Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T10:02:51.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The photo archive as laboratory. Art history, photography, and materiality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2019

Costanza Caraffa
Costanza Caraffa*
Affiliation:
Leiterin / Head, Photothek of the Kunsthistorisches Institut in Florenz – Max Planck Institute, Palazzo Grifoni Budini Gattai, Via dei Servi 51, 50122 Florence, Italy Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Librarians, archivists, and curators today meet unique challenges when facing huge numbers of photographs accumulated in their institutions. Coming to terms with these masses in a responsible way means to reflect on cataloguing and digitization standards able to record their (material) complexity. It also means to constantly justify a series of investments: in cataloguing and digitization projects, but also in storage space, restoration, archival and conservation materials, not to speak of human resources. It means, ultimately, to reflect on the systems of value that one decides to apply while dealing with these holdings: the dematerialization rhetoric that often goes hand-in-hand with digitization campaigns tends to increase their fragility, on the other side we are confronted more and more often with the ‘contemporary repackaging of erstwhile ephemeral and disposable photographic prints' that acquire a new ‘archival value’.1 In this short essay I will focus on these systems of value. My aim is to offer some methodological tools to deal with documentary photographs in art historical institutions. These instruments derive from the intersection of photographic and archival theories and practices that shaped my experience as Head of the Photothek at the Kunsthistorisches Institut in Florenz, Max Planck Institute, for more than a decade.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 37 - 46
Copyright
© ARLIS, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nina Lager Vestberg, Archival Value. On Photography, Materiality and Indexicality, in: Photographies 1(1), 2008, 49–65.

2. Edwards, Elizabeth, “Thoughts on the ‘Non-Collections’ of the Archival Ecosystem,” in Photo-Objects. On the Materiality of Photographs and Photo Archives in the Humanities and Sciences, ed. Bärnighausen, Julia, Caraffa, Costanza, Klamm, Stefanie, Schneider, Franka and Wodtke, Petra (Berlin: EOA, 2019), 69–84Google Scholar. See also: Edwards, Elizabeth and Morton, Christopher A., eds., Photograph, Museums, Collections. Between Art and Information (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015)Google Scholar.

3. Edwards, Elizabeth and Lien, Sigrid, eds., Uncertain Images: Museums and the Work of Photographs (Farnham: Ashgate, 2014)Google Scholar.

4. Among the most important publications are Hamber, Anthony J., A Higher Branch of the Art. Photographing the Fine Arts in England 1839–1880 (Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach, 1996)Google Scholar; Johnson, Geraldine A., Sculpture and Photography: Envisioning the Third Dimension (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998)Google Scholar; Caraffa, Costanza, ed., Photo Archives and the Photographic Memory of Art History (Berlin – Munich: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 2011)Google Scholar; Peters, Dorothea, “Auf Spurensuche. Giovanni Morelli und die Fotografie,” in Zeigen und/oder beweisen? Die Fotografie als Kulturtechnik und Medium des Wissens, ed. Wolf, Herta (Berlin – Boston: De Gruyter, 2016), 15–43Google Scholar; Hamill, Sarah and Luke, Megan R., eds., Photography and Sculpture: The Art Object in Reproduction (Los Angeles: The Getty Research Institute, 2017)Google Scholar.

5. Schwartz, Joan M., “We Make Our Tools and Our Tools Make Us: Lessons from Photographs for the Practice, Politics and Poetics of Diplomatics,” Archivaria 40 (Fall 1995): 40–74Google Scholar, here 45.

6. Here the seminal writings are Schwartz, “We Make Our Tools”; Pinney, Christopher, Camera Indica. The Social Life of Indian Photographs (London: Reaktion Books, 1997)Google Scholar; Edwards, Elizabeth, Raw Histories: Photographs, Anthropology and Museums (Oxford: Berg, 2001)Google Scholar; Edwards, Elizabeth and Hart, Janice, eds., Photographs Objects Histories: on the Materiality of Images, (London: Routledge 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For an overview, see Costanza Caraffa, “Photographic Itineraries in Time and Space. Photographs as Material Objects,” in Handbook of Photography Studies, ed. Gil Pasternak (London: Bloomsbury Academic, forthcoming).

7. Caraffa, Costanza, “From ‘Photo Libraries‘ to ‘Photo Archives’: on the Epistemological Potential of Art-historical Photo Collections,” in Photo Archives and the Photographic Memory of Art History, ed. Caraffa, Costanza (Berlin – Munich: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 2011), 11–44Google Scholar.

8. Schwartz, Joan M., “‘Records of Simple Truth and Precision:’ Photography, Archives, and the Illusion of Control,” Archivaria 50 (Fall 2000): 1–40Google Scholar; Cook, Terry and Schwartz, Joan M., eds., “Archives, Records, and Power,” double monographic issue of Archival Science: International Journal on Recorded Information 2, no. 1–2 and 3–4 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9. Hubert, Hans W., Das Kunsthistorische Institut in Florenz: von der Gründung bis zum hundertjährigen Jubiläum (1897–1997) (Florence: Il Ventilabro, 1997)Google Scholar.

10. For the history of the Photothek see Dercks, Ute, “Wenn das Sammeln zur ‘fixen Idee‘ wird: Die frühen Fotokampagnen des Kunsthistorischen Instituts in Florenz,” Rundbrief Fotografie 22, no. 2 (2015): 7–18Google Scholar.

