Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:27:40.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘crisis’ of art bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Jan Simane
Jan Simane*
Affiliation:
IFLA Art Libraries Section, Kunsthistorisches Institut in Florenz, Max-Planck-Institut, Via Giuseppe Giusti 44, 50121 Florence, Italy
*
Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The temporary cessation to publication of the leading and most comprehensive bibliography in the arts, the International bibliography of art (formerly Bibliography of the history of art) in 2009, led to a lively debate on the future of art bibliography. Many scholars, librarians and information specialists were in favour of saving the established model and of ensuring its continuing existence. At the same time there arose the controversial and much-debated question of whether the traditional model of the IBA – grounded in an intellectual analysis of documents (articles from journals, monographs, exhibition catalogues, etc.) and their description with standardised metadata and abstracts – still corresponds to the needs of modern research on the one hand and to the new potentialities and realities of displaying, connecting, exchanging and gaining information in digital data networks on the other. Library catalogues play a decisive role in this consideration: unlike bibliographies, which follow traditional and more or less unvaried standards, they have mutated to a great degree from inflexible registers to dynamic networks. They enrich and connect the bibliographic information with additional data, they invite the user to tag and to review the corresponding literature and they enable complex forms of unforeseeable discovery. Thus the ‘crisis’ into which art bibliography was plunged when the old IBA ceased publication, at the same time opened up the opportunity to discuss alternative, future-oriented solutions for the appropriate format of bibliographic information supply in the arts today.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 36 , Special Issue 3: Special issue: the future of art bibliography , 2011 , pp. 5 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2011

References

1. Lyotard, Jean-François, The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
2. Webster, Frank, Theories of the information society, 3rd ed. (London: Routledge, 2006), 119 et seq.Google Scholar
3. Gessner, Conrad, Bibliotheca universalis: sive catalogus omnium scriptorum locupletissimus in tribus linguis Latina, Graeca 6 Hebraica ... (Zurich: Apud Christophorum Froschouerum, 1545-1555).Google Scholar
4. Sorensen, Lee R., ‘Art bibliographies: a survey of their development, 1595-1821,’ Library quarterly 56, no.1 (1986): 31–55, 42 et seq.Google Scholar
5. Besterman, Theodore, The beginnings of systematic bibliography, 2nd ed. (New York: B. Franklin, 1968), 1.Google Scholar
See also Capaccioni, Andrea, introduction to Gli origini della bibliografia, by Besterman, Theodore (Florence: Le Lettere, 2008), 16–18.Google Scholar
6. Besterman, , The beginnings, 9–10; Capaccioni, ‘Introduction,’ 8.Google Scholar
7. Besterman, , The beginnings, 2.Google Scholar
8. Besterman, Theodore, ‘The European Union Catalogue Project,’ Journal of documentation 14 (1958), 56–64.Google Scholar
9. artlibraries.net, http://www.artlibraries.net. See article by Rüdiger Hoyer in this issue of the Art libraries journal.Google Scholar