Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:51:13.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Art libraries in Polytechnics

An ARLIS statement on the provision and exploitation of library resources for art and design courses in Polytechnics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Philip Pacey
Get access

Extract

This statement has been developed from a paper submitted to the CNAA Working Party on Libraries and Related Resources by myself as a member of that Working Party, and discussed at its meeting on 12th June 1978. The purpose of that paper was to define the special needs of a particular subject area, art and design, and to show how those needs can be lost sight of if quantitative standards are overstressed by comparison with the quality of a library’s service to its readers. The Working Party welcomed this paper, took note of its emphasis on the ‘browsability’ of library materials, and suggested that it might be put before the CNAA Committee for Art and Design, ‘possibly in a revised version’.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , Spring 1979 , pp. 36 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Fawcett, Trevor. ‘Art Libraries’, in British Librarianship and Information Science 1971-1975, p. 262.Google Scholar
(2) Pacey, Philip. Editorial, in ARLIS Newsletter, no. 26, March 1976, p. 2.Google Scholar
(3) Smith, Gaye, writing on art and design in Manchester Polytechnic Library, in Library Association Record, vol. 79, no. 6, June 1977, pp. 316–318.Google Scholar
(4) BLCMP includes 13 polytechnic libraries at the time of going to press Editor. Google Scholar
Varley, Gillian. The academic art library: some management problems. Art Libraries Journal, Spring 1977, pp. 11–17. (‘It is difficult to fit these unusual needs into a large general academic library without art students being affected by the lethargy which results from lack of subject concentration. A better solution for art and design … is the decentralised library having a close relationship with the subject teaching area’).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Gaye. The problems of centralised cataloguing for users of art material. ARLIS Newsletter, June 1975, pp. 18–22. Report of the Dewey Decimal Classification Working Party. ARLIS, 1978.Google Scholar
Houghton, Beth. Whatever happened to tutor librarianship? Art Libraries Journal, Winter 1976, pp. 4–19 (on the division of labour achieved by the creation of ‘academic librarians’ at Leicester Polytechnic).Google Scholar
‘A statement on standards in art and design libraries’. ARLIS Newsletter, March 1973, pp.2–9;reprinted in Taylor, L.J. ed. A Librarian’s Handbook. Library Association, 1977.Google Scholar