Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T15:14:54.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finding lost relations: identifying our ephemera files

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Jacqueline Cooke
Jacqueline Cooke*
Affiliation:
Visual Arts & Visual Cultures, Goldsmiths, University of London, Lewisham Way, New Cross, London, SE14 6NW
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Art ephemera are an evocative resource that can document innovative art and convey diverse histories. This article looks at the relationship between such ephemera and contemporary art practices, and at the relative values given to ephemera by artists, curators and librarians and, in this context, considers integrated catalogues and online guides as methods of re-contextualising art ephemera in the library. Recent collaborative initiatives, and projects that identify and locate artists’ files are reviewed here and three themes are identified: the biographical approach, interfaces for distributed catalogues and the integration of art and its documentation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 31 , Special Issue 4: Ephemera as a research resource: special issue , 2006 , pp. 33 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ault, Julie, ‘For the record’, in Alternative art New York: 1965-1985, edited by Ault, Julie, 1-16 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000).Google Scholar
2. Goldsmiths University of London, ‘Women’s Art Library/Make’, http://make.gold.ac.uk/.Google Scholar
3. Ault, Alternative art New York, p.3. Google Scholar
4. Phillpot, Clive, ‘Flies in the files: ephemera in the art library’, Art documentation 14 (Spring 1995): 14.Google Scholar
5. Museum of Modern Art website, http://www.moma.org.Google Scholar
6. Now at the Getty Research Institute.Google Scholar
7. Pagé, Suzanne, ‘Preface’, in Life/live (Paris: Musées de la Ville de Paris, 1996), vol. 1, p.8. Exhibition catalogue.Google Scholar
8. Blazwick, Iwona, ed., Century city: art and culture in the modem metropolis (London: Tate Publishing, 2001), pp.72–95. Exhibition catalogue.Google Scholar
9. Extra art: a survey of ‘artists’ ephemera, 1960-1999 (Santa Monica, Calif: Smart Art Press, 2001). Catalogue of an exhibition curated by Steven Leiber at California College of Arts and Crafts, San Francisco, 12 October-8 December 2001.Google Scholar
10. Sophie Hope and Sarah Carrington, ‘Archive projects’, B+B, http://www.welcomebb.org.uk/.Google Scholar
11. Twyman, Michael, ‘Editor’s introduction’, in Rickards, Maurice, The encyclopedia of ephemera: a guide to the fragmentary documents of everyday life for the collector, curator and historian (London: British Library, 2000).Google Scholar
12. RLG, Art and Architecture Group, ‘“Inaccessible Domain” Materials Working Group report’, 1997, http://www.rlg.org/indomat.html.Google Scholar
13. Library of Congress, Program for Cooperative Cataloging, BIBCO Monographic Bibliographic Record Program of the PCC, ‘BIBCO Core Record Standard for collections’, http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/bibco/corecoll.html.Google Scholar
14. Starr, Daniel. ‘Cataloging artist files: one library’s approach to providing integrated access to ephemeral material’, in IFLA 2000Jerusalem conference proceedings http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla66/papers/068-165e.htm.Google Scholar
15. Museum of Modern Art, Library, DADABASE, http://library.moma.org/. Online catalogue of the Museum of Modern Art Library, Archives and Study Centers.Google Scholar
16. Lawes, Elizabeth and Webb, Vicky, ‘Ephemera in the art library’, Art libraries journal 28, no. 2 (2003): 35–39.Google Scholar
17. Chambers, Edward Anthony, The emergence and development of black visual arts activity in England between 1981 and 1986 (PhD diss., University of London, 1998). See ‘Notes on the methodology’.Google Scholar
18. ARLIS/UK & Ireland, Union Periodicals Database, http://ipac.nal.vam.ac.uk/ipac20/ipac.jsp?profile=arlisnet#focus.Google Scholar
19. Art-Ephemera (discussion group), Archives of Art-Ephemera’, http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/art-ephemera.Google Scholar
20. With reference to documents ‘Artist Files Project: statement of purpose’ and ‘Artist Files Working Group: site structure’ presented at the meeting of the Artist Files Working Group, at the ARLIS/NA conference 2006, Banff, unpublished.Google Scholar
21. RLG, Art and Architecture Group “Inaccessible Domain”.Google Scholar
22. See notes of ARLIS/NA Artist Files Working Group meeting at ARLIS/NA conference 2004, New York.Google Scholar
23. National Gallery of Canada Library. Artists in Canada, Canadian Heritage Information Network (CHIN), http://daryl.chin.gc.ca:8000/BASIS/aich/user/www/sf.Google Scholar
24. Artists’ Papers Register, http://www.hmc.gov.uk/artists/.Google Scholar
25. WAAND: Women Artists Archives national Directory at Rutgers, http://waand.rutgers.edu/.Google Scholar
26. Art Spaces Artists Project (AS-AP), http://www.as-ap.org/about.cfm.Google Scholar
27. Reddeker, Lioba, ed., Archiving the present: manual on cataloguing modern and contemporary art in archives and databases=Gegenwart dokumentieren: Handbuch zur Erschließung moderner und zeitgenössischer Kunst in Archiven und Datenbanken (Vienna: Basis-Wien, forthcoming in 2006). Details from http://www.vektor.at/.Google Scholar
28. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, http://dublincore.org/.Google Scholar
29. Die Deutschen Bibliothek, Deutsche Nationalbibliografie online (Katalogdatenbank ILTIS), http://z3950gw.dbf.ddb.de/z3950/zfo_get_file.cgi?fileName=DDB/searchForm.html.Google Scholar
30. Getty Trust, Union lut of artists names online, http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabulary/ulan/index.html.Google Scholar
31. European-art.net, http://www.european-art.net/.Google Scholar
32. Hoyer, Rudiger, ‘The Virtueller Katalog Kunstgeschichte as a tool for international cooperation’, Art libraries journal 28, no.l (2003): 15–18. The Virtueller Katalog Kunstgeschichte is available at http://www.vkk.uni-karlsruhe.de.Google Scholar
33. UK DigiTool project, which ran from June 2004 to July 2005 was led by University College London Library in collaboration with Ex Libris, as a trial of their new DigiTool software.Google Scholar
34. For example SHERPA projects, see http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/.Google Scholar
35. Rinehart, Richard, ‘Access to art collections using encoded archival description and beyond: the future of large-scale consortium projects,’ Art libraries journal 26, no. 3 (2001): 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archive, Archiving the avant-garde: documenting and preserving digital/variable media art’, http://www.bampfa.berkeley.edu/about_bampfa/avantgarde.html Google Scholar
37. OCLC, ‘FRBR: OCLC research activities and IFLA’s Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records’, http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/frbr/.Google Scholar