 457CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
31. de Cruz (n 18) 29–30.
32. ibid (according to Schnitzer).
33. ibid (according to Arminjon, Nolde, and Wolff).
34. ibid (according to David).
35. ibid (according to Glasson and Sarfatti).
36. ibid (according to Zweigert and Kötz).
37. ibid 30–34.
38. Sammut, Ivan, Constructing Modern European Private Law: A Hybrid System (Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2016) 48Google Scholar.
39. de Cruz (n 18) 33.
40. Aun, Wu Min, An Introduction to the Malaysian Legal System (Heinemann Educational Books 1975) 17Google Scholar.
41. de Cruz (n 18) 37.
42. de Cruz (n 18) 38–39.
43. See eg ‘Asean Legal Information Portal’ (Asean LIP) <www.aseanlip.com/> accessed 16 February 2019.