11. Here I just mention the series of international conferences “Photo Archives” as well as the “Florence Declaration – Recommendations for the Preservation of Analogue Photo Archives” (more on http://www.khi.fi.it/PhotoLibrary, accessed November 1, 2018).

12. Gaier, Martin, “’Die heilige Ursula hängt mir schon ellenlang zum Hals heraus’: Gustav Ludwig tra storia artistica e culturale 1895–1905,” in Presenze tedesche a Venezia, ed. Winter, Susanne (Rome: Ed. di Storia e Letteratura, 2005), 131–175Google Scholar.

13. Ludwig, Gustav, “Bonifazio di Pitati da Verona: eine archivalische Untersuchung,” Jahrbuch der Preußischen Kunstsammlungen 1–2 (1901): 61–78Google Scholar, 180–199; 3 (1902): 36–66.

14. Marconi, Sandra Moschini, Gallerie dell'Accademia di Venezia. Opere d'arte del secolo XVI (Rome: Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato, 1962), 37–66Google Scholar; Cottrell, Philip, “Corporate Colors: Bonifacio and Tintoretto at the Palazzo dei Camerlenghi in Venice,” The Art Bulletin 82 (2000): 658–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15. Caraffa, Costanza and Goldhahn, Almut, “Fotografien als Forschungsobjekte. Der Nachlass Gustav Ludwigs in der Photothek des Kunsthistorischen Instituts in Florenz,” in Fotografie und Film im Archiv: Sammeln, Bewahren, Erforschen, ed. Ziehe, Irene and Hägele, Ulrich (Münster – New York – Munich – Berlin: Waxmann, 2013), 73–84Google Scholar, here 79.

16. Ludwig had attended courses of photography at the Lehr- und Versuchsanstalt für Photographie und Reproduktionsverfahren in Vienna. Gaier, “Die heilige Ursula,” 140.

17. Verein zur Erhaltung des Kunsthistorischen Instituts in Florenz e.V., Kunsthistorisches Institut in Florenz. Jahresbericht, 1905–1906, 4. The concept of the social biography of objects is derived from Appadurai, Arjun, ed., The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18. Dercks, Ute, “’And Because the Use of the Photographic Device is Impossible Without a Proper Card Catalog.…’: the Typological-stylistic Arrangement and the Subject Cross-reference Index of the KHI’s Photothek (1897–1930s),” Visual resources (2014): 181–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here 190.

19. In preparation of the online exhibition “Gustav Ludwig. The Photographic Bequest,” (http://photothek.khi.fi.it/documents/oau/00000045, accessed October 25, 2018).

20. Cook, Terry, “From Information to Knowledge: An Intellectual Paradigm for Archives,” Archivaria, vol. 19 (Winter 1984–85): 28–49Google Scholar.

21. Schwartz, Joan M., “Coming to Terms with Photographs: Descriptive Standards, Linguistic ‘Othering’, and the Margins of Archivy,” Archivaria 54 (2002): 142–171Google Scholar.

22. Schwartz, “We Make Our Tools,” 62.

23. Favero, Paolo S. H., The Present Image. Visible Stories in a Digital Habitat (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018)Google Scholar.

24. Gabrys, Jennifer, Digital Rubbish: A Natural History of Electronics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Maxwell, Richard, Raundalen, Jon and Vestberg, Nina Lager, eds., Media and the Ecological Crisis (London: Routledge, 2015)Google Scholar.

25. Were, Graeme and Favero, Paolo S. H., eds., Imaging Digital Lives: Participation, Politics and Identity in Indigenous, Diaspora, and Marginal Communities, special issue of Journal of Material Culture, 18 (2013), no. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Miller, Daniel, “Photography in the Age of Snapchat,” Anthropology & Photography, vol. 1 (2015), London: Royal Anthropological InstituteGoogle Scholar, Online Open-Access; Walton, Shireen, “Photographic Truth in Motion: The Case of Iranian Photoblogs,” Anthropology & Photography, vol. 4 (2016), London: Royal Anthropological InstituteGoogle Scholar, Online Open-Access.

26. Edwards and Lien, Uncertain Images, 4–5; Caraffa, Costanza, “Manzoni in the Phototek, Photographic Archives as Ecosystems,” in Instant presence. Representing Art in Photography: in Honor of Josef Sudek (1896–1976), ed. Buddeus, Hana, Mašterová, Katarína and Lahoda, Vojtěch (Prague: Artefactum, Institute of Art History of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 2017), 121–136Google Scholar; Edwards, “Thoughts on the ‘Non-Collections’”.

27. Alpers, Svetlana, “The Museum as a Way of Seeing,” in Exhibiting Cultures, ed. Karp, Ivan and Lavine, Steven D. (Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1991), 25–32Google Scholar, here 26.

28. Edwards, Raw histories, 5 with reference to Hoskins, Janet, Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People's Lives (New York: Routledge, 1998)Google Scholar for the relation between “little narratives” and “big narratives”.

29. Kratz, Corinne A., “Rhetorics of Value: Constituting Worth and Meaning through Cultural Display,” Visual Anthropology Review 27, no. 1 (Spring 2011), 21–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.