Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:09:24.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inside the discipline, outside the paradigm: keeping track of the New Art History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Lyn Korenic
Lyn Korenic*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara, California, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

From the point of view of a student of art history in the 1980s re-entering the discipline as a graduate student, the ‘new’ art history represents a dramatically wider field of enquiry involving new methodologies, although ‘old’ art history is still pursued by some academics. The ‘new’ art history employs an interdisciplinary approach which embraces materials far beyond ‘traditional’ art historical sources, and so information has to be sought outside the art library and via the Internet. Librarians responsible for supporting art history studies need to keep in touch with teachers, with curriculum developments, and with the discipline itself; it may also be helpful to get involved in staff/student use of the Web, and to collaborate with other Humanities librarians. The way in which the ‘new’ art history branches out in all directions parallels the hypertext linkages of the Web and the complexity of our globally-connected world.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , 1997 , pp. 12 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See brochure AAH: the Association for Art History. Bloomington: Indiana University, n.d. The Co-presidents of AAH are Bruce Cole, Indiana University, and Andrew Ladis, University of Georgia. For information, send e-mail to: [email protected] Google Scholar
2. Abigail Solomon-Godeau, who teaches in the History of Art and Architecture Department at the University of California-Santa Barbara, is a contemporary critic and expert in French neo-classicism. She defines herself as a feminist scholar rather than as an art historian. (Author’s conversation with Abigail Solomon-Godeau, 3rd February 1997).Google Scholar
3. Plochere, Michelle. ‘A conversation with Abigail Solomon-Godeau’. Artweek 7th November 1991 p.21.Google Scholar
4. Bal, Mieke. ‘Signs in painting’. Art Bulletin vol. 78 March 1996 p. 7–8.Google Scholar
5. Ibid., p.8.Google Scholar
6. Ibid., p.8–9.Google Scholar
7. The History of Art and Architecture Department at UCSB is the largest art history department west of the University of Michigan. Faculty cover a broad and diverse area of expertise. In non-Western art we have faculty working in African, Asian, Islamic, and Pre-Columbian, but we also retain traditional strengths in the Western area, from ancient to present, although modernist studies dominate. Four architectural historians comprise another area of strength.Google Scholar
8. Robertson, Bruce. Program review of self-assessment 1996-97, History of Art and Architecture, UCSB, p.20.Google Scholar
9. Ibid.Google Scholar
10. Author’s conversation with Abigail Solomon-Godeau.Google Scholar
11. Robertson, , op. cit. p.20.Google Scholar
12. Mack, Rainer. Announcement of Seminar for Art History 252A, ‘Subject, Subjectivity, Representation’, UCSB, Spring 1997.Google Scholar
13. Meadow, Mark. Announcement for Seminar for Art History 255E, ‘The Frame’, UCSB, Fall/Winter’ 1996-97.Google Scholar
14. Liu, Alan Y. E-mail message promoting UCSB English Department Web Collective, June 30th 1995.Google Scholar