Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:05:18.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Should we just send a copy? Digitisation, usefulness and users

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Melissa Terras*
Affiliation:
Department of Information Studies, Henry Morley Building, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Get access

Abstract

Over the last decade, most libraries, archives and museums have undertaken some form of digitisation project, making digital surrogates of their collections available for users. We are now at a stage where we must ask: how are these resources being used? Why are they used, and by whom? Does digitisation live up to its rhetoric of improving scholarship, and improving access?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Terras, Melissa, Digital images for the information professional (London: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
2. Gregory, Richard L., Eye and brain: the psychology of seeing (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
3. Livingstone, Margaret, Vision and art: the biology of seeing (New York: Abrams, 2002).Google Scholar
4. Hughes, Robert, Things I didn’t know (London: Knopf, 2006), 223.Google Scholar
5. Terras, , Digital images.Google Scholar
6. Naughton, John, A brief history of the future: origins of the Internet (London: Phoenix Press, 2000).Google Scholar
7. Terras, , Digital images.Google Scholar
8. Deegan, Marilyn and Tanner, Simon, Digital futures: strategies for the information age (London: Library Association Publishing, 2002), 32.Google Scholar
9. Lee, Stuart D., Digital imaging, a practical handbook (London: Facet Publishing, 2002);Google Scholar
Hughes, Lorna, Digitizing collections: strategic issues for the information manager (London: Facet Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar
10. Tanner, Deegan, Digital futures.Google Scholar
11. Thaller, Manfred, ‘The processing of manuscripts,’ in Images and manuscripts in historical computing, ed. Thaller, Manfred, 4172 (Göttingen: Max Planck Institute, 1992), 2.Google Scholar
12. Lazinger, Susan S., Digital preservation and metadata: history, theory and practice (Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 2001).Google Scholar
13. Baca, Murtha, ed. Introduction to art image access: tools, standards, and strategies (Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2002), http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/intro_aia/.Google Scholar
14. O’Connell, P.L., ‘One picture, 1,000 tags,’ New York Times, 28 March 2007, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/28/arts/artsspecial/28social.html.Google Scholar
15. Chun, Susan, Cherry, Rich, Hiwiller, Doug, Trant, Jennifer and Wyman, Bruce, ‘Steve museum: an ongoing experiment in social tagging, folksonomy, and museums,’ in Museums and the web 2006: proceedings, ed. Trant, Jennifer and Bearman, David (Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics, 2006), http://www.archimuse.com/mw2006/papers/wy man/wy man.html.Google Scholar
16. Warwick, C., Terras, Melissa, Huntington, P. and Pappa, N., ‘If you build it will they come? The LAIRAH Study: quantifying the use of online resources in the arts and humanities through statistical analysis of user log data,’ Literary and linguistic computing 23, no.1 (2008): 85102.Google Scholar
17. Gorman, G.E. and Clayton, Peter, Qualitative research for the information professional: a practical handbook (London: Facet, 2004).Google Scholar
18. Warwick, , ‘If you build it.’Google Scholar
19. Sandore, Beth, ‘What users want from digital image collections,’ in Moving theory into practice: digital imaging for libraries and archives, Kenney, Anne R. and Reiger, Oya Y., 45 (Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group, 2000).Google Scholar
20. Arts and Humanities Research Council, Review activities. ICT in arts and humanities research, http://www.ahrcict.rdg.ac.uk/activities/review/index.htm.Google Scholar
21. Arts and Humanities Research Council, ‘Important information for applicants to AHRC June deadline,’ AHRC News & Press Releases, 14 May 2007. This was at http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/news/news_pr/2007/information_for_applicants_ to_AHRC_june_deadline.asp.Google Scholar
22. Terras, , Digital images.Google Scholar
24. British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC News, ‘European online library crashes,’ 21 November 2008, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7742390.stm.Google Scholar