Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:57:00.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nineteenth Century Wood Engraving: its commercial decline

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2016

Jan Conway
Jan Conway*
Affiliation:
Director of Library and Student Services, University for the Creative Arts, Falkner Road, Farnham, Surrey, GU9 7DS, United Kingdom Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The use of wood engraving as a method of graphic reproduction for books, periodicals and newspapers continued for a surprisingly long time after the development of photographic methods. End-grain boxwood engraving was a truly Victorian phenomenon and an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, versatility and limitations of this technique may perhaps best be reached through an exploration of its commercial decline. The period 1860–1900 saw a combination of competing technical, economic and aesthetic demands influencing the development of illustrative processes and eventually led to the end of commercial wood engraving. A form of engraving closer to Bewick's original interpretation of the craft re-emerged through the arts and crafts movement and the establishment of private presses during the inter-war period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , October 2016 , pp. 224 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © ARLIS/UK&Ireland 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lambert, Susan, Printmaking (London: HMSO, 1983)Google Scholar

2. Chamberlain, W., Wood Engraving (London: Thames and Hudson, 1978)Google Scholar

3. Pennell, Joseph, The illustration of books: a manual for the use of students; notes for a course of lectures at the Slade School, University College (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1896), 93Google Scholar.

4. De Maré, Eric, The Victorian woodblock illustrators (London: Gordon Fraser, 1980), 7Google Scholar.

5. Brown, J. Buchanan, ‘British wood engravers c. 1820–60 a check list,’ Journal of the Printing Historical Society (No. 17 1982–3)Google Scholar.

6. Chamberlain, Wood Engraving, 30.

7. Woodward, D., “The decline of commercial wood engraving in nineteenth century America,” Journal of the Printing Historical Society 10 (1974–5): 58 Google Scholar.

8. The blocks used for the Christmas number of the Illustrated London News, 1882 were said to have yielded some 425,000 impressions and were still useable. Even if the blocks involved had been duplicated this is still an impressive figure, see Jackson, Mason, The pictorial press, its origin and progress (London: Hurst and Blackett, 1885), 326Google Scholar.

9. Reid, Forrest, Illustration of the Sixties (London: Faber and Gwyer, 1928), 41Google Scholar.

10. Fildes, P., ‘Phototransfer of drawings in woodblock engraving,’ Journal of the Printing Historical Society (No. 5, 1974–5): 87 Google Scholar.

11. Wakeman, Geoffrey, Victorian book illustration, the technical revolution (Newton Abbot: David and Charles, 1973), 84Google Scholar.

12. These words are ascribed to Felix Bracquemond Painter and Etcher, 1833–1914 by Newton, Charles, Photography in printmaking (London: V&A, Compton, Pitman, 1979), 12Google Scholar.

13. Thorpe, J., English illustration: the Nineties (New York: Hacker, 1975): 10Google Scholar Thorpe states that the first line block illustration was of a map.

14. A useful source of further information on these and other screened photomechanical processes, written at the time they were being developed is by Sir Wood, Henry Truman Wright, Modern methods of illustrating books (London: E. Stock, 1887)Google Scholar.

15. De Maré, The Victorian woodblock illustrators, 189.

16. Linton, W.J., “The decline of wood engraving” in The book lover's almanac for 1895 (New York: Duprat, 1894), 41Google Scholar.

17. Linton “The decline of wood engraving,” 46.

18. Chamberlain, Wood Engraving, 48.