Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-nvqbz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-03T16:52:17.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trevor Fawcett comments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Trevor Fawcett
Trevor Fawcett*
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article Commentary
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , Summer 1980 , pp. 34 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) A convenient summary of the original Marxist theory of art may be found in Egbert, D.D. Social radicalism and the arts, London: Duckworth, 1970, pp.65–113. Neither Marx nor Engles wrote a treatise specifically on aesthetics.Google Scholar