Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-7lvjp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:11:44.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development, management and preservation of art and architectural microform collections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Paula Chiarmonte
Paula Chiarmonte*
Affiliation:
Architecture and Environmental Design Library, SUNY – Buffalo, New York
Get access

Abstract

Anticipated educational changes and their effects on libraries include increased emphasis upon independent study and consideration of economic priorities. These changes taking place in the eighties will force the issue of cost effective information systems for teaching and research. Economical advantages of the microformat include: compact storage, lower operational costs and economical text or image transfer onto paper or videodisc. Without overcoming the following impediments, however, microforms will not reach their full and remarkable potential as a research tool in the art and architectural reference library, 1) Lack of a systems approach, especially regarding technical standards; 2) Insufficient education of micrographics specialists, and; 3) Inadequate legal and copyright procedures.

This paper addresses the lack of a systems approach in the body of this paper and provides specific recommendations for establishment and maintenance of art and architectural microform collections with emphasis placed upon three key issues:

  • о Development

    • – selection of art and architectural microform software programs and the technology appropriate for their viewing, projecting and copying

  • о Management

    • – administration of a microforms collection including staffing patterns and bibliographic instruction

    • – bibliographic control methods and projects

    • – circulation

  • о Preservation

    • – facilities planning covering the issues of centralisation versus decentralisation and environmental factors

The use of microforms represents a critical link in the information transfer chain in art and architectural libraries. Promotional attitudes on the part of librarians as well as technical standards generated from the profession insures the success of a microform collection development program utilising the systems approach.

This paper was originally delivered to the section of Art Libraries at the 1983 IFLA Council.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 9 , Issue 3-4 , Autumn/Winter 1984 , pp. 26 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

(1) Gillespie, John T. and Spirt, Diana L.. Creating a school media program. New York: R.R. Bowker, 1973. p.207.Google Scholar
(2) Xerox University Microfilms in Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
(3) Hawken, W.P. Systems Instead of Standards. Library Journal, 98, Sept. 1973, p. 2515.Google Scholar
(4) Holmes, Donald C. Determination of user needs and future requirements for a systems approach to microform technology. Wash., D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1969.Google Scholar
(5) Reichmann, Felix and Josephine Tharpe. Bibliographic control of microforms. Westport, Conn.,: Greenwood Press, 1972, p.203.Google Scholar
(6) Bahr, Alice H. Microforms: the librarians’ view, 1978-1979. White Plains, N.Y.: Knowledge Industries Publications, 1978, p.85.Google Scholar
(7) Fair, Judy, (ed.) Microforms and management in special libraries: a reader. Weston, Conn.: Microform Review, 1979. p.41.Google Scholar
(8) Folcarelli, Ralph J. and Ferragamo, Ralph C.. Microform publications: hardware and suppliers. Library Trends, vol.24 no.4, April 1976, p.13.Google Scholar
(9) Hazen, Dan C. Collection development, collection management and preservation, Library Resources and Technical Services, vol.24 no.2, April 1982, pp.3–11.Google Scholar
(10) Salmon, Stephan R. User resistance to microforms in the research library, Microform Review, 3, July 1974, p. 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11) Reichmann, Felix and Tharpe, Josephine. Bibliographic control of microforms. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1972, p.203.Google Scholar
(12) O’Hara, Deborah Ann, (ed.) Microform Market Place 1982-83. Westport, Conn.: Meckler Publishing, 1982.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Campbell, B.W. A successful microfiche program. Special Libraries, 62, March 1971, pp. 136–42.Google Scholar
Diaz, Albert James, (ed) Microforms and library catalogues: a reader. Weston, Conn.: Microform Review, 1977.Google Scholar
Dodson, Suzanne Cates. Toward bibliographic control: the development of a guide to microform research collections. Microform Review, vol. 8 no. 4, April 1974, pp-. 210–18.Google Scholar
Gregory, Roma S. Acquisitions of microforms. Library Trends, 18, 1970, pp. 373–84.Google Scholar
Jebb, Marcia. Bibliographic control of microforms. Drexel Library Quarterly, vol. 11 no. 4, 1975, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
Kent, Allen et al, (eds) Microform Publication. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. New York.: Dekker, 1976. XVII, pp. 99–114.Google Scholar
Landau, Robert M. Microfiche Human Factors, Journal of Micrographics, 10 no. 5, May-June 1977, pp. 219–227.Google Scholar
Levin, Howard M. and Strothman, Wendy. Pictorial microfiche, Journal of Micrographics, 10, March 1977, pp. 153–8.Google Scholar
Otten, Klaus W. A hypothesis: microforms will become the major medium for ‘New Information’ in reference libraries. Journal of Micrographics, 4, 1971, pp. 266–76.Google Scholar
Robbins, Eugenia S. Microfiche – a visual explosion in mini-dimensions, Art Journal, 37, Fall 1977, pp. 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffady, William. Micrographics. Littleton, (Col.): Libraries Unlimited, 1978.Google Scholar
Sandstrom, Sven. Microfiche systems – our future main reference resource for art work? AICARC Bulletin, 10, 1979, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
Sisson, Jacqueline. The role of microforms in collection development. ARLIS/NA Newsletter, vol. 8 no. 1, December 1979, pp. 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teague, S.J. Microform librarianship. Woburn (Mass.): Butterworth, 1977.Google Scholar
Veaner, Allen B., ed. Studies in micropublishing: a reader. Weston, (Conn.): Microform Review, 1977.Google Scholar
Walsh, Patricia, ed. Visual Arts Issue, Microform Review, vol. 8 no. 3, Summer 1979, pp. 1–237.Google Scholar
Williams, B.J.S. Microforms in information retrieval and communication systems, ASLIB Proceedings, 19, 1967, pp. 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar