Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:00:57.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The library examined: A workshop collaboration between OOMK, Thick/er Black Lines and Senate House Library

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2019

Laurence Byrne
Affiliation:
Research Librarian: Latin American and Commonwealth Studies, Senate House Library, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU, UK Email: [email protected]
Leila Kassir
Affiliation:
Research Librarian: British, USA & Commonwealth Literature, Senate House Library, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU, UK Email: [email protected]
Hudda Khaireh
Affiliation:
Thick/er Black Lineshttp://thickerblacklines.com/
Heiba Lamara
Affiliation:
Assistant Editor: OOMK (One of My Kind), Rabbits Road Press, 835 Romford Road, London E12 5JY, UK Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The Library Examined was a workshop held in January 2018 at Senate House Library, University of London. The workshop was designed and facilitated by Heiba Lamara and Rose Nordin from OOMK and Hudda Khaireh from Thick/er Black Lines in discussion with Laurence Byrne and Leila Kassir, Research Librarians at Senate House Library. The Library Examined was aimed at non-library-card-holders with the ambition to help demystify library processes and spaces and to provide a forum for the discussion and critiquing of the organisation of knowledge within the library. This article describes in the first three sections the librarians’ view of the workshop and why it was initiated, before Heiba and Hudda outline their invitation and research, and the workshop itself.

A version of this paper was presented at the annual conference of ARLIS UK & Ireland held at the Architectural Association, London, in July 2018.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© ARLIS, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Beilin, Ian. “The Academic Research Library's White Past and Present.” in Topographies of Whiteness: Mapping Whiteness in Library and Information Science, edited by Schlesselman-Tarango, Gina, Sacramento, CA: Library Juice Press, 2017 pp. 7796Google Scholar

2. Mellon, Constance A.Library Anxiety: a Grounded Theory and its Development.” College and Research Libraries, Vol.47, No.2, (1986), pp. 160165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Howard, Sara A. and Knowlton, Steven A.Browsing Through Bias: the Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA StudiesLibrary Trends, Vol. 67, No.1, (Summer 2018), pp. 7488CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Olson, Hope. “The Power to Name: Representations in Library Catalog,” Signs, Vol. 26, No. 3 (Spring, 2001), pp. 639668CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Wytner, SylviaIs ‘development’ a Purely Empirical Concept Or Also Teleological?: A Perspective from ‘we the Underdeveloped.’” in Prospects for recovery and sustainable development in Africa, edited by Yansane, Aguibou Y. (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1996), 299316Google Scholar

6. Silva, Denise Ferreira da. Toward a Global Idea of Race. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007Google Scholar