Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:24:47.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Inspiration’ and how it is found: Exploring psychological and information behaviour theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2020

Cait Peterson
Cait Peterson*
Affiliation:
Assistant Academic Support Librarian, Chelsea College of Arts, University of the Arts London, 16 John Islip Street, LondonSW1P 4JU, UK Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

‘Inspiration’ is a concept that comes up frequently in the Library and Information Science literature on artists and designers. But what do we mean by ‘inspiration’? This article discusses a selection of the psychological research on creativity and inspiration, as well as four information behaviour theories that help in finding inspiration - browsing, information encountering, satisficing, and serendipity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , July 2020 , pp. 85 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © ARLIS, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cait Peterson, “The artist, the muse, and the library: exploring ‘inspiration’ and the library's potential role in the creative process,” (MA diss., City University London, 2013).

2. Hemmig, William S., “The information-seeking behavior of visual artists: a literature review,”Journal of documentation, 64, no. 3, (2008): 343-362CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Summarised more concisely in Hemmig, William, “An empirical study of the information-seeking behavior of practicing visual artists,” Journal of documentation, 65, no. 4, (2009): 683CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3. Mason, Helen and Robinson, Lyn, “The information-related behaviour of emerging artists and designers: inspiration and guidance for new practitioners,”Journal of documentation, 67, no. 1 (2011): 167-176CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. For an example of an LIS article incorporating the psychological research on creativity, see Daniels, Rebecca, “Developing a research-led practice: a case study examining the information needs and behaviours of first year undergraduates at the University for the Creative Arts,” Art libraries journal, 43, no. 3 (2018): 143-148CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5. Sternberg, Robert J. and Lubart, Todd I., “The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms,” in Handbook of creativity, ed. Sternberg, Robert J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999): 3Google Scholar. For those who are interested, this book chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the psychological research into creativity.

6. Thrash, Todd M. et al. “The psychology of inspiration,” Social and personality psychology compass, 8/9, (2014): 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. Thrash, Todd M. et al. , “Inspiration and the creative process,” in Creativity and mental illness, ed. Kaufman, James C. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 356Google Scholar.

8. Wallas, Graham, The art of thought (Tunbridge Wells, UK: Solis Press, 2014): 38-39Google Scholar.

9. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, “Flow: psychology, creativity, & optimal experience,” interview by Howard Gardner, directed by Robert Dinozzi, Into the Classroom Media, 2004: 1:30, Kanopy.

10. Csikszentmihalyi, interview, 14:00.

11. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, Creativity: the psychology of discovery and invention (New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2013): 111-113Google Scholar.

12. Peterson, “The artist, the muse, and the library,” 68.

13. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, “Flow, the secret of happiness,” filmed February 2004, at TED2004, Monterey, CA, video, 5:00, https://www.ted.com/talks/mihaly_csikszentmihalyi_flow_the_secret_to_happiness.

14. Thrash et al., “The psychology of inspiration,” 495.

15. Thrash, Todd M. and Elliot, Andrew J., “Inspiration as a psychological construct,” Journal of personality and social psychology, 84, no. 4 (2003): 871CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

16. Todd et al., “The psychology of inspiration,” 496-497. Emphasis in original.

17. Thrash, Todd M. and Elliot, Andrew J., “Inspiration: core characteristics, component process, antecedents, and function,” Journal of personality and social psychology, 87, no. 6 (2004): 958-959CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18. Thrash et al., “Inspiration and the creative process,” 347-348.

19. Thrash et al., “Inspiration and the creative process,” 353.

20. Victoria C. Oleynick et al., “The scientific study of inspiration in the creative process: challenges and opportunities,” Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, article 436 (June 2014): 2.

21. Thrash et al., “Inspiration and the creative process,” 355-357.

22. Thrash et al., “Inspiration and the creative process,” 357-358.

23. Peterson, “The artist, the muse, and the library,” 71.

24. Hemmig, “An empirical study”, 684.

25. Marcia J. Bates, “What is browsing -- really? A model drawing from behavioural science research,” Information research, 12, no. 4 (October 2007), http://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/paper330.html.

26. Cobbledick, Susie, “The information-seeking behaviour of artists: exploratory interviews,” The library quarterly, 66, no. 4, (October 1996): 362Google Scholar.

27. Cobbledick, “The information-seeking behaviour of artists,” 362.

28. Mason and Robinson, “The information-related behaviour,” 178.

29. Erdelez, Sanda, “Information encountering,” in Theories of information behavior, ed. Fisher, Karen E., Erdelez, Sanda and McKechnie, Lynne (Medford, N.J.: Information Today, Inc., 2005): 181Google Scholar.

30. Erdelez, “Information encountering,” 179.

31. Bates, Marcia J., “An introduction to metatheories, theories, and models,” in Theories of information behavior, ed. Fisher, Karen E., Erdelez, Sanda and McKechnie, Lynne (Medford, N.J.: Information Today, Inc., 2005): 4Google Scholar.

32. Makri, Stephann and Blandford, Ann, “Coming across information serendipitously – Part 2: A classification framework,” Journal of documentation, 68, no. 5 (2012): 706Google Scholar.

33. Makri, Stephann and Blandford, Ann, “Coming across information serendipitously – Part 1: A Process model,” Journal of documentation, 68, no. 5, (2012): 692Google Scholar.

34. Cobbledick, “The information-seeking behaviour of artists,” 344.

35. Thrash et al., “The psychology of inspiration,” 495.

36. Sternberg and Lubart, “The concept of creativity,” 5.

37. Peterson, “The artist, the muse, and the library,” 56.

38. Hendon, Zoë and Sandino, Linda, “Inspiration examined: towards a methodology,” Art, design, & communication in Higher Education, 17, no. 2 (2018): 148CrossRefGoogle Scholar.