Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T19:44:37.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wrongful Convictions and the Culture of Denial in Japanese Criminal Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

David T. Johnson
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The release of Hakamada Iwao from death row in March 2014 after 48 years of incarceration provides an opportunity to reflect on wrongful convictions in Japanese criminal justice. My approach is comparative because this problem cannot be understood without asking how Japan compares with other countries: to know only one country is to know no country well. Comparison with the United States is especially instructive because there have been many studies of wrongful conviction there and because the U.S. and Japan are the only two developed democracies that retain capital punishment and continue to carry out executions on a regular basis. On the surface, the United States seems to have a more serious problem with wrongful convictions than Japan, but this gap is more apparent than real. To reduce the problem of wrongful convictions in Japanese criminal justice, reformers must confront a culture of denial that makes it difficult for police, prosecutors, and judges to acknowledge their own mistakes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Asia-Pacific Journal , Volume 13 , Issue 6 , February 2015 , e3
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015

References

Committee for the Protection of Human Rights. October 1998. “Empirical Research on the Causes of Wrongful Conviction.” Tokyo: Nihon Bengoshi Rengokai. [誤判原因の実証的研究 1998/10/1Google Scholar
日本弁護士連合会人権擁護委員会Google Scholar
Committee for the Protection of Human Rights. November 2009. “Attacking the Causes of Wrongful Conviction: Perspectives and Techniques of Criminal Defense.” Tokyo: Nihon Bengoshi Rengokai. [ 誤判原因に迫る 刑事弁護の視点と技術 単行本2009/11/18日本弁護士連合会人権擁護委員会.Google Scholar
Davis, John H., Jr. 2014. “Courting Justice, Contesting ‘Bureaucratic Informality’: The Sayama Case and the Evolution of Buraku Liberation Politics.” In Steinhoff, Patricia G., editor. Going to Court to Change Japan: Social Movements and the Law in Contemporary Japan. Ann Arbor: Center for Japanese Studies, The University of Michigan, 2014, pp. 73–100.Google Scholar
Death Penalty Information Center. 2014. Ezoe, Hiromasa. 2010. Where Is the Justice? Media Attacks, Prosecutorial Abuse, and My 13 Years in Japanese Court. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
Flybjerg, Bent. 1998. Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Foote, Daniel H. 1992. “From Japan's Death Row to Freedom.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal. Vol. 1, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 11–103.Google Scholar
Huff, C. Ronald, and Killias, Martin, editors. 2008. Wrongful Conviction: International Perspectives on Miscarriages of Justice (Temple University Press).Google Scholar
Huff, C. Ronald, and Killias, Martin, editors. 2013. Wrongful Convictions and Miscarriages of Justice: Causes and Remedies in North American and European Criminal Justice Systems (Routledge).Google Scholar
Ibusuki, Makoto. 2014. “Subete no Shoko Kaiji o Isoge: Hakamada Jiken no Kyokun.” Asahi Shimbun, May 9.Google Scholar
Innocence Project. 2014. Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, New York City.Google Scholar
Japan Federation of Bar Associations. 1999. “Atarashii Seiki no Keiji Tetsuzuki o Motomete.”Google Scholar
Japan Times. 2014. “Tiny Progress in Interrogations.” August 1.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. 1972. Conspiracy at Matsukawa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2002. The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan (Oxford University Press). Translated into Japanese as Amerikajin no Mita Nihon no Kensatsu Seido: Nichibei no Hikaku Kosatsu (Springer-Verlag, 2004).Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2013. “Progress and Problems in Japanese Capital Punishment.” In Confronting Capital Punishment in Asia: Human Rights, Politics, and Public Opinion, edited by Roger Hood and Surya Deva (Oxford University Press), pp. 168–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, Jeff. 2011. “Justice on Trial: Japanese Prosecutors Under Fire.” Asia-Pacific Journal, Volume 9, Issue 10, No. 1 (March 7).Google Scholar
Kitani, Akira. 2013. “Muzai” o Minuku: Saibankan Kitani Akira no Ikikata (as told to and edited by Yamada Ryuji and Katayama Tsukasa). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, M. 1998. Nihon Keisatsu no Genzai (Iwanami Shoten).Google Scholar
Liebman, James S., Fagan, Jeffrey, and West, Valerie. 2000. “A Broken System: Error Rates in Capital Cases, 1973-1995.” Columbia Law School, Public Law Research Paper No.15 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, James S., et al. 2014. The Wrong Carlos: Anatomy of a Wrongful Execution (Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Masuda, Michiko. 2009. Fukuda kun o Koroshite Nani ni Naru: Hikari shi Boshi Satsugai Jiken no Kansei. Tokyo: Inshidentsu.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo. 1992. Policing in Japan: A Study on Making Crime. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
National Institute of Justice. 2014. Mending Justice: Sentinel Event Reviews. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. National Registry of Exonerations. 2014.Google Scholar
Nishijima, Katsuhiko. 2012. “Enzai Jiken Ichiranhyo: Kaisetsu.” In Enzai, Nichibenren Kyumei, Genin Kikan, Daisansha Gurupu, Wakingu, editors. Enzai Gen'in o Chosa Seyo: Kokkai ni Daisansha Kikan no Setchi o (Keiso Shobo), pp. 155–168.Google Scholar
Nose, Hiroyuki, et al. 1981. Gohan no Kenkyu: Nishi Doitsu no Saishin Jirei no Bunseki [translation of Karl Peters, “Fehlerquellen im Strafprozess: Eine Untersuchung der Wiederanfnahmeverfahren in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland,” originally published in 1974]. Sapporo: Hokkaido Daigaku Tosho Kankokai.Google Scholar
Peltz, Jennifer. 2014. “Convictions Get a Second Look.” Honolulu Star-Advertiser. June 8, p. A8.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Kensatsucho, Saiko. 1986. “Saishin Muzai Jiken Kento Kekka Hokoku: Menda, Saitagawa, Matsuyama kaku Jiken.” Pp. 1–229.Google Scholar
Schulz, Kathryn. 2010. Being Wrong: Adventures in the Margin of Error (Ecco).Google Scholar
Sekai. 2014. “Tokushu: Enzai wa Naze Kurikaesu no ka: Keiji Shiho Kaikaku no Yukue.” No. 857 (June): 65–134.Google Scholar
Simon, Dan. 2012. In Doubt: The Psychology of the Criminal Justice Process (Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suo, Masayuki. 2014. “Intabyu: Torishirabe Kashika Mazu Ippo: Taisho Jiken 2% demo Okina Kusabi Zenkatei Jisshi ni Igi.” Asahi Shimbun, August 2, p. 15.Google Scholar
Takano, Takashi. 2007. “Jijitsu Nintei wa Shimin ni Makaseta hoga Yoi.” Keiji Saiban o Kangaeru blog, January 7, 2007.Google Scholar
Takano, Takashi. 2009. “Nihon no Kensatsu wa Hetare na no ka.” Keiji Saiban o Kangaeru blog, June 14 and June 23, 2009.Google Scholar
Tavris, Carol, and Aronson, Elliot. 2007. Mistakes Were Made (but not by me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts (Harcourt).Google Scholar
Yomiuri Shimbun. 2014. “Torishirabe Kashika Gimuzuke: Hoseishimbukai Shiho Torihiki mo Donyu.” July 10, p. 1.Google Scholar